Guy, I was in the Army for 11 years, and my MOS was small weapons repair/supply. I probably know weapons better than you do.
And,no Japan has less guns than American and less violence.
Final point. Most gun deaths are domestic arguments and suicides. Banning gun ownership would reduce those incidents.
Nancy had more guns and ammo than was reasonable. 26 people paid the price for her crazy.
No, I doubt very seriously you know more about guns than I do. And your comments in this thread prove that. Your MOS may have given you technical knowledge of a smal number of firearms that have civilian counterparts. That is all.
Japan has less rape than we do. That is not gun related.
Japan has less domestic violence than we do. That is not gun related.
Japan has less murder using knives than we do. That is not gun related.
Japan has generally less violence than we do. It is a cultural difference.
Japan also has a much less diverse population than we do.
Banning guns would reduce the number of gun suicides. But you have no way of knowing that it would effect the number of suicides. If someone commits suicide using a gun, the only thing you know is that they truly wanted to die. If they want to die, they can accomplish that in many, many ways.
Over 99.9% of gun owners do not kill anyone. Yet you think we should suffer the loss of a constitutional right because of the tiniest percentage?
How many tons of illegal drugs are smuggled into the US every year? If you were to ban all handguns, that would shift to the smuggling of guns, since there is a greater profit margin to be made. so the criminals would still be armed. The honest people would not. So the estimated 100,000 times a year (very low estimate) that an armed citizen stops a crime would dwindle to none.
Oh, and your idea of what is "reasonable" is pure nonsense. What she had was a few boxes of rounds for her guns, and the remnants from times going shooting.
And none of this has anything to do with whether Robert Dowlut should be able to practice law. So you basically lost the argument on 2 fronts.