Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
If anyone who knows cars is paying attention, sorry, but an electric car can beat the pants off of anything that is powered by gas.
Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Don't you mean RINO--------Not exactly the best and brightest are they?
Is the Boston Globe a good enough source of the idiotic pussy Moon Bats or are they in denial about the stupidty of their fellow Moon Bats?
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures - The Boston Globe
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.www.bostonglobe.com
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures
Governor Charlie Baker’s administration on Wednesday released a plan that will require the state to dramatically cut greenhouse-gas emissions in the next decade and beyond through a raft of changes, including by mandating that all new cars sold in the state be electric by 2035.
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
The state’s new legally binding commitment to reduce the state’s carbon emissions to 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is among the most ambitious of such pledges by governments in the United States and the rest of the world. Achieving that milestone would put the state on track to reach “net zero” fossil-fuel emissions by 2050, a goal announced this year by Baker’s administration.
“The people of Massachusetts are experiencing record droughts, increased risk of wildfire, severe weather, and flooding in our coastal communities,” Baker said in a news release. “The costly impacts of climate change are on display in the Commonwealth, making it critical that we take action.”
Evolution....of the automobile and energy industries. You can't stop it. That's the way things are headed by design. And this is a Republican governor.
LOL!Not exactly the best and brightest are they?
Is the Boston Globe a good enough source of the idiotic pussy Moon Bats or are they in denial about the stupidty of their fellow Moon Bats?
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures - The Boston Globe
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures
Governor Charlie Baker’s administration on Wednesday released a plan that will require the state to dramatically cut greenhouse-gas emissions in the next decade and beyond through a raft of changes, including by mandating that all new cars sold in the state be electric by 2035.
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
The state’s new legally binding commitment to reduce the state’s carbon emissions to 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is among the most ambitious of such pledges by governments in the United States and the rest of the world. Achieving that milestone would put the state on track to reach “net zero” fossil-fuel emissions by 2050, a goal announced this year by Baker’s administration.
“The people of Massachusetts are experiencing record droughts, increased risk of wildfire, severe weather, and flooding in our coastal communities,” Baker said in a news release. “The costly impacts of climate change are on display in the Commonwealth, making it critical that we take action.”
lolNot exactly the best and brightest are they?
Is the Boston Globe a good enough source of the idiotic pussy Moon Bats or are they in denial about the stupidty of their fellow Moon Bats?
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures - The Boston Globe
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures
Governor Charlie Baker’s administration on Wednesday released a plan that will require the state to dramatically cut greenhouse-gas emissions in the next decade and beyond through a raft of changes, including by mandating that all new cars sold in the state be electric by 2035.
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
The state’s new legally binding commitment to reduce the state’s carbon emissions to 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is among the most ambitious of such pledges by governments in the United States and the rest of the world. Achieving that milestone would put the state on track to reach “net zero” fossil-fuel emissions by 2050, a goal announced this year by Baker’s administration.
“The people of Massachusetts are experiencing record droughts, increased risk of wildfire, severe weather, and flooding in our coastal communities,” Baker said in a news release. “The costly impacts of climate change are on display in the Commonwealth, making it critical that we take action.”
people will just buy their new gas powered cars out of state while the MA new auto business dieslolNot exactly the best and brightest are they?
Is the Boston Globe a good enough source of the idiotic pussy Moon Bats or are they in denial about the stupidty of their fellow Moon Bats?
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures - The Boston Globe
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures
Governor Charlie Baker’s administration on Wednesday released a plan that will require the state to dramatically cut greenhouse-gas emissions in the next decade and beyond through a raft of changes, including by mandating that all new cars sold in the state be electric by 2035.
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
The state’s new legally binding commitment to reduce the state’s carbon emissions to 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is among the most ambitious of such pledges by governments in the United States and the rest of the world. Achieving that milestone would put the state on track to reach “net zero” fossil-fuel emissions by 2050, a goal announced this year by Baker’s administration.
“The people of Massachusetts are experiencing record droughts, increased risk of wildfire, severe weather, and flooding in our coastal communities,” Baker said in a news release. “The costly impacts of climate change are on display in the Commonwealth, making it critical that we take action.”
Embracing positive, beneficial change isn’t ‘communist.’
And there’s no ‘right’ to drive a gasoline-powered car.
Conservatives are as ignorant as they are ridiculous.
lolNot exactly the best and brightest are they?
Is the Boston Globe a good enough source of the idiotic pussy Moon Bats or are they in denial about the stupidty of their fellow Moon Bats?
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures - The Boston Globe
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures
Governor Charlie Baker’s administration on Wednesday released a plan that will require the state to dramatically cut greenhouse-gas emissions in the next decade and beyond through a raft of changes, including by mandating that all new cars sold in the state be electric by 2035.
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
The state’s new legally binding commitment to reduce the state’s carbon emissions to 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is among the most ambitious of such pledges by governments in the United States and the rest of the world. Achieving that milestone would put the state on track to reach “net zero” fossil-fuel emissions by 2050, a goal announced this year by Baker’s administration.
“The people of Massachusetts are experiencing record droughts, increased risk of wildfire, severe weather, and flooding in our coastal communities,” Baker said in a news release. “The costly impacts of climate change are on display in the Commonwealth, making it critical that we take action.”
Embracing positive, beneficial change isn’t ‘communist.’
And there’s no ‘right’ to drive a gasoline-powered car.
Conservatives are as ignorant as they are ridiculous.
Let's see one run the 12 Hours of Sebring, then.On a drag strip (or anywhere else that there is racing) electric cars can kick the crap out of gasoline engines.
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
lolNot exactly the best and brightest are they?
Is the Boston Globe a good enough source of the idiotic pussy Moon Bats or are they in denial about the stupidty of their fellow Moon Bats?
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures - The Boston Globe
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
Mass. to require all new cars sold to be electric by 2035 as part of climate-change measures
Governor Charlie Baker’s administration on Wednesday released a plan that will require the state to dramatically cut greenhouse-gas emissions in the next decade and beyond through a raft of changes, including by mandating that all new cars sold in the state be electric by 2035.
Among the changes the state plans over the next decade: retrofitting 1 million homes to use electricity for heating instead of gas and oil, cutting commuters’ driving miles by 15 percent, and dramatically increasing offshore wind power generation.
The state’s new legally binding commitment to reduce the state’s carbon emissions to 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is among the most ambitious of such pledges by governments in the United States and the rest of the world. Achieving that milestone would put the state on track to reach “net zero” fossil-fuel emissions by 2050, a goal announced this year by Baker’s administration.
“The people of Massachusetts are experiencing record droughts, increased risk of wildfire, severe weather, and flooding in our coastal communities,” Baker said in a news release. “The costly impacts of climate change are on display in the Commonwealth, making it critical that we take action.”
Embracing positive, beneficial change isn’t ‘communist.’
And there’s no ‘right’ to drive a gasoline-powered car.
Conservatives are as ignorant as they are ridiculous.
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Guess you don't know how electric cars work. No, you can't siphon off electricity like you do gasoline. And yeah, if a person needs a jump start, you use cables, not siphoning. Non sequitur, and you're dumb as a stump.
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Guess you don't know how electric cars work. No, you can't siphon off electricity like you do gasoline. And yeah, if a person needs a jump start, you use cables, not siphoning. Non sequitur, and you're dumb as a stump.
How do electric cars work? I don't think these Moon Bats know.
Lets see you plug it into an electric power plant and charge up the batteries and when the batteries get low (which they do quite often) you go plug it back into the power plant.
If these Moon Bats would ever take a course in Engineering they would learn that their ain't no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to conservation of energy.
When these Moon Bats do their little energy comparisons they never take into account the tremendous amount of energy it takes to manufacture the batteries or the environmental impact of disposal.
Then you have something else. It is called the fuel tax. Most of us pay for the roads when we buy a gallon of gas or diesel. However, electric cars don't pay for the roads but they use them. You know, like welfare queens. It won't take the filthy politicians long before they figure out that electric cars need to be taxed to make up for the lost fuel tax. Probably everybody's electric bill will shoot up.
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Guess you don't know how electric cars work. No, you can't siphon off electricity like you do gasoline. And yeah, if a person needs a jump start, you use cables, not siphoning. Non sequitur, and you're dumb as a stump.
How do electric cars work? I don't think these Moon Bats know.
Lets see you plug it into an electric power plant and charge up the batteries and when the batteries get low (which they do quite often) you go plug it back into the power plant.
If these Moon Bats would ever take a course in Engineering they would learn that their ain't no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to conservation of energy.
When these Moon Bats do their little energy comparisons they never take into account the tremendous amount of energy it takes to manufacture the batteries or the environmental impact of disposal.
Then you have something else. It is called the fuel tax. Most of us pay for the roads when we buy a gallon of gas or diesel. However, electric cars don't pay for the roads but they use them. You know, like welfare queens. It won't take the filthy politicians long before they figure out that electric cars need to be taxed to make up for the lost fuel tax. Probably everybody's electric bill will shoot up.
Really? You're going to compare electric vehicles to people on welfare? What do you think of those that ride bicycles as a means of transportation? Bikes don't pay road taxes, nor are they required to have a license plate or driver's permit. At least if you drive an electric car, you have to get a license to drive them.
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Guess you don't know how electric cars work. No, you can't siphon off electricity like you do gasoline. And yeah, if a person needs a jump start, you use cables, not siphoning. Non sequitur, and you're dumb as a stump.
How do electric cars work? I don't think these Moon Bats know.
Lets see you plug it into an electric power plant and charge up the batteries and when the batteries get low (which they do quite often) you go plug it back into the power plant.
If these Moon Bats would ever take a course in Engineering they would learn that their ain't no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to conservation of energy.
When these Moon Bats do their little energy comparisons they never take into account the tremendous amount of energy it takes to manufacture the batteries or the environmental impact of disposal.
Then you have something else. It is called the fuel tax. Most of us pay for the roads when we buy a gallon of gas or diesel. However, electric cars don't pay for the roads but they use them. You know, like welfare queens. It won't take the filthy politicians long before they figure out that electric cars need to be taxed to make up for the lost fuel tax. Probably everybody's electric bill will shoot up.
Really? You're going to compare electric vehicles to people on welfare? What do you think of those that ride bicycles as a means of transportation? Bikes don't pay road taxes, nor are they required to have a license plate or driver's permit. At least if you drive an electric car, you have to get a license to drive them.
If you drive around on roads and you don't pay the fuel tax then you are a welfare queen. You are using something that somebody else had to pay for. Despicable, isn't it?
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Guess you don't know how electric cars work. No, you can't siphon off electricity like you do gasoline. And yeah, if a person needs a jump start, you use cables, not siphoning. Non sequitur, and you're dumb as a stump.
How do electric cars work? I don't think these Moon Bats know.
Lets see you plug it into an electric power plant and charge up the batteries and when the batteries get low (which they do quite often) you go plug it back into the power plant.
If these Moon Bats would ever take a course in Engineering they would learn that their ain't no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to conservation of energy.
When these Moon Bats do their little energy comparisons they never take into account the tremendous amount of energy it takes to manufacture the batteries or the environmental impact of disposal.
Then you have something else. It is called the fuel tax. Most of us pay for the roads when we buy a gallon of gas or diesel. However, electric cars don't pay for the roads but they use them. You know, like welfare queens. It won't take the filthy politicians long before they figure out that electric cars need to be taxed to make up for the lost fuel tax. Probably everybody's electric bill will shoot up.
Really? You're going to compare electric vehicles to people on welfare? What do you think of those that ride bicycles as a means of transportation? Bikes don't pay road taxes, nor are they required to have a license plate or driver's permit. At least if you drive an electric car, you have to get a license to drive them.
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Guess you don't know how electric cars work. No, you can't siphon off electricity like you do gasoline. And yeah, if a person needs a jump start, you use cables, not siphoning. Non sequitur, and you're dumb as a stump.
How do electric cars work? I don't think these Moon Bats know.
Lets see you plug it into an electric power plant and charge up the batteries and when the batteries get low (which they do quite often) you go plug it back into the power plant.
If these Moon Bats would ever take a course in Engineering they would learn that their ain't no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to conservation of energy.
When these Moon Bats do their little energy comparisons they never take into account the tremendous amount of energy it takes to manufacture the batteries or the environmental impact of disposal.
Then you have something else. It is called the fuel tax. Most of us pay for the roads when we buy a gallon of gas or diesel. However, electric cars don't pay for the roads but they use them. You know, like welfare queens. It won't take the filthy politicians long before they figure out that electric cars need to be taxed to make up for the lost fuel tax. Probably everybody's electric bill will shoot up.
Really? You're going to compare electric vehicles to people on welfare? What do you think of those that ride bicycles as a means of transportation? Bikes don't pay road taxes, nor are they required to have a license plate or driver's permit. At least if you drive an electric car, you have to get a license to drive them.
If you drive around on roads and you don't pay the fuel tax then you are a welfare queen. You are using something that somebody else had to pay for. Despicable, isn't it?
Despicable (or deplorable) is what you are. Do you hate kids for riding bikes as well?
Yes. Imagine you swallow some gasoline when you transfer some from your car into your friends car. It may taste disgusting but you survive. Now try to swallow your battery acid.Costa Rica is a country that has already outlawed all gasoline cars. The liberal progressives don't know that waste battery acid is more harmful to the environment than waste gasoline products. They are just happy that they have reduced the driving range of all cars to keep them within cities so that nobody can escape the government.
You're full of shit. Sorry, but battery acid (as you say) yes, it is more harmful to the environment, but how much more do gasoline products produce? I only have to change the battery in my car about 1 times out of 10 years. So, my question is, does the battery over 10 years contribute more pollution than the car does in the same time?
Guess you don't know how electric cars work. No, you can't siphon off electricity like you do gasoline. And yeah, if a person needs a jump start, you use cables, not siphoning. Non sequitur, and you're dumb as a stump.
How do electric cars work? I don't think these Moon Bats know.
Lets see you plug it into an electric power plant and charge up the batteries and when the batteries get low (which they do quite often) you go plug it back into the power plant.
If these Moon Bats would ever take a course in Engineering they would learn that their ain't no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to conservation of energy.
When these Moon Bats do their little energy comparisons they never take into account the tremendous amount of energy it takes to manufacture the batteries or the environmental impact of disposal.
Then you have something else. It is called the fuel tax. Most of us pay for the roads when we buy a gallon of gas or diesel. However, electric cars don't pay for the roads but they use them. You know, like welfare queens. It won't take the filthy politicians long before they figure out that electric cars need to be taxed to make up for the lost fuel tax. Probably everybody's electric bill will shoot up.
Really? You're going to compare electric vehicles to people on welfare? What do you think of those that ride bicycles as a means of transportation? Bikes don't pay road taxes, nor are they required to have a license plate or driver's permit. At least if you drive an electric car, you have to get a license to drive them.
If you drive around on roads and you don't pay the fuel tax then you are a welfare queen. You are using something that somebody else had to pay for. Despicable, isn't it?
Despicable (or deplorable) is what you are. Do you hate kids for riding bikes as well?
We allow our children a free pass on that but any adult is milking the system. Adult bikers that use roads but don't pay for them are just as much a filthy ass welfare queen as an idiot that buys an electric car and uses the roads but don't pay for them.
When the Communist States like Kalifornia and Mass mandate their stupid electric cars then they are going to find out what happen to that source of revenue. Of course being filthy Liberals they will expect the federal government to pick up the tab. In other words have other people pay their bills. Welfare queens.
