Now That Democrats Have Made Us a Banana Republic

[Marener]

The court doesn't get to ******* decide that. Insurrection is a crime, which requires a criminal conviction, not some judges deciding it's so.

In insurrection a crime yes or no?

Does it being a crime require conviction to be considered guilty of it, yes or no?

Is it a level of crime requiring a Jury of ones peers, as required by the Constitution to be convicted, yes or no?

If the 14th amendment intended to require a criminal conviction, they should have written that. The fact that they didn't write that, indicates that it's not necessary.

So the courts get to decide.

 

[marvin martian]

I am a zero time Biden voter. Did not even vote for him as VP.

what else do you have?

No one believes that. I'm pretty sure you don't even believe it.

 

[marvin martian]

If the 14th amendment intended to require a criminal conviction, they should have written that. The fact that they didn't write that, indicates that it's not necessary.

So the courts get to decide.

Yup, Texas is already looking at removing Biden from the ballot next year.

You did that!

 

[martybegan]

If the 14th amendment intended to require a criminal conviction, they should have written that. The fact that they didn't write that, indicates that it's not necessary.

So the courts get to decide.

It's implied when they reference the crime of Insurrection, and crimes require other procedures such as trials, juries and convictions.

Is Insurrection a crime, yes or no?

Answer the question.

 

[Marener]

It's implied when they reference the crime of Insurrection, and crimes require other procedures such as trials, juries and convictions.

Is Insurrection a crime, yes or no?

Answer the question.

Jefferson Davis was never convicted of insurrection.

Are you telling me that he was constitutionally eligible of running for president?

 

[Marener]

Yup, Texas is already looking at removing Biden from the ballot next year.

You did that!

lol, sure. When they say they’re “looking into it”, that’s intended to make low information voters think theyre doing something when they aren’t because it would be incredibly stupid for them to try.

Trump said it all the time.

 

[JoeB131]

No, they are jokes. Every one of them. Under the Colorado argument, anyone can be removed for virtually ANYTHING.

Um, no, they are very specific charges over a very specific event.

So, the fact that Biden refuses to do anything about the border is de facto treason, and 32 states run by Repubs can remove Biden from the ballot.

Except Biden is doing things about the border, it's just that our immigration system is broken, and Abbot pulling stunts like busing people all over the country with no warning doesn't help.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

It will be interesting to see which way the rule.

If it is overturned is it due to the 14th not applying to the office of president or due to a lack of a criminal conviction.

Lack of merit. Judges are not supposed to rule in favor of partisan narration, but they did. ILMAO @ "insurrection".

You might read the 1st amendment of our constitution. Trump exercised those rights, and leftards declared it an "insurrection". Where did Trump say bust shit up? No where. Jan 6th is a false flag, dumbshits. You leftists cherry picked "fight like Hell", Trump says it all the time, and many "popular" leftists too, including O'bummer. You leftists get another Russian-gate. Same as your suggestion Trump is racist because what your Democracks made up. Dumb shits are the carriers, "tweet, tweet, squat, squat.

 

[Concerned American]

Where does the text say he needs to be charged with insurrection?

The ruling said he "incited an insurrection." Please link to any official ruling that there was an insurrection to begin with and then we can discuss it. Otherwise, if there was no insurrection, how can anyone be guilty of inciting one, in spite of the fact that no one was charged with or convicted of insurrection. Try again.

 

[Concerned American]

because it would be incredibly stupid for them to try.

As it was when CO tried it, eh?

 

[22lcidw]

lol, sure. When they say they’re “looking into it”, that’s intended to make low information voters think theyre doing something when they aren’t because it would be incredibly stupid for them to try.

Trump said it all the time.

All of this because many of the politicians are in the globalist and owe elites allegiance camp. The young people are ph uked.

 

[Marener]

The ruling said he "incited an insurrection." Please link to any official ruling that there was an insurrection to begin with and then we can discuss it.

The ruling that said he incited an insurrection is an official ruling saying there was an insurrection.

You didnt really think this one through, did you.

 

[Marener]

As it was when CO tried it, eh?

No, more like as stupid as when Texas petitioned the Supreme Court to take away the electoral votes of other states.

 

[Concerned American]

The ruling that said he incited an insurrection is an official ruling saying there was an insurrection.

You didnt really think this one through, did you.

Sure, in your dreams. A court two thousand miles from the jurisdiction where a supposed insurrection was rumored to have occurred determines it was an insurrection. You're extremely misinformed. No court in DC--the jurisdiction where you have fabricated this fantasy--has determined or convicted anyone of insurrection. No insurrection occurred moron. I will be sure to find you and let you eat copious amounts of crow when the SCOTUS overrules this idiocy. Bon apetit.

 

[Crepitus]

Now That Democrats Have Made Us a Banana Republic​

NOPE. We've been calling you kids "banana republicans" for a reason.

YOu are completely bass ackwards again.

 

[Concerned American]

You didnt really think this one through, did you.

Do you understand jurisdiction? Clearly not. Crimes are not dreamed up in the minds of judges. They have to be charged, moron. What shithouse lawyering school awarded you a law degree?

 

[Marener]

Sure, in your dreams. A court two thousand miles from the jurisdiction where a supposed insurrection was rumored to have occurred determines it was an insurrection. You're extremely misinformed. No court in DC--the jurisdiction where you have fabricated this fantasy--has determined or convicted anyone of insurrection. No insurrection occurred moron. I will be sure to find you and let you eat copious amounts of crow when the SCOTUS overrules this idiocy. Bon apetit.

I don’t think you understand what “eat crow” means.

I have never said that SCOTUS will uphold the decision.

 

[Marener]

Do you understand jurisdiction? Clearly not. Crimes are not dreamed up in the minds of judges. They have to be charged, moron. What shithouse lawyering school awarded you a law degree?

Yes, I understand jursidiction. The Supreme Court of Colorado has jurisdiction when it comes to who shows up on state ballots.

 

[Crepitus]

We all know Biden is corrupt…

Made up crap does not hold up in court.

Hasn't supporting tRump taught you anything?

 

[Concerned American]

I have never said that SCOTUS will uphold the decision.

No, you've just tried to justify a ruling that is clearly STOOOOPID. Stupid is as stupid does.