Nukes found in libya

gibberish and misleading spin = Foxbot bs

Actually, it originated in an Al Arabya story... according to Israel Radio who said so in a broadcast...which was then picked up by the Jerusalem Post. All the stories originate from that first Al Arabya one.
 
Ay caramba! Brainwashed Fox/Rush/Pub dupes....ANOTHER BS propaganda POS gibberish story LOL!

Has FOX mentioned this? Rush? please provide any source that either have mentioned this? I don't think any American news source has mentioned it.

Libya's Prime Minister Confirms Presence Of Chemical Weapons | Fox News
Let me guess... I made up the link, right?

And get this, shit for brains... they do not cite the source of their information, but it is same exact information the Al Arabya to Israel Radio to Jerusalem Post chain of crap had.

that is your problem, dipshit... you never think. You take the first story that you hear that agrees with your predisposition on a subject, and you run with it, regardless of how many times it is proven false.
 
Last edited:
Ay caramba! Brainwashed Fox/Rush/Pub dupes....ANOTHER BS propaganda POS gibberish story LOL!

Has FOX mentioned this? Rush? please provide any source that either have mentioned this? I don't think any American news source has mentioned it.

Libya's Prime Minister Confirms Presence Of Chemical Weapons | Fox News
Let me guess... I made up the link, right?

that is your problem, dipshit... you never think. You take the first story that you hear that agrees with your predisposition on a subject, and you run with it, regardless of how many times it is proven false.

I was asking I didn't know because I don't listen to fox. The only dipshit is you *****
 
Look charles if you read the god damn source it says that Libya had nuke got it?

No it says that one Official Claims they had them. Almost every single other Relevant Fact screams that they could not have had one.
The PM is the official that made the claim or did you miss that part? After all it was your claim that the title was a false statement, now you say one official said it. Again the official was the PM. So which is it Charles?

Your Title is a False Claim.

First you say Nukes were "found" In Libya. That is simply not true. We have the PM, Claiming they have found them, We have nothing other than his word to substantiate this.
My guess is this is a Translation Issue. I would be willing to bet either the PM is lying, or he was simply saying they Found Nuclear Materials, Not an Actual Functioning Nuclear Weapon.

Either way your Title is not Only False, it appears deliberately Misleading.

"Nukes Found in Libya"? Based on the word of one man, and contrary to every Bit of Intel we have, is simply not an accurate statement. If they do have an actual Bomb, it is very likely it is not Technically Nuclear. As in Thermo Nuclear. It is likely it is a crude Uranium based Atomic Weapon more akin to what we used in WWII than a Nuclear weapon as we think of them today.

A better title would have been. PM claims Nukes Found in Libya.

:)
 
Last edited:
No it says that one Official Claims they had them. Almost every single other Relevant Fact screams that they could not have had one.
The PM is the official that made the claim or did you miss that part? After all it was your claim that the title was a false statement, now you say one official said it. Again the official was the PM. So which is it Charles?

Your Title is a False Claim.

First you say Nukes were "found" In Libya. That is simply not true. We have the PM, Claiming they have found them, We have nothing other than his word to substantiate this.
My guess is this is a Translation Issue. I would be willing to bet either the PM is lying, or he was simply saying they Found Nuclear Materials, Not an Actual Functioning Nuclear Weapon.

Either way your Title is not Only False, it appears deliberately Misleading.

"Nukes Found in Libya"? Based on the word of one man, and contrary to every Bit of Intel we have, is simply not an accurate statement. If they do have an actual Bomb, it is very likely it is not Technically Nuclear. As in Thermo Nuclear. It is likely it is a crude Uranium based Atomic Weapon more akin to what we used in WWII than a Nuclear weapon as we think of them today.

A better title would have been. PM claims Nukes Found in Libya.

:)

Actually, a better title would have been...
Here's another in a long line of lies and misinformation by yours truly, BIGMORON1775
 
No it says that one Official Claims they had them. Almost every single other Relevant Fact screams that they could not have had one.
The PM is the official that made the claim or did you miss that part? After all it was your claim that the title was a false statement, now you say one official said it. Again the official was the PM. So which is it Charles?

Your Title is a False Claim.

First you say Nukes were "found" In Libya. That is simply not true. We have the PM, Claiming they have found them, We have nothing other than his word to substantiate this.
My guess is this is a Translation Issue. I would be willing to bet either the PM is lying, or he was simply saying they Found Nuclear Materials, Not an Actual Functioning Nuclear Weapon.

Either way your Title is not Only False, it appears deliberately Misleading.

"Nukes Found in Libya"? Based on the word of one man, and contrary to every Bit of Intel we have, is simply not an accurate statement. If they do have an actual Bomb, it is very likely it is not Technically Nuclear. As in Thermo Nuclear. It is likely it is a crude Uranium based Atomic Weapon more akin to what we used in WWII than a Nuclear weapon as we think of them today.

A better title would have been. PM claims Nukes Found in Libya.

:)

careful, if you keep disagreeing with biglunatic1775, he'll claim you're a liberal and on Obama's payroll.
 
I understand why Republicans are terrified at this "news". They think you can "McGiver" a nuclear bomb together with two cans of hair spray, a toothpick, a bobby pin, some gum and a "glow in the dark" wristwatch.
 
No it says that one Official Claims they had them. Almost every single other Relevant Fact screams that they could not have had one.
The PM is the official that made the claim or did you miss that part? After all it was your claim that the title was a false statement, now you say one official said it. Again the official was the PM. So which is it Charles?

Your Title is a False Claim.

First you say Nukes were "found" In Libya. That is simply not true. We have the PM, Claiming they have found them, We have nothing other than his word to substantiate this.
My guess is this is a Translation Issue. I would be willing to bet either the PM is lying, or he was simply saying they Found Nuclear Materials, Not an Actual Functioning Nuclear Weapon.

Either way your Title is not Only False, it appears deliberately Misleading.

"Nukes Found in Libya"? Based on the word of one man, and contrary to every Bit of Intel we have, is simply not an accurate statement. If they do have an actual Bomb, it is very likely it is not Technically Nuclear. As in Thermo Nuclear. It is likely it is a crude Uranium based Atomic Weapon more akin to what we used in WWII than a Nuclear weapon as we think of them today.

A better title would have been. PM claims Nukes Found in Libya.

:)
From the source did the PM say Libya had nukes? Yes or no?
 
The PM is the official that made the claim or did you miss that part? After all it was your claim that the title was a false statement, now you say one official said it. Again the official was the PM. So which is it Charles?

Your Title is a False Claim.

First you say Nukes were "found" In Libya. That is simply not true. We have the PM, Claiming they have found them, We have nothing other than his word to substantiate this.
My guess is this is a Translation Issue. I would be willing to bet either the PM is lying, or he was simply saying they Found Nuclear Materials, Not an Actual Functioning Nuclear Weapon.

Either way your Title is not Only False, it appears deliberately Misleading.

"Nukes Found in Libya"? Based on the word of one man, and contrary to every Bit of Intel we have, is simply not an accurate statement. If they do have an actual Bomb, it is very likely it is not Technically Nuclear. As in Thermo Nuclear. It is likely it is a crude Uranium based Atomic Weapon more akin to what we used in WWII than a Nuclear weapon as we think of them today.

A better title would have been. PM claims Nukes Found in Libya.

:)

Actually, a better title would have been...
Here's another in a long line of lies and misinformation by yours truly, BIGMORON1775
Hey big ******* liar move along.
 
The PM is the official that made the claim or did you miss that part? After all it was your claim that the title was a false statement, now you say one official said it. Again the official was the PM. So which is it Charles?

Your Title is a False Claim.

First you say Nukes were "found" In Libya. That is simply not true. We have the PM, Claiming they have found them, We have nothing other than his word to substantiate this.
My guess is this is a Translation Issue. I would be willing to bet either the PM is lying, or he was simply saying they Found Nuclear Materials, Not an Actual Functioning Nuclear Weapon.

Either way your Title is not Only False, it appears deliberately Misleading.

"Nukes Found in Libya"? Based on the word of one man, and contrary to every Bit of Intel we have, is simply not an accurate statement. If they do have an actual Bomb, it is very likely it is not Technically Nuclear. As in Thermo Nuclear. It is likely it is a crude Uranium based Atomic Weapon more akin to what we used in WWII than a Nuclear weapon as we think of them today.

A better title would have been. PM claims Nukes Found in Libya.

:)

careful, if you keep disagreeing with biglunatic1775, he'll claim you're a liberal and on Obama's payroll.

No I know charles more than I know you your new here so **** off.
 
15th post
We'll see about that...

That's just a little bit to late for that wouldn't you agree?

Too late for what, since you haven't got a clue on the real situation yet? The report is rather sketchy, but you already postulated a nuclear-armed Al Qaeda. Scaremonger much?

Shouldn't this be something we get ahead of rather than taking a "wait and see" approach?
By the time we would find out for certain it's too ******* late
 
That's just a little bit to late for that wouldn't you agree?

Too late for what, since you haven't got a clue on the real situation yet? The report is rather sketchy, but you already postulated a nuclear-armed Al Qaeda. Scaremonger much?

Shouldn't this be something we get ahead of rather than taking a "wait and see" approach?
By the time we would find out for certain it's too ******* late

Some just don't see it that way.
 
Back
Top Bottom