[
Do you think gang members in the inner cities are going to follow your gun laws, or ANY criminals for that matter?
Basically, the only thing you and people like you suggest is to leave the law-abiding citizens in this country to be sitting ducks for the criminals to prey upon, knowing full well that WE are unarmed and defenseless. GREAT idea!!!
Hey, Captain Dumbass, according to the FBI,there were only 201 cases of "justifiable homicide" with guns by civilian owners. So 300 million guns and 32,000 gun fatalities, it doesn't look like you guys are doing a lot of "Crime Stopping" to justify the risk.
You post that and have the audacity to call someone else a dumbass?? LMAO!!!
First of all, please find me anyone who said that guns will stop gun related suicides?? Because that is where you get your bogus numbers. You cling to that number like it is accurate in the discussion. It isn't.
Second of all, your claim is based solely on the number of criminals
shot dead by a citizen with a gun. You completely ignore any use of a gun that only wounded the criminal, held them for the police, or scared them away completely. That is because you are totally dishonest in this discussion. The lowest estimates I have seen show privately owned guns preventing 100k or more crimes annually. Reputable polling has shown that to be very low.
Here is an interesting article from Business Week:
"As with everything else concerning guns in this country, the DGU question prompts divergent answers. At one end of the spectrum, the NRA cites research by Gary Kleck, an accomplished criminologist at Florida State University. Based on self-reporting by survey respondents, Kleck has extrapolated that DGU occurs more than
2 million times a year. Kleck doesn’t suggest that gun owners shoot potential antagonists that often. DGU covers various scenarios, including merely brandishing a weapon and scaring off an aggressor.
At the other end of the spectrum, gun skeptics prefer to
cite the work of David Hemenway, an eminent public-health scholar at Harvard University. Hemenway, who analogizes gun violence to an epidemic and guns to the contagion, argues that Kleck’s research significantly overestimates the frequency of DGU.
The carping back and forth gets pretty technical, but the brief version is that Hemenway believes Kleck includes too many “false positives”: respondents who claim they’ve chased off burglars or rapists with guns but probably are boasting or, worse, categorizing unlawful aggressive conduct as legitimate DGU. Hemenway finds more reliable an annual federal government research project, called the National Crime Victimization Survey, which yields estimates in the neighborhood of 100,000 defensive gun uses per year. Making various reasonable-sounding adjustments, other social scientists have suggested that perhaps a figure somewhere between 250,000 and 370,000 might be
more accurate."