Notice how when three or four women accuse Cesar Chavez

[drudge X]

Like I said, TDS immediately after second sentence.

 

[Mashmont]

Who made a credible accusation of rape against Bill Clinton?

The only accusation of rape came from Juanita Broaddrick and it was in no way credible. Right after the incident, Broaddrick told both her husband and her lover that Clinton raped her. But she continued to work on the Clinton campaign, and volunteered for serveral events.

Years later, during the Paul Jones trial, Broaddrick filed a sworn affidavit to the effect that Clinton never raped her. Ken Starr threatened to charge Broaddrick with perjury if she didn't recant her affidavit and accuse Clinton of rape, and immunity from prosecution if she accused the President. Since Starr had already jailed Susan MacDougal for refusing to testify against Clinton, Broaddrick changed her story yet again.

So which story is true? The story she told her husband and her lover when it happened, as a cover for her infidelity? Her sworn affidavit for the Jones Trial, given voluntarily? Or the coerced accusation she made when threatened with jail time???

My money would be on the sworn affidavit, given with no threats or duress, at the Jones Trial.

https://www.npr.org/2016/10/09/497291071/a-brief-history-of-juanita-broaddrick-the-woman-accusing-bill-clinton-of-rape#:~:text=Broaddrick%20had%20no%20witnesses%20but,and%20her%20campaign%20have%20said

Didn’t Stormy Daniels change her story?

Clinton raped Broaddrick and did sex acts with a subordinate while president. Yet you people defend him.

 

[drudge X]

We on the left immediately acknowledge them and multiple municipalities begin the process of removing his name from public sites.

But long after Trump is accused by 30 women of rape and sexual misconduct, after a tape of him bragging about molesting women is played repeatedly on national media, after he is adjudicated to be guilty of sexual assault in a court of law, after he is accused in a sworn statement to the FBI for having raped the accuser when she was a thirteen year old girl, after his name appears over a million times in the emails and records of a globally known pedophile and child sex trafficker — the Republicans name an airport after him.

We on the left immediately acknowledge… HAHAHA. How long have you guys been shielding Weinstein?

 

[Augustine_]

We on the left immediately acknowledge… HAHAHA. How long have you guys been shielding Weinstein?

Recall that the right completely lost its mind over the left wing movement that took Weinstein down.

 

[Rawley]

We on the left immediately acknowledge them and multiple municipalities begin the process of removing his name from public sites.

But long after Trump is accused by 30 women of rape and sexual misconduct, after a tape of him bragging about molesting women is played repeatedly on national media, after he is adjudicated to be guilty of sexual assault in a court of law, after he is accused in a sworn statement to the FBI for having raped the accuser when she was a thirteen year old girl, after his name appears over a million times in the emails and records of a globally known pedophile and child sex trafficker — the Republicans name an airport after him.

Rent Free. 24/7/365. It truly is remarkable to watch.

 

[drudge X]

Recall that the right completely lost its mind over the left wing movement that took Weinstein down.

Moving goal post.
How long have Democrats been shielding Weinstein?

 

[Augustine_]

Moving goal post.
How long have Democrats been shielding Weinstein?

Tell us. When did Democrats shield Weinstein?

 

[drudge X]

Tell us. When did Democrats shield Weinstein?

Every Democrat close to him knew or have very high suspicion and said nothing. That’s shielding a rapist.

 

[Augustine_]

Every Democrat close to him knew or have very high suspicion and said nothing. That’s shielding a rapist.

By that logic so did every republican in his circle. Why did you rebel against the left wing movement that brought him down?

 

[drudge X]

By that logic so did every republican in his circle. Why did you rebel against the left wing movement that brought him down?

Nice try. From the leftist own bible CNN. Start a different thread if you want to talk about rebellion and I will be more than happy to destroy your argument.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/06/politics/harvey-weinstein-democrats

 

[Lockback]

We on the left immediately acknowledge them and multiple municipalities begin the process of removing his name from public sites.

But long after Trump is accused by 30 women of rape and sexual misconduct, after a tape of him bragging about molesting women is played repeatedly on national media, after he is adjudicated to be guilty of sexual assault in a court of law, after he is accused in a sworn statement to the FBI for having raped the accuser when she was a thirteen year old girl, after his name appears over a million times in the emails and records of a globally known pedophile and child sex trafficker — the Republicans name an airport after him.

 

[BS Filter]

We on the left immediately acknowledge them and multiple municipalities begin the process of removing his name from public sites.

But long after Trump is accused by 30 women of rape and sexual misconduct, after a tape of him bragging about molesting women is played repeatedly on national media, after he is adjudicated to be guilty of sexual assault in a court of law, after he is accused in a sworn statement to the FBI for having raped the accuser when she was a thirteen year old girl, after his name appears over a million times in the emails and records of a globally known pedophile and child sex trafficker — the Republicans name an airport after him.

Oh yeah, y'all are so moral and upstanding. Funny.

 

[drudge X]

Astonishing isn’t it? Democrats were shielding Weinstein for decades but brazenly said leftists would never protect a rapist.

 

[Lockback]

Astonishing isn’t it? Democrats were shielding Weinstein for decades but brazenly said leftists would never protect a rapist.

Such phonies.
Such hypocrites.
Completely without shame, too.

 

[Augustine_]

Nice try. For on the leftist own bible CNN

https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/06/politics/harvey-weinstein-democrats

Who was protecting him? The article says nothing about that.

 

[DGS49]

There has not been a single credible accusation of illegal sexual misconduct against Donald Trump. Not one. The woman in the dressing room was preposterous, as everyone with a three digit IQ knows.

He never "bragged about" grabbing women by their private parts, again, as every half-way intelligent person understands. He said that when you are rich, famous, and powerful, you can take advantage of women. That's it. It's the truth, and nobody disputes it.

Trump has never been accused of pedophilia or anything close to it in connection with Epstein. The woman whose bullshit accusation came to light a few weeks ago was discredited a long, long time ago, and withdrew the accusation.

Donald Trump is and was, in some ways, not nice. Why is it necessary to lie about him?

 

[drudge X]

Such phonies.
Such hypocrites.
Completely without shame, too.

From my post in the other Chavez thread.

They believe they have this aura of infallible surrounding them.

Everything they say is correct.
Every idea they come up with is 100% correct. Every decision they made is 100% sound decision making.
Every claim they make, whether substantiated or not must be spot on.
Every accusation they make is valid regardless if there is evidence or not.

When reality hits them, they don't know how to respond as shown with Chavez, Epstein, and Weinstein.

 

[Doc7505]

Because the impeachment failed? How wild that today's GOP is completely fine with cheating on multiple wives, banging prostitutes, and protecting pedophiles from prosecution when back then you thought an affair with an intern was enough to end a Presidency.

<~~~~~~~~~>
So do the impeachments of Donald Trump.

 

[drudge X]

Who was protecting him? The article says nothing about that.

Then you have selective reading

 

[Augustine_]

Then you have selective reading

The word "protect" doesn't even appear in the article