No increased off site radioactive material detected.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Belief in a narrative of very questionable credibility is extremely convenient for Dotard. It's reminiscent of the bullshit WMD narrative pushed by Shrub to justify what became the Iraq debacle. Not that I think the US is going down a similar road in Iran. But the US military strike and the consequences from it will add to the destabilization of the region. But what does it matter to someone who so wanted to flex America's military might like a boy playing a video game.
It's never bothered the US and any other nation before. It seems to trigger the fragile though.
 
Who in the Arab world is upset that Iran’s nuclear weapons program is destroyied?
Any dembot voter that happens to be there, as well as Hamas, and other terrorist
 
It's never bothered the US and any other nation before. It seems to trigger the fragile though.
Were you alive during the Iraq disaster? Being bothered by thousands of US soldiers dying unnecessarily, wasting trillions of dollars, and destabilizing the ME for decades does not make one fragile. It makes one a functional human being.
 
Much has been said about the bombing in Iran. Talk of Iran being able to produce a nuclear bomb within the next few weeks certainly made it seem like the bombing was needed. However, if the makings of a bomb were in fact at those sites, there would be increased levels of nuclear material detected due to the explosion. No such increase has been detected. Seems we blew up 3 sites and started a war for no apparent reason.
View attachment 1127201


I'm far from an expert but I assume if there was nuclear material at the sites that were struck, and the bombs destroyed the facilities as Dotard claimed, nuclear material would be detectable. So..........was nuclear material there and or were the sites destroyed? We certainly can't trust trump on either matter.
 
Much has been said about the bombing in Iran. Talk of Iran being able to produce a nuclear bomb within the next few weeks certainly made it seem like the bombing was needed. However, if the makings of a bomb were in fact at those sites, there would be increased levels of nuclear material detected due to the explosion. No such increase has been detected. Seems we blew up 3 sites and started a war for no apparent reason.
View attachment 1127201
You were hoping for radiatiom not sealed underground??? WOW

Do you LOVE IRAN.
:ssex:
 
Were you alive during the Iraq disaster? Being bothered by thousands of US soldiers dying unnecessarily, wasting trillions of dollars, and destabilizing the ME for decades does not make one fragile. It makes one a functional human being.
Domestically Progs have more concern for illegals than citizens. And stir the pot on race. Many nations would take many decades to recover the destruction you did to communities over the last decade or two with the violence.
 
Much has been said about the bombing in Iran. Talk of Iran being able to produce a nuclear bomb within the next few weeks certainly made it seem like the bombing was needed. However, if the makings of a bomb were in fact at those sites, there would be increased levels of nuclear material detected due to the explosion. No such increase has been detected. Seems we blew up 3 sites and started a war for no apparent reason.
View attachment 1127201
So, Iran told you they didn’t work, huh? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 


I'm far from an expert but I assume if there was nuclear material at the sites that were struck, and the bombs destroyed the facilities as Dotard claimed, nuclear material would be detectable. So..........was nuclear material there and or were the sites destroyed? We certainly can't trust trump on either matter.

That’s great! Not only did we destroy their sites we also didn’t allow radiation to leak! Massively successful
 
That’s great! Not only did we destroy their sites we also didn’t allow radiation to leak! Massively successful
Hegseth is a genius!


(countdown to Dimwinger heads exploding….3…..2…….)
 
THREAD LOCKED - Violates thread start rules
When making a statement as fact, you need to provide a link to support the claim. An image is not a valid link.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom