He was far more much closer to the truth than the warren commission was as any serious researcher knows.
unlike the warren commission.stone didnt ignore facts that witnesses said their tesimonys were altered by the warren commission and FBI.a crime they should have all gone to jail for in a world of justice.
Oswald read that the Kennedy parade would be driving by his window, so he took his gun to work, fired three times and blew JFKs brains out
Witnesses place Oswald in the break room 15 minutes before and less than 2 minutes after the assassination.
your arguing with some paid shills on the governments payroll,its not worth wasting your breath on them,they blatantly ignore all facts that prove oswald innocent and that there were multiple shooters,they know they can hide behind the net and get away with lying and ignoring facts.their not worth the effort.
Did, in your opinion, Oswald fire any shots?
He probably did not. Dallas PD checked him for powder residue and found none.
The whole thing is BS. That shitty bolt action rifle with bad scope did not kill JFK.
Not true. The paraffin test showed positive for both hands and negative for the cheek. But this does not say he didn't fire a rifle it just doesn't prove he did not, in other words the paraffin test gives false negatives.
Tests were conducted using the same type of gun with the same type of ammo and some of the shooter showed negative for hands and cheek. Some just the cheek. The point is, the test is unreliable especially in the 60s.
Here is what the FBI said when they tested the gun. But since the FBI, CIA, LBJ, Castro, the mob, were all in on the job I doubt you believe any evidence other then presented in a Stone movie.
FBI tests[edit]
The FBI tests of the Carcano's accuracy showed:
1) FBI firearms expert Robert A. Frazier testified that "It is a very accurate weapon. The targets we fired show that."
[61] From 15 yards (14 m), all three bullets in a test firing landed approximately 2½ inches high, and 1-inch (25 mm) to the right, in the area about the size of a dime.
[62] At 100 yards (91 m), the test shots landed 2½ to 5 inches (130 mm) high, within a 3 to 5-inch (130 mm) circle. Frazier testified that the scope's high variation would actually work in the shooter's favor: with a target moving away from the shooter, no lead correction would have been necessary to follow the target. "At that range, at that distance, 175 feet (53 m) to 265 feet (81 m),
[63]with this rifle and that telescopic sight, I would not have allowed any lead — I would not have made any correction for lead merely to hit a target of that size."
2) The rifle couldn't be perfectly sighted in using the scope (i.e., thereby eliminating the above overshoot completely) without installing two metal shims (small metal plates), which were not present when the rifle arrived for testing, and were never found.
[64] Frazier testified that there was "a rather severe scrape" on the scope tube, and that the sight could have been bent or damaged. He was unable to determine when the defect occurred before the FBI received the rifle and scope on November 27, 1963.