. Most would agree to a common sense plan for insuring all, but even that is fought by the donor class who actually denies the people their right to due process on such matters.So, you think that nothing should be enshrined as a right unless 100% of the population agrees with it.If the US collectively want to decide to extend certain rights to US citizens then they can can't they?
Isn't that what the constitution did?
It's the "collectively want to decide" bit that contains the poison. What you mean by that, is that the majority can force the minority to bend to its will via government. And, yes, that's how government works. But it's not inherently just, and we created the Constitution to contain it - to prevent the majority from abusing minorities willy nilly.
That's a high hurdle.
Government should not be able to trod on the rights of some citizens for the benefit of others unless it's 100% agreed