Newt Gingrich vs New Gingrich

[ClosedCaption]

Newt says that the POTUS just can't commit obstruction because the POUTS can fire anyone he wants which of course is a separate issue.

But Newt back in the Clinton days said the exact opposite that the POTUS was obstructing.

Maybe they should debate each other.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Newt says that the POTUS just can't commit obstruction because the POUTS can fire anyone he wants which of course is a separate issue.

But Newt back in the Clinton days said the exact opposite that the POTUS was obstructing.

Did he?

Please detail.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Newt says that the POTUS just can't commit obstruction because the POUTS can fire anyone he wants which of course is a separate issue.

But Newt back in the Clinton days said the exact opposite that the POTUS was obstructing.

Did he?

Please detail.

"What you have lived through for 2.5 long years is the most systematic, deliberate obstruction-of-justice, cover-up, and effort to avoid the truth we have ever seen in American history," Gingrich said in 1998. "The American people have the right to expect that the rule of law will prevail, that no one is above the law," Gingrich said on the House floor the same year. Times sure have changed.

That's just one article but pick any link, story etc you like. It won't change

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Newt says that the POTUS just can't commit obstruction because the POUTS can fire anyone he wants which of course is a separate issue.

But Newt back in the Clinton days said the exact opposite that the POTUS was obstructing.

Did he?

Please detail.

"What you have lived through for 2.5 long years is the most systematic, deliberate obstruction-of-justice, cover-up, and effort to avoid the truth we have ever seen in American history," Gingrich said in 1998. "The American people have the right to expect that the rule of law will prevail, that no one is above the law," Gingrich said on the House floor the same year. Times sure have changed.

That's just one article but pick any link, story etc you like. It won't change

You're so wonderful.

Now, detail the relationship between that circumstance and the current one.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Newt says that the POTUS just can't commit obstruction because the POUTS can fire anyone he wants which of course is a separate issue.

But Newt back in the Clinton days said the exact opposite that the POTUS was obstructing.

Did he?

Please detail.

"What you have lived through for 2.5 long years is the most systematic, deliberate obstruction-of-justice, cover-up, and effort to avoid the truth we have ever seen in American history," Gingrich said in 1998. "The American people have the right to expect that the rule of law will prevail, that no one is above the law," Gingrich said on the House floor the same year. Times sure have changed.

That's just one article but pick any link, story etc you like. It won't change

You're so wonderful.

Now, detail the relationship between that circumstance and the current one.

If you can't then an explanation is a waste of time.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Newt says that the POTUS just can't commit obstruction because the POUTS can fire anyone he wants which of course is a separate issue.

But Newt back in the Clinton days said the exact opposite that the POTUS was obstructing.

Did he?

Please detail.

"What you have lived through for 2.5 long years is the most systematic, deliberate obstruction-of-justice, cover-up, and effort to avoid the truth we have ever seen in American history," Gingrich said in 1998. "The American people have the right to expect that the rule of law will prevail, that no one is above the law," Gingrich said on the House floor the same year. Times sure have changed.

That's just one article but pick any link, story etc you like. It won't change

You're so wonderful.

Now, detail the relationship between that circumstance and the current one.

If you can't then an explanation is a waste of time.

That was a legitimate question..



.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Newt says that the POTUS just can't commit obstruction because the POUTS can fire anyone he wants which of course is a separate issue.

But Newt back in the Clinton days said the exact opposite that the POTUS was obstructing.

Did he?

Please detail.

"What you have lived through for 2.5 long years is the most systematic, deliberate obstruction-of-justice, cover-up, and effort to avoid the truth we have ever seen in American history," Gingrich said in 1998. "The American people have the right to expect that the rule of law will prevail, that no one is above the law," Gingrich said on the House floor the same year. Times sure have changed.

That's just one article but pick any link, story etc you like. It won't change

You're so wonderful.

Now, detail the relationship between that circumstance and the current one.

If you can't then an explanation is a waste of time.

It's more likely any fantastical explanation of yours would be a waste of time.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Gee golly wow a politician demonstrates partisanship

never saw that before

 

[ClosedCaption]

Newt says that the POTUS just can't commit obstruction because the POUTS can fire anyone he wants which of course is a separate issue.

But Newt back in the Clinton days said the exact opposite that the POTUS was obstructing.

Did he?

Please detail.

"What you have lived through for 2.5 long years is the most systematic, deliberate obstruction-of-justice, cover-up, and effort to avoid the truth we have ever seen in American history," Gingrich said in 1998. "The American people have the right to expect that the rule of law will prevail, that no one is above the law," Gingrich said on the House floor the same year. Times sure have changed.

That's just one article but pick any link, story etc you like. It won't change

You're so wonderful.

Now, detail the relationship between that circumstance and the current one.

If you can't then an explanation is a waste of time.

That was a legitimate question..



.

Ok.