Winco
Diamond Member
- Nov 1, 2019
- 21,291
- 15,918
- 2,290
11) Pardons for contributions
What Pardons?Your concession is noted
Address it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
11) Pardons for contributions
What Pardons?Your concession is noted
I responded to an article posted by someone that claimed Hillary's emails caused the deaths of agents in China. When I read the article, it cited an article by the times as the reason for the headline. Problem was that the Times didn't say it was caused by the emails. So the poster came back with an article that said Hillary had confidential documents on her email server wich again is NOT saying it caused 20 deaths in China.Moving the goal post now, I figured.
I'm not your Google servant, you said they weren't factual. You lost your concession is already notedWhat Pardons?
Address it.
I did my homework. I read your article. Your article didn't support its own headline. It's called clickbait.I proved to you that I did not make it up .Do your own homework if you don't like my sources, kid.
I underlined what you said and I found what you asked then you changed what you were asking so yeahI responded to an article posted by someone that claimed Hillary's emails caused the deaths of agents in China. When I read the article, it cited an article by the times as the reason for the headline. Problem was that the Times didn't say it was caused by the emails. So the poster came back with an article that said Hillary had confidential documents on her email server wich again is NOT saying it caused 20 deaths in China.
Goalposts where moved, not by me I'm afraid.
Just reread the thread I was responding to. You are right I did move the goalpost by not formulating my question properly.I underlined what you said and I found what you asked then you changed what you were asking so yeah
Moved by you
Well at least you admit it. There's hope for you yetJust reread the thread I was responding to. You are right I did move the goalpost by not formulating my question properly.
And if the President has 5 years to turn them over to archives from the time he leaves office and he's been out for 2 years then who has legal right to hold and maintain those records?Ah using the archives, I'll return the favor.
In 1978, Congress passed the Presidential Records Act (PRA), which changed the legal status of Presidential and Vice Presidential materials. Under the PRA, the official records of the President and his staff are owned by the United States, not by the President.
- The Archivist is required to take custody of these records when the President leaves office, and to maintain them in a Federal depository.
- These records are eligible for access under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) five years after the President leaves office.
- The President may restrict access to specific kinds of information for up to 12 years after he leaves office, but after that point the records are reviewed for FOIA exemptions only.
- This legislation took effect on January 20, 1981, and the records of the Reagan administration were the first to be administered under this law.
- Staff at the Reagan Library, the George H. W. Bush Library, the William J. Clinton Library, and the George W. Bush Library can provide additional information regarding access to Presidential records in their collections.
- Staff at the libraries can provide additional information regarding access to Presidential records in their collections.
Seems an important step was not followed here.
Whataboutism is a logical fallacy called an Appeal to Hypocrisy. It's something everybody in their normal life is confronted with, especially if they have kids. It's the idea that if you do something wrong and you can point out someone else doing the same thing wrong it all of a sudden becomes acceptable.lol.."Whataboutism" is merely the layman [or socially educated] synonym for "Precedent" which is the academic term...
however, if you for some reason prefer "whataboutism" to "precedent" I/we all would understand, but both are to show there is "standing" [also a synonym for both the academic term and yours] for such a practice or exercise.
... to make sure you did not miss the point, your above claim means the same as saying ""Precedent at its finest" or "long standing practice at its finest"
It's called intellectual honesty. I am capable of questioning myself, and admitting fault. An ability I've noticed is severely lacking in nearly anybody on this site.Well at least you admit it. There's hope for you yet
Or that, you and leftist do something wrong and get away with itWhataboutism is a logical fallacy called an Appeal to Hypocrisy. It's something everybody in their normal life is confronted with, especially if they have kids. It's the idea that if you do something wrong and you can point out someone else doing the same thing wrong it all of a sudden becomes acceptable.
It doesn't work for my daughter. It doesn't work for my employees, and it sure as hell doesn't work legally.
If you were truly honest you wouldn't have left out the parts from the PRA you posted after mineIt's called intellectual honesty. I am capable of questioning myself, and admitting fault. An ability I've noticed is severely lacking in nearly anybody on this site.
Jan 6 was a failed coup. and speaks for it's self. The rest you mentioned weren't a concern unless they made terroristic threats or otherwise presented a verifiable, valid threat.What do you think Biden and his DoJ have been doing?
Trump
Jan 6 protesters
Parents at school board meetings protesting CRT and Drag Queens
Covid Truthers
Free Speech advocates
Pro Life advocates
2A advocates
Fascism is already here and its you DEMONRATS bringing it ya idiot
The problem is the ex-president doesn't have 5 years to turn them over.And if the President has 5 years to turn them over to archives from the time he leaves office and he's been out for 2 years then who has legal right to hold and maintain those records?
Trump
Mar-O-Lago is NOT a federal depository and Trump is NOT the Archivist.
- The Archivist is required to take custody of these records when the President leaves office, and to maintain them in a Federal depository.
Failed coup my ass. Chaz/Chop was a failed coup during you leftist "summer of love" where people were raped, robbed and murdered. Like Ashli Babbit was murderedJan 6 was a failed coup. and speaks for it's self. The rest you mentioned weren't a concern unless they made terroristic threats or otherwise presented a verifiable, valid threat.
There you go being intellectually dishonestThe problem is the ex-president doesn't have 5 years to turn them over.
Mar-O-Lago is NOT a federal depository and Trump is NOT the Archivist.
If you were truly honest you wouldn't have left out the parts from the PRA you posted after mine
This is me defending the decision of Comey to reopen the investigation into Clinton a few weeks before the general election. I knew it was damaging politically and it didn't matter. Because to me the rule of law is more important than my politics. That is honesty. So NO this leftists didn't say that what Clinton did was okay.No, I believe politics should not drive decisions made by the FBI. Unfortunately, when you make a decision during an election year you will influence the elections for one party or another regardless. At that point, I believe it's the duty of the FBI to just tell the truth. In the case of Clinton, Comey first came out saying that Clinton was in the clear. The problem was. Potential additional evidence was discovered after that statement. Comey could sit on it, in which case, the GOP would blame him for trying to cover up evidence if it leaked. Which it would surely do. Or he could immediately release it. In an attempt to cut off the accusation. And try to expedite the evaluation of the potential evidence. Now, I think there is nothing wrong with making decisions based on what you consider the best of 2 shitty options.
Literally highlighted it for you and linked it straight for the Archives own site.This is me defending the decision of Comey to reopen the investigation into Clinton a few weeks before the general election. I knew it was damaging politically and it didn't matter. Because to me the rule of law is more important than my politics. That is honesty. So NO this leftists didn't say that what Clinton did was okay.
And the reason I didn't post the PRA you did is that NOWHERE in it does it say that it is ex-president who has custody of the documents if he leaves office. But the ARCHIVIST. You start from the wrong premise.
There you go being intellectually dishonest
- Establishes in law that any incumbent Presidential records (whether textual or electronic) held on courtesy storage by the Archivist remain in the exclusive legal custody of the President and that any request or order for access to such records must be made to the President, not NARA.
- Establishes a process by which the President may restrict and the public may obtain access to these records after the President leaves office; specifically, the PRA allows for public access to Presidential records through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) beginning five years after the end of the Administration, but allows the President to invoke as many as six specific restrictions to public access for up to twelve years.
You really are dumb aren't yaPresidential Records (44 U.S.C. Chapter 22)
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 22) § 2201. Definitions § 2202. Ownership of Presidential records § 2203. Management and custody of Presidential records § 2204. Restrictions on access to Presidential records § 2205. Exceptions to restricted access § 2206. Regulations § 2207. Vice-Presidential records § Note...www.archives.gov
(B) does not include any documentary materials that are (i) official records of an agency (as defined in section 552(e) of title 5, United States Code; (ii) personal records; (iii) stocks of publications and stationery; or (iv) extra copies of documents produced only for convenience of reference, when such copies are clearly so identified.
So in other words NOT intelligence material.
(g)(1) Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms upon the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President. The Archivist shall have an affirmative duty to make such records available to the public as rapidly and completely as possible consistent with the provisions of this chapter.
In other words NOT at Mar-O lago.
These are exerps from the actual law found by clicking the hyperlink in the SYNOPSIS your link provides
Read it all before you question my intellectual honesty.