Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I understand why Trump supports couldn't care less about this stuff, and I understand why the anti trumpers are screaming impreachment over it... the real question is what do the moderates and independents think? They are the ones that are going to swing the midterm elections in 18 and the next prez in 2020.I think there is nothing to itYou think it's all made up?if Trump actually asked Comey to back off the investigation AND Comey, in turn failed to report that to Congress, then Comey should be in even more trouble himself
bottom line - this is yet more BS & a continuation of the constant attacks on Trump
Trump meeting with foreign dignitaries = no big deal
Trump's conversation with Comey = context is everything
based on just the quote from the NYT memo, there does not look to be obstruction
seriously - the hair on fire hysteria is out of control
Trump is not going down
TRANSLATION: Still no one will admit to seeing this "memo", upon which the entire conspiracy theory rests.Comey took notes of his interaction with President Trump, or so it is claimed. Such notes are evidence, and if they were time stamped in February, President Pence seems to have gotten the gold ring.
Then we have to worry about Ayatollah Pence and his believe in holy ghosts. Good grief, where is Nixon now that we need him.
Once the memo - if it exists - is produced, Trump is gone.
They can if they all come from the same sources.TRANSLATION: Still no one will admit to seeing this "memo", upon which the entire conspiracy theory rests.Comey took notes of his interaction with President Trump, or so it is claimed. Such notes are evidence, and if they were time stamped in February, President Pence seems to have gotten the gold ring.
Then we have to worry about Ayatollah Pence and his believe in holy ghosts. Good grief, where is Nixon now that we need him.
Statically all of these stories, connections and business dealing can't all be fake.
They can if they all come from the same sources.TRANSLATION: Still no one will admit to seeing this "memo", upon which the entire conspiracy theory rests.Comey took notes of his interaction with President Trump, or so it is claimed. Such notes are evidence, and if they were time stamped in February, President Pence seems to have gotten the gold ring.
Then we have to worry about Ayatollah Pence and his believe in holy ghosts. Good grief, where is Nixon now that we need him.
Statically all of these stories, connections and business dealing can't all be fake.
You mean like 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999% of polls saying Hillary's going to win?They can if they all come from the same sources.TRANSLATION: Still no one will admit to seeing this "memo", upon which the entire conspiracy theory rests.Comey took notes of his interaction with President Trump, or so it is claimed. Such notes are evidence, and if they were time stamped in February, President Pence seems to have gotten the gold ring.
Then we have to worry about Ayatollah Pence and his believe in holy ghosts. Good grief, where is Nixon now that we need him.
Statically all of these stories, connections and business dealing can't all be fake.
The source doesn't determine its authenticity. The story itself does.
And it's not one source that inserted fake names into his business contracts, created appointments for Trump and his associates with Russians AND as a cherry on top are also writing for all the news you don't like.
Like I said all of it can't be fake statistically.
In fact, nearly every report purporting to make Trump look bad on any subject, comes from hard-left newspapers, and most have only anonymous sources. So there's nobody investigators can put on the stand and question about what they saw and heard.
How convenient.
BTW, how are the Democrats doing in finding the people in Russia who hacked our election? Any sources we can question? Any descriptions of which people they influenced, so we can question them?
Well, what do you know. No names. No specific actions found, no evidence at all.
Seems to be an emerging pattern in all these "blockbuster" reports from Democrat sources.
BTW, Comey had a chance to testify before Congress. Why didn't he mention any such request from Trump to shut down any investigation? Didn't even bring up the memo this "report" now points to as their chief (and only) source.
And why don't any of the screeching, outraged Democrats display any curiosity about these questions?
TRANSLATION: Still no one will admit to seeing this "memo", upon which the entire conspiracy theory rests.Comey took notes of his interaction with President Trump, or so it is claimed. Such notes are evidence, and if they were time stamped in February, President Pence seems to have gotten the gold ring.
Then we have to worry about Ayatollah Pence and his believe in holy ghosts. Good grief, where is Nixon now that we need him.
You mean like 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999% of polls saying Hillary's going to win?They can if they all come from the same sources.TRANSLATION: Still no one will admit to seeing this "memo", upon which the entire conspiracy theory rests.Comey took notes of his interaction with President Trump, or so it is claimed. Such notes are evidence, and if they were time stamped in February, President Pence seems to have gotten the gold ring.
Then we have to worry about Ayatollah Pence and his believe in holy ghosts. Good grief, where is Nixon now that we need him.
Statically all of these stories, connections and business dealing can't all be fake.
The source doesn't determine its authenticity. The story itself does.
And it's not one source that inserted fake names into his business contracts, created appointments for Trump and his associates with Russians AND as a cherry on top are also writing for all the news you don't like.
Like I said all of it can't be fake statistically.
The scary thing is your serious...in your own mind.
Once the memo - if it exists - is produced, Trump is gone.
If Comey wrote it tomorrow that would be good enough for you. But as his boss Trump can order investigations started or stopped, like he was Obama. But since Flynn did nothing illegal there was nothing to stop.
It's the beginning of the end.They are all Saturday Night Live.skits.
Comey testified in Congress today about his Memo. Your Orange-faced baboon is toast.
In your opinion the Russian Prime Minister and Ambassador are spies.You mean like 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999% of polls saying Hillary's going to win?They can if they all come from the same sources.TRANSLATION: Still no one will admit to seeing this "memo", upon which the entire conspiracy theory rests.
Statically all of these stories, connections and business dealing can't all be fake.
The source doesn't determine its authenticity. The story itself does.
And it's not one source that inserted fake names into his business contracts, created appointments for Trump and his associates with Russians AND as a cherry on top are also writing for all the news you don't like.
Like I said all of it can't be fake statistically.
The scary thing is your serious...in your own mind.
Poor guy doesn't realize the difference between a prediction and a news story. "Redskins will win" is not the same as "Redskins Win!"
Like I said, statistically it's impossible for all the stories, connections, business dealings be fake. You can't see Trump meeting with the Russian spy that is part of the investigation and say it didn't happen or if it did it's ok. Theres pictures that it did happen! Like Whut?
Then then spilling secrets to that guy and saying it didn't happen or if it did it's ok. Asking Comey for loyalty and saying it didn't happen or if it did it's ok.
It can't be both things
Yet a DNC staff member is dead. Two shots in the back. The killers didn't steal anything of value. Why?In fact, nearly every report purporting to make Trump look bad on any subject, comes from hard-left newspapers, and most have only anonymous sources. So there's nobody investigators can put on the stand and question about what they saw and heard.
How convenient.
BTW, how are the Democrats doing in finding the people in Russia who hacked our election? Any sources we can question? Any descriptions of which people they influenced, so we can question them?
Well, what do you know. No names. No specific actions found, no evidence at all.
Seems to be an emerging pattern in all these "blockbuster" reports from Democrat sources.
BTW, Comey had a chance to testify before Congress. Why didn't he mention any such request from Trump to shut down any investigation? Didn't even bring up the memo this "report" now points to as their chief (and only) source.
And why don't any of the screeching, outraged Democrats display any curiosity about these questions?
In fact, nearly every report purporting to make Trump look bad on any subject,
In your opinion the Russian Prime Minister and Ambassador are spies.You mean like 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999% of polls saying Hillary's going to win?They can if they all come from the same sources.Statically all of these stories, connections and business dealing can't all be fake.
The source doesn't determine its authenticity. The story itself does.
And it's not one source that inserted fake names into his business contracts, created appointments for Trump and his associates with Russians AND as a cherry on top are also writing for all the news you don't like.
Like I said all of it can't be fake statistically.
The scary thing is your serious...in your own mind.
Poor guy doesn't realize the difference between a prediction and a news story. "Redskins will win" is not the same as "Redskins Win!"
Like I said, statistically it's impossible for all the stories, connections, business dealings be fake. You can't see Trump meeting with the Russian spy that is part of the investigation and say it didn't happen or if it did it's ok. Theres pictures that it did happen! Like Whut?
Then then spilling secrets to that guy and saying it didn't happen or if it did it's ok. Asking Comey for loyalty and saying it didn't happen or if it did it's ok.
It can't be both things
Shouldn't they have been arrested by now?
