Notice how when three or four women accuse Cesar Chavez

From my post in the other Chavez thread.

They believe they have this aura of infallible surrounding them.

Everything they say is correct.
Every idea they come up with is 100% correct. Every decision they made is 100% sound decision making.
Every claim they make, whether substantiated or not must be spot on.
Every accusation they make is valid regardless if there is evidence or not.

When reality hits them, they don't know how to respond as shown with Chavez, Epstein, and Weinstein.
i-TgxcMhg-S.jpg
 
lying to Congress under oath was.


no body ever told you that?

Clinton didn't lie to Congress. He never testified to Congress. He testified to the Grand Jury.
Didn’t Stormy Daniels change her story?

Clinton raped Broaddrick and did sex acts with a subordinate while president. Yet you people defend him.

No, Stormy Daniels did not change her story. She never claimed that Trump raped her. She did say his dick was really small, he's very fat, and a he's lousy lay. But did we expect anything different? I mean look at those tiny hands and short fingers. And guys who are that selfish and entitled are never good in bed.

Clinton is a man whore. Nobody has ever claimed otherwise. But there is no evidence that he raped anyone.

How do you know he raped Broaddrick??? Were you there? Because that's the only way you'd know for sure. You believe he did it because you WANT to believe it and for no other reason. Broaddrick is simply not credible because the ONLY time she spoke about it without fear of repercussions - either fear for her other relationships or fear of jail, was the affidavit given given in the Jones case where she said she was not raped.

Nobody wants to defend him, but when you make false claims about him, we're not given a choice.
 
The word "protect" doesn't even appear in the article :itsok:
You have selective reading problem.

It seems like Weinstein’s boorish behavior – to put it mildly – was an open secret in the circles he ran in. The prevailing sentiment when the New York Times published its piece was not “WOW!” but rather “Finally!”

That’s important. If everyone around Weinstein knew about his inappropriate conduct around women, why were so many Democratic politicians willing to pal around with him and/or accept his money?
 
You have selective reading problem.

It seems like Weinstein’s boorish behavior – to put it mildly – was an open secret in the circles he ran in. The prevailing sentiment when the New York Times published its piece was not “WOW!” but rather “Finally!”

That’s important. If everyone around Weinstein knew about his inappropriate conduct around women, why were so many Democratic politicians willing to pal around with him and/or accept his money?
You should ask them. Maybe you'll reveal that they were protecting him.
 
Clinton didn't lie to Congress. He never testified to Congress. He testified to the Grand Jury.


No, Stormy Daniels did not change her story. She never claimed that Trump raped her. She did say his dick was really small, he's very fat, and a he's lousy lay. But did we expect anything different? I mean look at those tiny hands and short fingers. And guys who are that selfish and entitled are never good in bed.
You're fascinated with Trump's dick. Admit it. You want him so badly ... it drives you nuts that he's with Melania instead of you.

i-fd6KWDK.gif


"Oh, my God, she wants him so bad!!!"
 
^ Another poster fails to point out when Democrats protected Weinstein
That's because they ALWAYS were. Take a look at all the democrats fawning over that piece of shit.
 
15th post
millions of files have been released by the Trump admin .. how many files were released by the last dem admin .. answer ...0 ..
Less than 1% according to the last count from the DOJ themselves. There are terrabytes of data being redacted and scrapped as we speak.
 
Back
Top Bottom