Nunes about to be KO'ed.....

[Lastamender]

The Washington Compost owned by CIA shill Jeff Bezos and the NY Times, also a shill for the CFR SEZ??????

"Move along folks......nothing to see here!!!"


ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Tomorrow will be a very SAD day for you ......your Trump cult ilk.....and Nunes.....LOL

Tomorrow will be another embarrassment for you, but enough about your personal life. That memo will be shredded.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

If Nunes' allegation that the FBI LIED to the FISC judges was the "central" accusation..........the Trump stooge, Nunes should have read the footnotes...LOL

• The Nunes memo's claim that the FBI and Department of Justice misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when seeking to wiretap Trump campaign adviser Carter Page may have been quashed.

• Officials familiar with the matter told The Washington Post and The New York Times that the DOJ made it clear to the court that information contained in a dossier they submitted as part of a FISA application to surveil Page was politically motivated.

• The revelation undercuts the most important claim in Nunes' memo as he seeks to characterize the FBI and the DOJ as corrupt and biased against President Donald Trump.

The central argument in the Nunes memo may have just been debunked

I’m going to send you out on a limb here and see if you chop it off.

Is it better for the Dems if the warrant was issued because of lower level lies? Or is it better they told the truth and the FISA court approved it anyway?

I’m trying to think which one is better for the dems. Corruption at this agency? Or the other one? No chance it gets back to Trump so which would you prefer?

IOW, there is no non-corrupt or "good side" to what was done. I get it.


The main problem is that some were in a government agency, IMO.

The main point is they were all government agencies and at the beck and call of the democrats. And the left is trying to sell this as something against Trump. So far the only clean person is this entire Russia clusterfuck IS Trump.

 

[Lewdog]

Nat you are such an idiot. Anyone with two cents to rub together in their brain knows Nunes is only exposing that the Illuminati is using Chem trails to discredit Trump!

 

[Lastamender]

Nat you are such an idiot. Anyone with two cents to rub together in their brain knows Nunes is only exposing that the Illuminati is using Chem trails to discredit Trump!

"By George, I think she has it."

 

[KeiserC]

Mr. C....No doubt he is a dumb ass, but kicking him around kills some time. No matter how long I go between posts, I am certain of one thing when I log in, Nat will post some crap and it will be wrong.

The Washington Compost owned by CIA shill Jeff Bezos and the NY Times, also a shill for the CFR SEZ??????

"Move along folks......nothing to see here!!!"


ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Tomorrow will be a very SAD day for you ......your Trump cult ilk.....and Nunes.....LOL

Tomorrow will be another embarrassment for you, but enough about your personal life. That memo will be shredded.

A tenuous 64 minutes it will be....!!! I'm on pins and needles right now waiting for my 'Trumpcentric' world to come crashing down around me... The horror! it's only 63 minutes now ....

 

[Care4all]

But who paid for it wasn't told to the Court.

Nunes is petitioning the FISA court.

Better hold on to your skirt and grab your pussy hat.

a gimmick!

he already got permission to review it all.... he chose not t and let his staffers do it...

he doesn't need a subpoena.....

he already had that parade to speaker ryan's office with the Justice dept Rosenstein and Chris Wray and others, where they agreed to let him view the case in a SCIF....

 

[OldGringo]

I am new to this forum and really appreciate both the well thought out opinions and the tongue in cheek humor. One thing that always strikes me as odd is that so many people place so much trust on a media outlet who prints some story by saying "we have 9 secret sources close to the investigation who have confirmed"....yada, yada, yada. Of course they know they will never have to divulge a source, that's a first amendment deal. Of course, if it was Comey, it could be true and he is known to leak things and he certainly would know, probably not because that would show extreme cowardice at this point. The US Army still has small units of people who are called the Psychological Operations Units who intentionally create false media stories, in other countries of course. Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Specialist (37F). When I was young I had that training. One of the fundamental things they do is create documents to distribute on paper, blogs, social media, etc in which they claim they have some secret data from some government official that said this or that. So, every time I see articles like the ones flying around today where it says somebody has snitched off what was actually said in the courtroom to a FISA judge I must wonder who is really so limited as to believe it when they hide their sources. Of course I believe in protecting sources, but when the security of this still free country is at stake, seems to me they should adopt a higher standard with a higher degree of integrity. Just because you perceive the other guys as liars , crooks and cheats does nothing to justify you to stooping to their level. Just my old opinion, I might be wrong.

 

[Lewdog]

I am new to this forum and really appreciate both the well thought out opinions and the tongue in cheek humor. One thing that always strikes me as odd is that so many people place so much trust on a media outlet who prints some story by saying "we have 9 secret sources close to the investigation who have confirmed"....yada, yada, yada. Of course they know they will never have to divulge a source, that's a first amendment deal. Of course, if it was Comey, it could be true and he is known to leak things and he certainly would know, probably not because that would show extreme cowardice at this point. The US Army still has small units of people who are called the Psychological Operations Units who intentionally create false media stories, in other countries of course. Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Specialist (37F). When I was young I had that training. One of the fundamental things they do is create documents to distribute on paper, blogs, social media, etc in which they claim they have some secret data from some government official that said this or that. So, every time I see articles like the ones flying around today where it says somebody has snitched off what was actually said in the courtroom to a FISA judge I must wonder who is really so limited as to believe it when they hide their sources. Of course I believe in protecting sources, but when the security of this still free country is at stake, seems to me they should adopt a higher standard with a higher degree of integrity. Just because you perceive the other guys as liars , crooks and cheats does nothing to justify you to stooping to their level. Just my old opinion, I might be wrong.

No one really snitched. It was sent to Trump and he chose to declassify it to be made public.

 

[OldGringo]

Does anybody know if they have audible recordings or court reporters present for FISA hearings or presentations to the judge? The oral guarantees made by the lawyers presenting the application would be critical to what actually happened if it not fully spelled out in the application and supporting affidavits. Be nice to know since Nunez is making a motion to publish under the FISA court rules. I would think that the DOJ lawyers would be (spitting bricks) to keep any such records from getting out in public. Actually, if any such statements were not true that could set any such lawyer up for pretty devastating lawsuits. Yes, I know they have sovereign immunity but if they were caught lying, that is not a part of their oath or job, so they might lose that protection. Just be nice to know so we can be more informed.

 

[OldGringo]

I am new to this forum and really appreciate both the well thought out opinions and the tongue in cheek humor. One thing that always strikes me as odd is that so many people place so much trust on a media outlet who prints some story by saying "we have 9 secret sources close to the investigation who have confirmed"....yada, yada, yada. Of course they know they will never have to divulge a source, that's a first amendment deal. Of course, if it was Comey, it could be true and he is known to leak things and he certainly would know, probably not because that would show extreme cowardice at this point. The US Army still has small units of people who are called the Psychological Operations Units who intentionally create false media stories, in other countries of course. Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Specialist (37F). When I was young I had that training. One of the fundamental things they do is create documents to distribute on paper, blogs, social media, etc in which they claim they have some secret data from some government official that said this or that. So, every time I see articles like the ones flying around today where it says somebody has snitched off what was actually said in the courtroom to a FISA judge I must wonder who is really so limited as to believe it when they hide their sources. Of course I believe in protecting sources, but when the security of this still free country is at stake, seems to me they should adopt a higher standard with a higher degree of integrity. Just because you perceive the other guys as liars , crooks and cheats does nothing to justify you to stooping to their level. Just my old opinion, I might be wrong.

No one really snitched. It was sent to Trump and he chose to declassify it to be made public.

 

[OldGringo]

I am new to this forum and really appreciate both the well thought out opinions and the tongue in cheek humor. One thing that always strikes me as odd is that so many people place so much trust on a media outlet who prints some story by saying "we have 9 secret sources close to the investigation who have confirmed"....yada, yada, yada. Of course they know they will never have to divulge a source, that's a first amendment deal. Of course, if it was Comey, it could be true and he is known to leak things and he certainly would know, probably not because that would show extreme cowardice at this point. The US Army still has small units of people who are called the Psychological Operations Units who intentionally create false media stories, in other countries of course. Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Specialist (37F). When I was young I had that training. One of the fundamental things they do is create documents to distribute on paper, blogs, social media, etc in which they claim they have some secret data from some government official that said this or that. So, every time I see articles like the ones flying around today where it says somebody has snitched off what was actually said in the courtroom to a FISA judge I must wonder who is really so limited as to believe it when they hide their sources. Of course I believe in protecting sources, but when the security of this still free country is at stake, seems to me they should adopt a higher standard with a higher degree of integrity. Just because you perceive the other guys as liars , crooks and cheats does nothing to justify you to stooping to their level. Just my old opinion, I might be wrong.

No one really snitched. It was sent to Trump and he chose to declassify it to be made public.

 

[OldGringo]

I am sorry lewdog, I was not clear. I was referring to the lead article where is claims, that "sources familiar with this case told the NYT and Washington post... either somebody who actually had access to the supporting documents revealed that data. So, it would appear that somebody disclosed, ratted or snitched, what was probably classified info. The supported documents have not been released. If you have copies please post them. Just joking..

 

[Lewdog]

I am sorry lewdog, I was not clear. I was referring to the lead article where is claims, that "sources familiar with this case told the NYT and Washington post... either somebody who actually had access to the supporting documents revealed that data. So, it would appear that somebody disclosed, ratted or snitched, what was probably classified info. The supported documents have not been released. If you have copies please post them. Just joking..

I'm sorry...

"If I told you, I'd have to kill you." (No that isn't a threat... that's a movie line!)

 

[Siete]

I am sorry lewdog, I was not clear. I was referring to the lead article where is claims, that "sources familiar with this case told the NYT and Washington post... either somebody who actually had access to the supporting documents revealed that data. So, it would appear that somebody disclosed, ratted or snitched, what was probably classified info. The supported documents have not been released. If you have copies please post them. Just joking..

I'm sorry...

"If I told you, I'd have to kill you." (No that isn't a threat... that's a movie line!)

a movie line works - thats where the Nunes memo came from, A FICTION MOVIE.

 

[Lewdog]

I am sorry lewdog, I was not clear. I was referring to the lead article where is claims, that "sources familiar with this case told the NYT and Washington post... either somebody who actually had access to the supporting documents revealed that data. So, it would appear that somebody disclosed, ratted or snitched, what was probably classified info. The supported documents have not been released. If you have copies please post them. Just joking..

I'm sorry...

"If I told you, I'd have to kill you." (No that isn't a threat... that's a movie line!)

a movie line works - thats where the Nunes memo came from, A FICTION MOVIE.

I had to be specific... otherwise there would be 5 pages of people saying I threatened the new guy.

 

[Lastamender]

Did this loser author the Democratic memo?

Adam Schiff: Russians love our 2nd Amendment they want us to kill each other (VIDEO)

 

[OldGringo]

Oh that's Ok. New guys enjoys banter and takes no offense. As Jeff Cooper would say, "you are only outgunned when you miss".

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I am sorry lewdog, I was not clear. I was referring to the lead article where is claims, that "sources familiar with this case told the NYT and Washington post... either somebody who actually had access to the supporting documents revealed that data. So, it would appear that somebody disclosed, ratted or snitched, what was probably classified info. The supported documents have not been released. If you have copies please post them. Just joking..

It's so funny how everything from the left comes from anonymous sources, sources familiar, but never any names.

Oh, that's right, we have to protect their identity. It couldn't be that they are full of shit.

 

[Siete]

I am sorry lewdog, I was not clear. I was referring to the lead article where is claims, that "sources familiar with this case told the NYT and Washington post... either somebody who actually had access to the supporting documents revealed that data. So, it would appear that somebody disclosed, ratted or snitched, what was probably classified info. The supported documents have not been released. If you have copies please post them. Just joking..

It's so funny how everything from the left comes from anonymous sources, sources familiar, but never any names.

Oh, that's right, we have to protect their identity. It couldn't be that they are full of shit.

THEY CANT NAME NAMES.

DDDUUUHHHH

the dem memo hasnt been released or declassified, and they wont leak it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

STAY tuned, Trump Cultists.....the real fun hasn't yet started....

Yes, we know. That's what we have been telling you on the left for the past two weeks.