Not Biden: It's Democrat Policy

[Darkwind]

That one is lying scum, an escapee from the prision camp called Canada.

True, and funny!

 

[Ringtone]

As an aside, I consider myself a Zionist.


I've been to the Holy Land, and have seen first hand what these people have accomplished.

So do I.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Zionist policy of apartheid?

I told you he was lying scum.



"I later went on to do a PhD at Cambridge and to teach Arabic and Islamic Studies at Newcastle University . Naturally, I am the author of several books and hundreds of articles in this field. I say all that to show that I am well informed in Middle Eastern affairs and that, for that reason, I am shocked and disheartened by the EUSA motion and vote.

I am shocked for a simple reason: there is not and has never been a system of apartheid in Israel . That is not my opinion, that is fact that can be tested against reality by any Edinburgh student, should he or she choose to visit Israel to see for themselves. Let me spell this out, since I have the impression that those members of EUSA who voted for this motion are absolutely clueless in matters concerning Israel, and that they are, in all likelihood, the victims of extremely biased propaganda coming from the anti-Israel lobby.

Being anti-Israel is not in itself objectionable. But I’m not talking about ordinary criticism of Israel . I’m speaking of a hatred that permits itself no boundaries in the lies and myths it pours out. Thus, Israel is repeatedly referred to as a “Nazi” state. In what sense is this true, even as a metaphor? Where are the Israeli concentration camps? The einzatsgruppen? The SS? The Nuremberg Laws? The Final Solution? None of these things nor anything remotely resembling them exists in Israel , precisely because the Jews, more than anyone on earth, understand what Nazism stood for."

Scottish Professor Speaks Out Against Boycott of Israel | United with Israel

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/55250/dr-denis-maceoins-letter-edinburgh-university-students-association

 

[Donald H]

It is well beyond Hussein Obama



"Brezinski Calls for Obama to Shoot Down Israeli Jets; "A Liberty in Reverse"
Zbigniew Brzezinski suggests that Barack Obama do more than just refuse to support an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites -- the American president must give the order to shoot down Israeli aircraft as they cross Iraqi airspace:
Brezinski Calls for Obama to Shoot Down Israeli Jets; "A Liberty in Reverse"



This is Democrat policy.

It appears that Obama is of the opinion that further US/Zionist aggression against Iran is just going to harden their resolve to attain the same protection N.K. has obtained.

And too, it's now been decided by Iran that they will become a major part of the alliance being formed between China/Russia/India/ etc.

In the near future it's quite possible that Iran will be under the nuclear umbrella of it's allies.

Your attempt to insult others is childish and you won't get me to stoop to that level.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I have been to both Israel and to Jordan.


I wonder how many realize the debt Jordan owes to Israel....

"Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Was it true that in 1970 Syria tried to invade Jordan, and was only prevented from doing that by Israel?​

Yes.

During the civil war between PLO led Palestinians and the Hashemite kingdom, under the late King Hussein (which included the bloody events of black September and lead to the PLOs migration to South Lebanon), Syria, under pretense of assisting the Palestinians, launched a land invasion into the North of Jordan.

King Hussein, whose forces were spread too thin, secretly contacted the White House in request of aid.

Nixon wouldn't hear of it, the U.S was stuck knee deep in the Vietnam War,
and a conflict in another country they couldn't point at on the map was the last thing the American public would hear of.

Henry Kissinger, then Secretary of State, came up with a surprising concept: reach out to Israel for assistance.

In a low profile channel, Prime Minister Golda Meir, and Defense Minister Moshe Dayan were approached with the request.

(The liaison was Israeli ambassador to the U.S at the time, Yitzhak Rabin, this was later a pinnacle point in the personal friendship that grew between him and King Hussein)

Kissinger made it clear that Hussein is in dire need, what little forces Jordan could spare were no match for the Syrian armored divisions, and they were taking significant losses on the ground and in the air, not affecting Syrian progress deep into Jordan substantially enough.

He also explained why the U.S could not act directly.

Dayan and Meir agreed almost instantly requesting confirmation that Hussein would agree to accept such help.

Kissinger reached out, a reluctant but desperate Hussein agreed, requesting only that the Israelis act in a way that would be somehow kept under the radar.

Within less than a day, the IAF commander, sent a wing of 4 Israeli F-4E Phantom jets on an insanely dangerous mission:

To fly low over the charging Syrian land divisions, throughout the entire northern Jordan front, making sure that the Syrians can positively ID the planes as Israeli Phantoms. The mission was carried out with the wing making sure to deliver several supersonic booms along its route.

IsraeliâPalestinian Conflict: Was it true that in 1970 Syria tried to invade Jordan, and was only prevented from doing that by Israel?

Answer (1 of 5): As a very raw recruit in the 188th Armored Brigade station in the Golan heights in 1970, I remember the Brigade being placed adjacent to the three-way border between Israel, Syrian and Jordan, in position to interdict any Syrian attempt to intervene in “Black September”, when the...

www.quora.com

Within hours Damascus began receiving reports of "mass waves of Israeli air forces attacking Syrian forces all over the front."

A few hours later the invasion was at a stand still, followed by an immediate retreat back to Syria.

The events in Jordan erupted on Sep 17th.

Syria invaded on Sep 20th.

Hussein reached out on the 21st.

Israel acted on the 22nd.

The invasion was aborted on the 23rd.

Israel managed to help out Hussein as he requested:
Without firing a single bullet.

Hussein unofficially confirmed this record of events in 1995, a year after the peace agreement, they were later officially confirmed to the NY times on 2001.

The event brought to the end, de facto, of Israeli Jordanian hostilities, Jordan did not participate in the Yom Kippur war in 73, and served to secretly, but officially establish an Israeli-US strategic alliance in a way that was rewarded 3 years later in that same war.

For more info:
Page on wikispaces.com
Black September, The PLO's attempt to take over Jordan in 1970
http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/p...
Page on ndu.edu
Israel–Jordan relations

A truly unique event in Mid East history.

The simple answer is while Israel didnt physically interfere outside of fighter planes flying over Syrian troops, Israel made it known then and now, that it will not allow foreign forces to to to take over Jordan. Jordan is a stable border for Israel and Israel will not allow anyone to change that​

IsraeliâPalestinian Conflict: Was it true that in 1970 Syria tried to invade Jordan, and was only prevented from doing that by Israel?

Answer (1 of 5): As a very raw recruit in the 188th Armored Brigade station in the Golan heights in 1970, I remember the Brigade being placed adjacent to the three-way border between Israel, Syrian and Jordan, in position to interdict any Syrian attempt to intervene in “Black September”, when the...

www.quora.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's fair to separate the people of Israel and Jewish people from the Zionist faction that is the cause of all the trouble.

All the trouble?
No blame for Islam?

 

[PoliticalChic]

• Persuasive article from Gatestone ......but this is no change from Hussein Obama's insistence on the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism being guaranteed nuclear weapons.​

• ​

• ​

• "Biden Is No Friend of Israel​

• The real crime, one that represents a serious breach of the long-standing intelligence-sharing arrangements between the US and Israel, is that one of President Joe Biden's senior officials has been willing to betray the trust of such a close ally.
• At a time when tensions are already running high between Iran and the West over the stalled nuclear talks, there are quite justifiable concerns in Israel that the leak will prompt Iran to exact revenge by attacking Israeli targets, even if it later transpires that Israel was not responsible for the assassination.
• The timing of the leak also indicates an underlying willingness on the part of the Biden administration to undermine Israel when, in public, the White House is seeking to portray itself as an ally of Israel, as indicated by its recent seeming decision not to remove the IRGC from the US list of designated terrorist organisations.
• As for motivation, it is unclear if the leak was deliberate, to harm Israel, or from not fully appreciating the jeopardy it could potentially cause Israel, an act which would reflect the Biden administration's profound lack of understanding as to what is at stake with the entire Iran issue."
• Biden Is No Friend of Israel

Some dunce put a disagree emotion on the post......but that fool won't be able to answer this:


What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

 

[Ringtone]

It is well beyond Hussein Obama



"Brezinski Calls for Obama to Shoot Down Israeli Jets; "A Liberty in Reverse"
Zbigniew Brzezinski suggests that Barack Obama do more than just refuse to support an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites -- the American president must give the order to shoot down Israeli aircraft as they cross Iraqi airspace:
Brezinski Calls for Obama to Shoot Down Israeli Jets; "A Liberty in Reverse"



This is Democrat policy.

Indeed, let's regard the future of the Democratic Party:

Congressional resolutions honor and commemorate, condemn, and even bluster. Rarely do they endorse a false conception of history as a means of conducting political warfare against an American ally.​

​

House Resolution 1123, introduced by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), does just that. It also serves as an ominous warning about the future of the wider Democratic Party as its progressive wing organizes and grows in anticipation of a changing of the guard.​

​

Another such warning came a week after Tlaib’s resolution, when on May 23, Jewish Insider revealed that the office of Jamaal Bowman (D), a "Squad"-aligned New York congressman, had been groveling to the Democratic Socialists of America to win back its favor. Specifically, the DSA believed Bowman’s increasingly heated attacks on Israel were not extreme enough to make him a good socialist. A staffer wrote of the list of “demands” the DSA had presented Bowman with and explained that the congressman was complying, first by opposing a resolution supporting peace between Israel and its neighbors and then promising that “the next time we have something like a standalone Iron Dome vote” on funding for Israel’s ability to defend its civilians from air attacks, “you will see Rep. Bowman vote no.”​

​

The muted response to these stories is further evidence that the aging Democratic Party leadership has been sufficiently cowed by the generation of Bernie Sanders acolytes preparing to replace them. Both stories, in fact, deserved attention.​

​

Democrats go to war against Israel

The party's future is being built by its extremist wing.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[Donald H]

As an aside, I consider myself a Zionist.

That explains a lot of what I've been wondering about. You aren't but at least you 'consider'.
Those asking me to explain what a Zionist is can ask you.

I will regard them as separate from the normal and decent Israelis or Jewish people.

 

[Stryder50]

Regardless of what American or Americans are to blame, the situation that's being created should be discussed. Assume the D's are responsible due to them holding the presidency.

It has the effect of putting the Zionist cause in a difficult situation the need to attack Iran, or even just the perceived or manufactured need.

Does Iran have nuclear arms ambitions?

A Zionist state attack on Iran is going to provoke them into a devastating counter attack and that would almost certainly result in the use of nuclear weapons by the Zionist regime.

America has a great incentive to oppose Zionist ambitions, and Biden is most likely being advised on the best course of action.
He's almost certainly not capable of making important decisions by himself. That would be true for America's war against Russia too.



That speaks very loudly for America's position, which would be above Biden's pay grade to resist.
Doddering old fools don't make decisions for America that could lead to such disasterous consequences.

"Zionists" is psuedo-liberal, socialist/communist, American insurectionist neo-Nazi new, code term for "Kill all the Jews".

 

[Donald H]

"Zionists" is psuedo-liberal, socialist/communist, American insurectionist neo-Nazi new, code term for "Kill all the Jews".

May I buy you too a nice big ice cream cone?
What flavour do you like best?

 

[Esdraelon]

Does Iran have nuclear arms ambitions?

Is this a rhetorical question? No nation endures the depth and breadth of sanctions against their populations for the right to simply generate electricity and pharmaceuticals for cancer treatments. OF COURSE they are working on a bomb. Once they have it they will basically own the Persian Gulf and Straits of Hormuz. Every politician around the world and ESPECIALLY Barack Obama should be held personally responsible for any suffering that bomb causes. If Iran uses a nuke against Israel then I pray that the Mossad will administer justice where it is warranted.

 

[Esdraelon]

May I buy you too a nice big ice cream cone?
What flavour do you like best?

Aww, don't be snarky, it's okay to be a Jew-hater in today's America. Most of DC fits that description. Just don't be surprised when that little nation wipes the grin off the faces of ALL of their enemies, including Jew-hating Americans.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Is this a rhetorical question? No nation endures the depth and breadth of sanctions against their populations for the right to simply generate electricity and pharmaceuticals for cancer treatments. OF COURSE they are working on a bomb. Once they have it they will basically own the Persian Gulf and Straits of Hormuz. Every politician around the world and ESPECIALLY Barack Obama should be held personally responsible for any suffering that bomb causes. If Iran uses a nuke against Israel then I pray that the Mossad will administer justice where it is warranted.

 

[Donald H]

All the trouble?
No blame for Islam?

No, I don't consider Islam the cause of the trouble we're speaking of between the Zionist regime and Islam.
OBL stated his beliefs to be one of the two reasons why he masterminded the 911 attacks.

That is the perception of a very large faction of the Islamic world.

I greatly fear that a US and/or Zionist hit on Iran will bring similar revenge attacks.

Islam could take an extremist position that the most extremist attack on America is warranted.

Cooperation with Europe, Russia, and other concerned parties is the logical approach for America now.

Trump's foolish move has only resulted in a much worse situation now that Iran has gained the ability to wipe the Zionist regime off the map.

Iran is a peaceful nation and war is not their ambition. They have only ever been reactive to US/Zionist aggression.

 

[Ringtone]

It appears that Obama is of the opinion that further US/Zionist aggression against Iran is just going to harden their resolve to attain the same protection N.K. has obtained.

And too, it's now been decided by Iran that they will become a major part of the alliance being formed between China/Russia/India/ etc.

In the near future it's quite possible that Iran will be under the nuclear umbrella of it's allies.

Your attempt to insult others is childish and you won't get me to stoop to that level.

Meanwhile, back to reality. . . .

Iranian Aggression:

. . . He added that “even during the severe economic and political crisis in Lebanon, Iran and Hezbollah are entangling [its] citizens in a front against Israel.”​

​

The Israeli premier went on to caution “Lebanon and its army” that they “must take responsibility for what is happening in their backyard,” even if the perpetrators of the recent rocket launches hailed from a Palestinian organization, belonged to a dissident group or acted independently.​

​

“The State of Israel will not accept firing at its territory,” he stressed.​

​

Turning to Iran’s deadly suicide-drone assault on the Israeli-managed Mercer Street tanker on July 29, he commended the G-7 countries for having condemned the attack, which was proven by the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) to have been carried out by the Islamic Republic. While on that topic, he invoked Iran’s new president, Ebrahim Raisi, the “‘hangman of Tehran,’ a brutal extremist even for the Iranian regime,” and cited “Iranian aggression throughout the Middle East—on land, at sea and in the air.”​

​

Iran, he said—reiterating the mantra of his predecessor—“constitutes a clear danger to the stability of the region and the peace of the world, and the world must not accept this. The Iranians need to understand that it is impossible to continue running amok without paying a price.”. . .​

​

Iranian Aggression and Israel’s Fragile Coalition - Algemeiner.com

JNS.org - At the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting on Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett addressed the country’s security situation. Referring to the Israel Defense Forces attack on Hamas targets in Gaza following the latest wave of incendiary balloons, he warned the terrorist...

www.algemeiner.com

 

[Donald H]

Aww, don't be snarky, it's okay to be a Jew-hater in today's America. Most of DC fits that description. Just don't be surprised when that little nation wipes the grin off the faces of ALL of their enemies, including Jew-hating Americans.

improve your behaviour or you will be ignored. If you don't care then continue as you are.

 

[Donald H]

Meanwhile, back to reality. . . .

Iranian Aggression:

. . . He added that “even during the severe economic and political crisis in Lebanon, Iran and Hezbollah are entangling [its] citizens in a front against Israel.”​

​

The Israeli premier went on to caution “Lebanon and its army” that they “must take responsibility for what is happening in their backyard,” even if the perpetrators of the recent rocket launches hailed from a Palestinian organization, belonged to a dissident group or acted independently.​

​

“The State of Israel will not accept firing at its territory,” he stressed.​

​

Turning to Iran’s deadly suicide-drone assault on the Israeli-managed Mercer Street tanker on July 29, he commended the G-7 countries for having condemned the attack, which was proven by the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) to have been carried out by the Islamic Republic. While on that topic, he invoked Iran’s new president, Ebrahim Raisi, the “‘hangman of Tehran,’ a brutal extremist even for the Iranian regime,” and cited “Iranian aggression throughout the Middle East—on land, at sea and in the air.”​

​

Iran, he said—reiterating the mantra of his predecessor—“constitutes a clear danger to the stability of the region and the peace of the world, and the world must not accept this. The Iranians need to understand that it is impossible to continue running amok without paying a price.”. . .​

​

Iranian Aggression and Israel’s Fragile Coalition - Algemeiner.com

JNS.org - At the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting on Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett addressed the country’s security situation. Referring to the Israel Defense Forces attack on Hamas targets in Gaza following the latest wave of incendiary balloons, he warned the terrorist...

www.algemeiner.com

America is at least now quite divided because of the realization that Zionist aggression has been made obvious to the rest of the world and it can be defended.

That's mostly due to Obama's voice being the loudest and the most credible voice coming out of America. And also the fact that any voice opposed to Trump's idiocy has automatic credibility.

Hussein Obama indeed!

 

[Stryder50]

May I buy you too a nice big ice cream cone?
What flavour do you like best?

By "too" do you mean "also", or "two"(2)?

Start with a waffle cone, hard packed vanilla, dipped into hot chocolate, coated with chopped pecan (or pistachios).

But you'll have to come here, I'm not traveling to "there".

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, I don't consider Islam the cause of the trouble we're speaking of between the Zionist regime and Islam.
OBL stated his beliefs to be one of the two reasons why he masterminded the 911 attacks.

That is the perception of a very large faction of the Islamic world.

I greatly fear that a US and/or Zionist hit on Iran will bring similar revenge attacks.

Islam could take an extremist position that the most extremist attack on America is warranted.

Cooperation with Europe, Russia, and other concerned parties is the logical approach for America now.

Trump's foolish move has only resulted in a much worse situation now that Iran has gained the ability to wipe the Zionist regime off the map.

Iran is a peaceful nation and war is not their ambition. They have only ever been reactive to US/Zionist aggression.

I don't consider Islam the cause of the trouble we're speaking of between the Zionist regime and Islam.

Once a land is ruled by Islam, no take-backs, right?
Why is that not part of the problem?

That is the perception of a very large faction of the Islamic world.

Yeah, primitive culture, primitive beliefs.

I greatly fear that a US and/or Zionist hit on Iran will bring similar revenge attacks.

That'd be awful! Islam has been so peaceful lately.

Trump's foolish move has only resulted in a much worse situation now that Iran has gained the ability to wipe the Zionist regime off the map.

Before Trump, Iran was all about loving us and Israel, right?

Iran is a peaceful nation and war is not their ambition.

Norm? Norm MacDonald? Is that you? I heard you were dead.