No deal brexit will cause recession

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2016
45,680
19,573
2,300
Y Cae Ras
UK cannot simply trade on WTO terms after no-deal Brexit, say experts

The UK will be unable to have frictionless, tariff-free trade under World Trade Organization rules for up to seven years in the event of a no-deal Brexit, according to two leading European Union law specialists.

The ensuing chaos could double food prices and plunge Britain into a recession that could last up to 30 years, claim the lawyers who acted for Gina Miller in the historic case that forced the government to seek parliament’s approval to leave the EU.

It has been claimed that the UK could simply move to WTO terms if there is no deal with the EU. But Anneli Howard, a specialist in EU and competition law at Monckton Chambers and a member of the bar’s Brexit working group, believes this isn’t true.

“No deal means leaving with nothing,” she said. “The anticipated recession will be worse than the 1930s, let alone 2008. It is impossible to say how long it would go on for. Some economists say 10 years, others say the effects could be felt for 20 or even 30 years: even ardent Brexiters agree it could be decades.”

We werent told about this either.
 
I don't care about them. They get. Oh, let some more muslims in.
 
Welcome back to the real world, Comrade!!!

Future UK trade deals with Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
A post-Brexit Britain will be looking to secure a range of trade deals outside of Europe.

Daily Politics reporter Emma Vardy looks at how easy it would be to trade with countries much further afield, such as Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.

How will UK trade with far away countries?

Greg
 
UK cannot simply trade on WTO terms after no-deal Brexit, say experts

The UK will be unable to have frictionless, tariff-free trade under World Trade Organization rules for up to seven years in the event of a no-deal Brexit, according to two leading European Union law specialists.

The ensuing chaos could double food prices and plunge Britain into a recession that could last up to 30 years, claim the lawyers who acted for Gina Miller in the historic case that forced the government to seek parliament’s approval to leave the EU.

It has been claimed that the UK could simply move to WTO terms if there is no deal with the EU. But Anneli Howard, a specialist in EU and competition law at Monckton Chambers and a member of the bar’s Brexit working group, believes this isn’t true.

“No deal means leaving with nothing,” she said. “The anticipated recession will be worse than the 1930s, let alone 2008. It is impossible to say how long it would go on for. Some economists say 10 years, others say the effects could be felt for 20 or even 30 years: even ardent Brexiters agree it could be decades.”

We werent told about this either.
It likely wouldn’t have mattered.

Bigots and racists don’t vote in accordance with logic, facts, and the truth.
 
Welcome back to the real world, Comrade!!!

Future UK trade deals with Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
A post-Brexit Britain will be looking to secure a range of trade deals outside of Europe.

Daily Politics reporter Emma Vardy looks at how easy it would be to trade with countries much further afield, such as Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.

How will UK trade with far away countries?

Greg
And none of this is actually ready to go. And these countries are pretty much insignificant anyway. Not one trade deal is ready to click into place on March 29th.
 
UK cannot simply trade on WTO terms after no-deal Brexit, say experts

The UK will be unable to have frictionless, tariff-free trade under World Trade Organization rules for up to seven years in the event of a no-deal Brexit, according to two leading European Union law specialists.

The ensuing chaos could double food prices and plunge Britain into a recession that could last up to 30 years, claim the lawyers who acted for Gina Miller in the historic case that forced the government to seek parliament’s approval to leave the EU.

It has been claimed that the UK could simply move to WTO terms if there is no deal with the EU. But Anneli Howard, a specialist in EU and competition law at Monckton Chambers and a member of the bar’s Brexit working group, believes this isn’t true.

“No deal means leaving with nothing,” she said. “The anticipated recession will be worse than the 1930s, let alone 2008. It is impossible to say how long it would go on for. Some economists say 10 years, others say the effects could be felt for 20 or even 30 years: even ardent Brexiters agree it could be decades.”

We werent told about this either.
It likely wouldn’t have mattered.

Bigots and racists don’t vote in accordance with logic, facts, and the truth.
Not all brexiters are racists or bigots,although all racists and bigots are brexiters. Remain should have hammered the shit out of this. Nobody knowingly votes to be poorer.
 
It is so ridiculous that the English started this mess, trying to get out of membership in the E.U. that they never fully joined, and have now worked themselves into a position where they are dependent on the E.U. to pull English bacon out of the fire. Parliament resembles a group of petulant children. No one could blame the E.U. if it were to simply refuse further talk about the affair, having already negotiated everything on England's terms up to this point. Predictably, the English now want more. They not only want their cake and to eat it, they want the oven and the kitchen.
The border problem was always there, a thoroughly English responsibility. Now, the E.U. is supposed to resolve it for England? Here's a solution; unify Ireland into one country; no more frontier with the E.U.!
 
It is so ridiculous that the English started this mess, trying to get out of membership in the E.U. that they never fully joined, and have now worked themselves into a position where they are dependent on the E.U. to pull English bacon out of the fire. Parliament resembles a group of petulant children. No one could blame the E.U. if it were to simply refuse further talk about the affair, having already negotiated everything on England's terms up to this point. Predictably, the English now want more. They not only want their cake and to eat it, they want the oven and the kitchen.
The border problem was always there, a thoroughly English responsibility. Now, the E.U. is supposed to resolve it for England? Here's a solution; unify Ireland into one country; no more frontier with the E.U.!
But why would the Republic want to take on the clusterfuck that is Ulster?

The Border was never mentioned during the referendum. It wasnt an issue.We have all been let down.
 
It is so ridiculous that the English started this mess, trying to get out of membership in the E.U. that they never fully joined, and have now worked themselves into a position where they are dependent on the E.U. to pull English bacon out of the fire. Parliament resembles a group of petulant children. No one could blame the E.U. if it were to simply refuse further talk about the affair, having already negotiated everything on England's terms up to this point. Predictably, the English now want more. They not only want their cake and to eat it, they want the oven and the kitchen.
The border problem was always there, a thoroughly English responsibility. Now, the E.U. is supposed to resolve it for England? Here's a solution; unify Ireland into one country; no more frontier with the E.U.!
But why would the Republic want to take on the clusterfuck that is Ulster?

The Border was never mentioned during the referendum. It wasnt an issue.We have all been let down.
Of course, the suggestion was somewhat 'tongue-in-cheek'. There is no possibility of Irish unification at this time. War, maybe, but not unification.
England has done an admirable job of 'phuquing' itself and the E.U. That is an amazing feat. What possible interest would the E.U. have in saving May's 'posterior'?
 
It is so ridiculous that the English started this mess, trying to get out of membership in the E.U. that they never fully joined, and have now worked themselves into a position where they are dependent on the E.U. to pull English bacon out of the fire. Parliament resembles a group of petulant children. No one could blame the E.U. if it were to simply refuse further talk about the affair, having already negotiated everything on England's terms up to this point. Predictably, the English now want more. They not only want their cake and to eat it, they want the oven and the kitchen.
The border problem was always there, a thoroughly English responsibility. Now, the E.U. is supposed to resolve it for England? Here's a solution; unify Ireland into one country; no more frontier with the E.U.!
But why would the Republic want to take on the clusterfuck that is Ulster?

The Border was never mentioned during the referendum. It wasnt an issue.We have all been let down.
Of course, the suggestion was somewhat 'tongue-in-cheek'. There is no possibility of Irish unification at this time. War, maybe, but not unification.
England has done an admirable job of 'phuquing' itself and the E.U. That is an amazing feat. What possible interest would the E.U. have in saving May's 'posterior'?
Well they will obviously prefer us in, but not at any cost. I think her plan this time is to speak to them in a louder voice.That always works with foreigners.
 
It is so ridiculous that the English started this mess, trying to get out of membership in the E.U. that they never fully joined, and have now worked themselves into a position where they are dependent on the E.U. to pull English bacon out of the fire. Parliament resembles a group of petulant children. No one could blame the E.U. if it were to simply refuse further talk about the affair, having already negotiated everything on England's terms up to this point. Predictably, the English now want more. They not only want their cake and to eat it, they want the oven and the kitchen.
The border problem was always there, a thoroughly English responsibility. Now, the E.U. is supposed to resolve it for England? Here's a solution; unify Ireland into one country; no more frontier with the E.U.!
But why would the Republic want to take on the clusterfuck that is Ulster?

The Border was never mentioned during the referendum. It wasnt an issue.We have all been let down.
Of course, the suggestion was somewhat 'tongue-in-cheek'. There is no possibility of Irish unification at this time. War, maybe, but not unification.
England has done an admirable job of 'phuquing' itself and the E.U. That is an amazing feat. What possible interest would the E.U. have in saving May's 'posterior'?
Well they will obviously prefer us in, but not at any cost. I think her plan this time is to speak to them in a louder voice.That always works with foreigners.
Yes, when not understood in English, repeat more loudly and slowly. Surely, everyone must understand!
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top