NO EXIT? How will the U S be able to extricate itself from Trump's "little excursion"?

[luiza]

Face up to it .

Trumpfy brought you Project Epic Blunder and it is so huge that he cannot cover it up .

They will not stop laughing at this preening pea- cock for many years to come .

 

[struth]

What has Trump articulated regarding his "endgame" and its schedule for his "little excursion" into the Middle East?

Been pretty clear

He’s quoted here

Operation Epic Fury: Decisive American Power to Crush Iran’s Terror Regime

Under President Donald J. Trump’s unwavering leadership, the U.S. Armed Forces are executing Operation Epic Fury with overwhelming power, lethal

www.whitehouse.gov

 

[Zincwarrior]

Trump will declare victory and revert to the status quo ante, which is to say, no more attacks except in retaliation for things that Iran or its proxies do. How Bibi will proceed is questionable. He is absolutely committed to regime change.

Bank on it.

Except what if Iran keeps the Straits closed?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

What has Trump articulated regarding his "endgame" and its schedule for his "little excursion" into the Middle East?

unconditional surrender...and what does this have to with my post...europe is history

 

[Zincwarrior]

unconditional surrender...and what does this have to with my post...europe is history

Iran will keep the Straits closed. $200 a barrel. Gulf states starving. Good planning MAGAM

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Iran will keep the Straits closed. $200 a barrel. Gulf states starving. Good planning MAGAM

white liberal wet dream, who is "starving"...in any case europe is yesterdays news

 

[Zincwarrior]

white liberal wet dream, who is "starving"...in any case europe is yesterdays news

Dumbshit YOU MAGAS DID THIS.

 

[Rawley]

With its confused, contradictory pretexts and inevitable regional expansion, and despite its obscene cost, it has the prospect of yet another "forever war."

​

...That challenge is compounded by the prospect that tens of thousands of U.S. forces will need to remain in the Middle East for months or years after major combat operations end, tied down by postwar containment missions, reassurance operations for anxious Gulf partners, and requirements to engage in periodic re-strikes when Iran inevitably attempts to rebuild its military. That is exactly what happened in the aftermath of the 1991 Gulf War, which established a permanent U.S. basing presence in the Middle East to contain Saddam Hussein that persists to this day. Today, this is the quicksand that proponents of the war claim to be escaping by ending the Iranian threat once and for all. And yet Washington may once again be wading straight into it.​

​

As George H.W. Bush might put it, "Deep DooDoo Redux!"

Dude. we have 50,000 soldiers already stationed in the Middle East

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Dumbshit YOU MAGAS DID THIS.

I'm a democrat genius, vote democrat across the board especially judicial...and regardless of who did it, white liberals [not democrats genius] are getting what they want in failure

 

[Seymour Flops]

The thinly veiled rooting for the U.S. to lose is pretty disgusting. Also doomed to failure

Is this really what the media are telling you to do? To try and bring about defeat by predicting it?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Dude. we have 50,000 soldiers already stationed in the Middle East

If Iran us such a threat, where are the Gulf states? Why is Israel bombing Lebanon. We were scammed.

 

[Darkwind]

With its confused, contradictory pretexts and inevitable regional expansion, and despite its obscene cost, it has the prospect of yet another "forever war."

​

...That challenge is compounded by the prospect that tens of thousands of U.S. forces will need to remain in the Middle East for months or years after major combat operations end, tied down by postwar containment missions, reassurance operations for anxious Gulf partners, and requirements to engage in periodic re-strikes when Iran inevitably attempts to rebuild its military. That is exactly what happened in the aftermath of the 1991 Gulf War, which established a permanent U.S. basing presence in the Middle East to contain Saddam Hussein that persists to this day. Today, this is the quicksand that proponents of the war claim to be escaping by ending the Iranian threat once and for all. And yet Washington may once again be wading straight into it.​

​

As George H.W. Bush might put it, "Deep DooDoo Redux!"

Are you seeking intel to spread to our enemies?

The conditions on how this ends has been articulated to you, clearly, concisely, and then repeated.

We don't hold ourselves accountable for those things you fail to understand.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Face up to it .

Trumpfy brought you Project Epic Blunder and it is so huge that he cannot cover it up .

They will not stop laughing at this preening pea- cock for many years to come .

A true love Biden Gal ..
.

 

[Seymour Flops]

With its confused, contradictory pretexts and inevitable regional expansion, and despite its obscene cost, it has the prospect of yet another "forever war."

​

...That challenge is compounded by the prospect that tens of thousands of U.S. forces will need to remain in the Middle East for months or years after major combat operations end, tied down by postwar containment missions, reassurance operations for anxious Gulf partners, and requirements to engage in periodic re-strikes when Iran inevitably attempts to rebuild its military. That is exactly what happened in the aftermath of the 1991 Gulf War, which established a permanent U.S. basing presence in the Middle East to contain Saddam Hussein that persists to this day. Today, this is the quicksand that proponents of the war claim to be escaping by ending the Iranian threat once and for all. And yet Washington may once again be wading straight into it.​

​

As George H.W. Bush might put it, "Deep DooDoo Redux!"

Wrong question.

The real question is:

How will Iran be able to extricate itself from the U.S. attack?

Of course the answer depends on what you mean by "Iran."

If you mean the ruling Mullahs, they're dead, so the answer is "they won't."

If you mean the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, they will take longer to exterminate, but they probably will fight to the last lunatic.

If you mean the Iranian people, they are in a position similar to German concentration camp inmates watching the allies bomb the buildings. They are glad someone is doing something, and just hoping to survive the bombing to be liberated.

 

[toobfreak]

NO EXIT? How will the U S be able to extricate itself from Trump's "little excursion"?​

He's going to build a big golfing resort there and name it: "A Hole In Tehran."

 

[Zincwarrior]

Wrong question.

The real question is:

How will Iran be able to extricate itself from the U.S. attack?

Of course the answer depends on what you mean by "Iran."

If you mean the ruling Mullahs, they're dead, so the answer is "they won't."

If you mean the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, they will take longer to exterminate, but they probably will fight to the last lunatic.

If you mean the Iranian people, they are in a position similar to German concentration camp inmates watching the allies bomb the buildings. They are glad someone is doing something, and just hoping to survive the bombing to be liberated.

Straits are still closed. A billion a day. China is still getting oil. Russia can now sell oil.

Our allies aren't doing anything. Israel is busy bombing Lebanon. Netanyahoo and the Saudies hoodwinked us!

 

[schmidlap]

Are you seeking intel to spread to our enemies?

The conditions on how this ends has been articulated to you, clearly, concisely, and then repeated.

We don't hold ourselves accountable for those things you fail to understand.

I am not surprised that you are unable to identify a clear objective, an endgame, or a timetable.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Straits are still closed. A billion a day. China is still getting oil. Russia can now sell oil.

Our allies aren't doing anything. Israel is busy bombing Lebanon. Netanyahoo and the Saudies hoodwinked us!

How long are you predicting/hoping the straits will remain closed?

 

[Lumpy 1]

Straits are still closed. A billion a day. China is still getting oil. Russia can now sell oil.

Our allies aren't doing anything. Israel is busy bombing Lebanon. Netanyahoo and the Saudies hoodwinked us!

America has plenty of oil, maybe the Europeans should secure the Straits in their own self interest and perhaps you should look up patriotism.
.

 

[schmidlap]

Wrong question.

The real question is:

How will Iran be able to extricate itself from the U.S. attack?

Of course the answer depends on what you mean by "Iran."

If you mean the ruling Mullahs, they're dead, so the answer is "they won't."

If you mean the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, they will take longer to exterminate, but they probably will fight to the last lunatic.

If you mean the Iranian people, they are in a position similar to German concentration camp inmates watching the allies bomb the buildings. They are glad someone is doing something, and just hoping to survive the bombing to be liberated.

I expect that Trump's regime-change "little excursion" will be far lengthier and far more costly than some have been led to believe.