Neither Madeline or any of the others "remove them from the country" crowd offer anything of worth here.
Why? Because they don't have the votes or the political power or the methodology to enforce such a thing.
Of course the U.S. can absorb the illegals. Why? Because, I state quietly, they are here, they are working, and I want to turn them into solid taxpayers.
Chanel has offered the only reasonably workable solution.
Why is deporting them not feasible? And do you just close your eyes to what Amnesty will do to the US?
Because we are not going to become an police state, Mad, and you have no idea what Amnesty will do, either.
Offer solutions that fit into a feasible reality, guys. I don't want to argue but I do despise stubborness that becomes immoral because you ignore what is real and what is not.
I think you are the last person that should be lecturing on morality Jake. We know what amnesty will do because it has been done before. If you don't want to do your job, quit. It's that simple. You just keep trying to sell that kool-aid.
Do you advocate ignoring all international borders around the world. Do you advocate Americans owning property in Mexico. Hey, let's bring that to the UN!!!!! We don't need no stinking Passports to go where we want, right!!!!! It's troublesome and unrealistic, right????? Income Tax is an unnecessary burden too, right????? Is that what you advocate. Hey, I want to get paid for not doing my job too!!!!! It's too humid, the sun got in my eyes, I have a head ache, somebody spit on me. Why not go legit and exchange that paycheck for an unemployment check, at least you won't by conspiring against the Constitution.
How about we all get to pick which laws we don't want to apply to us in our jobs, say one from column A and 2 from Column B. See I'm thinking like a Federal Employee already. Breaks over, let's say we stop for lunch.