Newt Gingrich voicing concerns over the dangers of atheism!!

[joaquinmiller]

Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people.



Language: A Key Mechanism of Control


Newt Gingrich's 1996 GOPAC memo

As you know, one of the key points in the GOPAC tapes is that "language matters." In the video "We are a Majority," Language is listed as a key mechanism of control used by a majority party, along with Agenda, Rules, Attitude and Learning. As the tapes have been used in training sessions across the country and mailed to candidates we have heard a plaintive plea: "I wish I could speak like Newt."

That takes years of practice. But, we believe that you could have a significant impact on your campaign and the way you communicate if we help a little. That is why we have created this list of words and phrases.

Check it out.

Language: A Key Mechanism of Control

Race baiting post. Newt has no history of racist rhetoric. Show it. Go ahead.

You're quite right, he has no history of racist rhetoric. He chooses his words with care. That was sort of the point of the post.

What do a brown Kenyan, colonialist President, a brown child army at the border, a black African Ebola-bearing terrorist, and a brown Middle-Eastern Islamist have in common?

 

[sealybobo]

That is certainly not why we hate you.

At least you admit your hate. That's the first step to healing. Poor thing.

That's right sparky. I do admit it. You guys are to cowardly and dishonest to. There are things and people who are deserving of hate This might interest you.

Far-Right Legal Orgs Object to 'Hate Group' Label, But It Fits

Those on the extreme right love to accuse the liberals and progressive of being hateful and intolerant but they are either willfully lying, or in denial, projecting their own hatred, and not in touch with reality.


They can say that we are hateful, bigoted, or intolerant all they wish. But let me sum up the difference between them and us. We do indeed have a problem with people who are hateful towards others simply because they do not approve of them or do not understand them. We are not tolerant of people who are on a mission to make life miserable for others in the name of ideology. We are not tolerant of the selfish and greedy who kick those who are less fortunate and struggling to get by to the curb, so that they and their donors can have even more. We have a problem- and you can call it hateful if you wish- with people who arbitrarily and capriciously chose to marginalize, demean and deprive others of the rights that they take for granted.

We have a problem with people who discriminate and incite violence against others who they do not like, do not understand, or are threatened by them in some vague way. The same goes for vilify the poor, immigrants and with those of other ethnic groups and religions.

In summary, the rights intolerance is driven by hate, greed and ideology . All intolerance is not equal.

Anyone who has hatred and intolerance directed at them- whether it be subtle or overt, verbal or physical, in private or in the public/ political arena has the right to respond proportionately. If that response is portrayed or characterized as hatred so be it. But, know this all hatred and intolerance is not equal. Consider the following:

https://www.advocate.com/politics/2017/7/17/far-right-legal-orgs-object-hate-group-label-it-fits

Officials with the Alliance Defending Freedom and Liberty Counsel say their organizations aren’t anti-LGBT “hate groups,” as labeled by the Southern Poverty Law Center — but the SPLC says the designation definitely fits.

Both are right-wing legal organizations that represent mostly fundamentalist Christian clients, including many who are anti-LGBT and/or anti-abortion. ADF, which last week hosted a closed-door speech by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, objected to ABC News calling it a hate group in coverage of the matter. It has asked ABC to apologize.

The SPLC, however, says the shoe fits in both cases.

Regarding ADF, SPLC president Richard Cohen released this statement: "The Alliance Defending Freedom spreads demonizing lies about the LGBT community in this country and seeks to criminalize it abroad. If the ADF had its way, gay people would be back in the closet for fear of going to jail. It was inappropriate for Attorney General Sessions to lend his credibility to the group by appearing before it, and it was ironic that he would suggest that the rights of ADF sympathizers are under attack when the ADF is doing everything in its power to deny the equal protection of the laws to the LGBT community."

On Liberty Counsel, Cohen said, "We stand ready to support our designation of Liberty Counsel as a hate group. Liberty Counsel is a group that has consistently called LGBT people 'immoral, unnatural and self-destructive.' It has a track record of attempting to criminalize homosexual conduct and to legalize discrimination against the LGBT community. There is nothing 'pro-family' about dehumanizing LGBT people. This lawsuit and other recent attacks against GuideStar are simply attempts to distract the public from Liberty Counsel’s hateful agenda."

One gigantic strawman. It isn't "hate" simply because conservatives disagree with you on the function of government. You enjoy that strawman so you can jusyify your self-righteous indignation over not being able to turn the Federal Government into a welfare office to buy votes.

You need to learn the definition of what a straw man argument is. I did not assign an argument to you that you did not make and then shoot it down. THAT is a straw man. You guys like to bleat and blather about straw man arguments whenever you don't know what else to say.

The fact is that I did not really put forth an argument so much as a philosophy on hate. YOU are using a straw man by accusing me of wanting turn the Federal Government into a welfare office to buy votes when I never said anything of the kind. Is it possible that you are so intellectually limited that you can't see that?

You have said you want to turn the Federal Government into a welfare office by the policies you propose. You want the Federal Government to take care of people with the taxes of workers, and if we don't go along with you we're all hateful, bigotted, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist poopy pants.

So no safety nets paid for by citizens taxes?

 

[BS Filter]

Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people.



Language: A Key Mechanism of Control


Newt Gingrich's 1996 GOPAC memo

As you know, one of the key points in the GOPAC tapes is that "language matters." In the video "We are a Majority," Language is listed as a key mechanism of control used by a majority party, along with Agenda, Rules, Attitude and Learning. As the tapes have been used in training sessions across the country and mailed to candidates we have heard a plaintive plea: "I wish I could speak like Newt."

That takes years of practice. But, we believe that you could have a significant impact on your campaign and the way you communicate if we help a little. That is why we have created this list of words and phrases.

Check it out.

Language: A Key Mechanism of Control

Race baiting post. Newt has no history of racist rhetoric. Show it. Go ahead.

You're quite right, he has no history of racist rhetoric. He chooses his words with care. That was sort of the point of the post.

What do a brown Kenyan, colonialist President, a brown child army at the border, a black African Ebola-bearing terrorist, and a brown Middle-Eastern Islamist have in common?

So Newt isn't a racist as was the claim.

 

[BS Filter]

At least you admit your hate. That's the first step to healing. Poor thing.

That's right sparky. I do admit it. You guys are to cowardly and dishonest to. There are things and people who are deserving of hate This might interest you.

Far-Right Legal Orgs Object to 'Hate Group' Label, But It Fits

Those on the extreme right love to accuse the liberals and progressive of being hateful and intolerant but they are either willfully lying, or in denial, projecting their own hatred, and not in touch with reality.


They can say that we are hateful, bigoted, or intolerant all they wish. But let me sum up the difference between them and us. We do indeed have a problem with people who are hateful towards others simply because they do not approve of them or do not understand them. We are not tolerant of people who are on a mission to make life miserable for others in the name of ideology. We are not tolerant of the selfish and greedy who kick those who are less fortunate and struggling to get by to the curb, so that they and their donors can have even more. We have a problem- and you can call it hateful if you wish- with people who arbitrarily and capriciously chose to marginalize, demean and deprive others of the rights that they take for granted.

We have a problem with people who discriminate and incite violence against others who they do not like, do not understand, or are threatened by them in some vague way. The same goes for vilify the poor, immigrants and with those of other ethnic groups and religions.

In summary, the rights intolerance is driven by hate, greed and ideology . All intolerance is not equal.

Anyone who has hatred and intolerance directed at them- whether it be subtle or overt, verbal or physical, in private or in the public/ political arena has the right to respond proportionately. If that response is portrayed or characterized as hatred so be it. But, know this all hatred and intolerance is not equal. Consider the following:

https://www.advocate.com/politics/2017/7/17/far-right-legal-orgs-object-hate-group-label-it-fits

Officials with the Alliance Defending Freedom and Liberty Counsel say their organizations aren’t anti-LGBT “hate groups,” as labeled by the Southern Poverty Law Center — but the SPLC says the designation definitely fits.

Both are right-wing legal organizations that represent mostly fundamentalist Christian clients, including many who are anti-LGBT and/or anti-abortion. ADF, which last week hosted a closed-door speech by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, objected to ABC News calling it a hate group in coverage of the matter. It has asked ABC to apologize.

The SPLC, however, says the shoe fits in both cases.

Regarding ADF, SPLC president Richard Cohen released this statement: "The Alliance Defending Freedom spreads demonizing lies about the LGBT community in this country and seeks to criminalize it abroad. If the ADF had its way, gay people would be back in the closet for fear of going to jail. It was inappropriate for Attorney General Sessions to lend his credibility to the group by appearing before it, and it was ironic that he would suggest that the rights of ADF sympathizers are under attack when the ADF is doing everything in its power to deny the equal protection of the laws to the LGBT community."

On Liberty Counsel, Cohen said, "We stand ready to support our designation of Liberty Counsel as a hate group. Liberty Counsel is a group that has consistently called LGBT people 'immoral, unnatural and self-destructive.' It has a track record of attempting to criminalize homosexual conduct and to legalize discrimination against the LGBT community. There is nothing 'pro-family' about dehumanizing LGBT people. This lawsuit and other recent attacks against GuideStar are simply attempts to distract the public from Liberty Counsel’s hateful agenda."

One gigantic strawman. It isn't "hate" simply because conservatives disagree with you on the function of government. You enjoy that strawman so you can jusyify your self-righteous indignation over not being able to turn the Federal Government into a welfare office to buy votes.

You need to learn the definition of what a straw man argument is. I did not assign an argument to you that you did not make and then shoot it down. THAT is a straw man. You guys like to bleat and blather about straw man arguments whenever you don't know what else to say.

The fact is that I did not really put forth an argument so much as a philosophy on hate. YOU are using a straw man by accusing me of wanting turn the Federal Government into a welfare office to buy votes when I never said anything of the kind. Is it possible that you are so intellectually limited that you can't see that?

You have said you want to turn the Federal Government into a welfare office by the policies you propose. You want the Federal Government to take care of people with the taxes of workers, and if we don't go along with you we're all hateful, bigotted, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist poopy pants.

So no safety nets paid for by citizens taxes?

We have emergency programs. You know what I meant.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people.



Language: A Key Mechanism of Control


Newt Gingrich's 1996 GOPAC memo

As you know, one of the key points in the GOPAC tapes is that "language matters." In the video "We are a Majority," Language is listed as a key mechanism of control used by a majority party, along with Agenda, Rules, Attitude and Learning. As the tapes have been used in training sessions across the country and mailed to candidates we have heard a plaintive plea: "I wish I could speak like Newt."

That takes years of practice. But, we believe that you could have a significant impact on your campaign and the way you communicate if we help a little. That is why we have created this list of words and phrases.

Check it out.

Language: A Key Mechanism of Control

Race baiting post. Newt has no history of racist rhetoric. Show it. Go ahead.

You're quite right, he has no history of racist rhetoric. He chooses his words with care. That was sort of the point of the post.

What do a brown Kenyan, colonialist President, a brown child army at the border, a black African Ebola-bearing terrorist, and a brown Middle-Eastern Islamist have in common?

So Newt isn't a racist as was the claim.

The claim was this:

"Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people."

What did you expect? Lot's of n-word quotes? One doesn't have to use racist language to play on racial sensibilities or feelings. Not even David Duke goes around spouting the n-word.

 

[ding]

The history of the 20th century says he is correct.

If it is a fact, does it matter that Christianity is threatened equally or more by one threat than another? If so, why?

We live in a predominantly Christian nation. Militant atheists aren't attacking any other religion here. Throughout history socialism has always attempted to subordinate the dominant religion. Even when it was one religion against another.

It matters because we can only be destroyed from within and that is the path we are on.

The founding fathers believed that morality and virtue and religion were the foundation of liberty and freedom for good reason.

 

[joaquinmiller]

I hope Newtie told those students at Ave Maria Law School, one of the lowest-ranked law schools in America (56.9% of its graduates pass the Bar Exam), that their duty as Officers of the Court is to accord Buddhism, Islam, and Pantheistic Quackeries exactly the same legal respect they extend to Christianity.

 

[ding]

“The rise of a secular, atheist philosophy” in the West is "an equally or even more dangerous threat” to Christianity than terrorist organizations that will kill Christians if “they don’t submit,” Gingrich said.

https://www.naplesnews.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/18/newt-gingrich-tells-collier-audience-secular-atheist-philosophy-threat-christianity/340882002/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


While still married to his second wife, he began an affair with his aide (20 years younger) in 93 while still married but got divorced in 2000 and he has the nerve to talk about Clinton. He was minority whip and speaker of the House through from 1995-1999.

How ironic. He is a staple on the Hannity show. Its a good thing that aide married him in a civil ceremony, and then later in a Catholic ceremony in 2009 (must of cost him dearly for an annulment) before he ran for Potus in 2012.

One could say he was saved by Callista, who by the way carried on a 9 year affair with a married man.

For those too young to really know who Newt Gingrich is, you will see him a lot on Hannity.

So your argument is that because he is not perfect or has not done perfect things, he can't be possibly correct that atheism is a threat to Christianity?

Not perfect, he is scum in my book, his views on everything, his lust for money, and power. His cheating. Just because the man says he found Jesus at the age of 60 or so, I really find him a despicable person and he should not be talking about atheist.

I believe you are selective in your biases.

 

[ding]

Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people.



Language: A Key Mechanism of Control


Newt Gingrich's 1996 GOPAC memo

As you know, one of the key points in the GOPAC tapes is that "language matters." In the video "We are a Majority," Language is listed as a key mechanism of control used by a majority party, along with Agenda, Rules, Attitude and Learning. As the tapes have been used in training sessions across the country and mailed to candidates we have heard a plaintive plea: "I wish I could speak like Newt."

That takes years of practice. But, we believe that you could have a significant impact on your campaign and the way you communicate if we help a little. That is why we have created this list of words and phrases.

Check it out.

Language: A Key Mechanism of Control

Race baiting post. Newt has no history of racist rhetoric. Show it. Go ahead.

You're quite right, he has no history of racist rhetoric. He chooses his words with care. That was sort of the point of the post.

What do a brown Kenyan, colonialist President, a brown child army at the border, a black African Ebola-bearing terrorist, and a brown Middle-Eastern Islamist have in common?

So Newt isn't a racist as was the claim.

The claim was this:

"Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people."

What did you expect? Lot's of n-word quotes? One doesn't have to use racist language to play on racial sensibilities or feelings. Not even David Duke goes around spouting the n-word.

And yet, what he is saying is true. The founding fathers would agree with him.

 

[ding]

I hope Newtie told those students at Ave Maria Law School, one of the lowest-ranked law schools in America (56.9% of its graduates pass the Bar Exam), that their duty as Officers of the Court is to accord Buddhism, Islam, and Pantheistic Quackeries exactly the same legal respect they extend to Christianity.

Why wouldn't he?

 

[joaquinmiller]

Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people.



Language: A Key Mechanism of Control


Newt Gingrich's 1996 GOPAC memo

As you know, one of the key points in the GOPAC tapes is that "language matters." In the video "We are a Majority," Language is listed as a key mechanism of control used by a majority party, along with Agenda, Rules, Attitude and Learning. As the tapes have been used in training sessions across the country and mailed to candidates we have heard a plaintive plea: "I wish I could speak like Newt."

That takes years of practice. But, we believe that you could have a significant impact on your campaign and the way you communicate if we help a little. That is why we have created this list of words and phrases.

Check it out.

Language: A Key Mechanism of Control

Race baiting post. Newt has no history of racist rhetoric. Show it. Go ahead.

You're quite right, he has no history of racist rhetoric. He chooses his words with care. That was sort of the point of the post.

What do a brown Kenyan, colonialist President, a brown child army at the border, a black African Ebola-bearing terrorist, and a brown Middle-Eastern Islamist have in common?

So Newt isn't a racist as was the claim.

The claim was this:

"Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people."

What did you expect? Lot's of n-word quotes? One doesn't have to use racist language to play on racial sensibilities or feelings. Not even David Duke goes around spouting the n-word.

And yet, what he is saying is true. The founding fathers would agree with him.

They'd laugh and give him the hook for pandering.

 

[ding]

Race baiting post. Newt has no history of racist rhetoric. Show it. Go ahead.

You're quite right, he has no history of racist rhetoric. He chooses his words with care. That was sort of the point of the post.

What do a brown Kenyan, colonialist President, a brown child army at the border, a black African Ebola-bearing terrorist, and a brown Middle-Eastern Islamist have in common?

So Newt isn't a racist as was the claim.

The claim was this:

"Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people."

What did you expect? Lot's of n-word quotes? One doesn't have to use racist language to play on racial sensibilities or feelings. Not even David Duke goes around spouting the n-word.

And yet, what he is saying is true. The founding fathers would agree with him.

They'd laugh and give him the hook for pandering.

Because people of one faith can't possibly respect a people of another faith?

 

[joaquinmiller]

I hope Newtie told those students at Ave Maria Law School, one of the lowest-ranked law schools in America (56.9% of its graduates pass the Bar Exam), that their duty as Officers of the Court is to accord Buddhism, Islam, and Pantheistic Quackeries exactly the same legal respect they extend to Christianity.

Why wouldn't he?

Why didn't he? He singled out Christianity. Is it threatened more by atheism than other Deistic religions?

 

[ding]

I hope Newtie told those students at Ave Maria Law School, one of the lowest-ranked law schools in America (56.9% of its graduates pass the Bar Exam), that their duty as Officers of the Court is to accord Buddhism, Islam, and Pantheistic Quackeries exactly the same legal respect they extend to Christianity.

Why wouldn't he?

Why didn't he? He singled out Christianity. Is it threatened more by atheism than other Deistic religions?

That's because we live in a predominantly Christian nation. Militant atheists aren't attacking those religions here.

Throughout history socialism has always attempted to subordinate the dominant religion. Even when it was one religion against another.

 

[edthecynic]

“The rise of a secular, atheist philosophy” in the West is "an equally or even more dangerous threat” to Christianity than terrorist organizations that will kill Christians if “they don’t submit,” Gingrich said

Not one man in a thousand has either strength of mind or goodness of heart to be an Atheist.

-- Samuel Taylor Coleridge

 

[joaquinmiller]

Militant atheism. Jesus H.

 

[edthecynic]

While still married to his second wife, he began an affair with his aide (20 years younger) in 93 while still married but got divorced in 2000 and he has the nerve to talk about Clinton. He was minority whip and speaker of the House through from 1995-1999.

My favorite was his rationalization for cheating on his wife. His "passion for this country."

“There's no question at times of my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate,”
- Snooty Newtie Gringrich

 

[edthecynic]

I will take the moral values of an atheist over that of Newt Gingrich any day

Stalin? Mao? I mean, we're comparing national leaders after all.

And Hitler was a Christian

For political purposes only. He had Julius Streicher working on replacing Jesus with himself within the church.

Just like Tramp and every other CON$ervoFascist.

 

[BS Filter]

Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people.



Language: A Key Mechanism of Control


Newt Gingrich's 1996 GOPAC memo

As you know, one of the key points in the GOPAC tapes is that "language matters." In the video "We are a Majority," Language is listed as a key mechanism of control used by a majority party, along with Agenda, Rules, Attitude and Learning. As the tapes have been used in training sessions across the country and mailed to candidates we have heard a plaintive plea: "I wish I could speak like Newt."

That takes years of practice. But, we believe that you could have a significant impact on your campaign and the way you communicate if we help a little. That is why we have created this list of words and phrases.

Check it out.

Language: A Key Mechanism of Control

Race baiting post. Newt has no history of racist rhetoric. Show it. Go ahead.

You're quite right, he has no history of racist rhetoric. He chooses his words with care. That was sort of the point of the post.

What do a brown Kenyan, colonialist President, a brown child army at the border, a black African Ebola-bearing terrorist, and a brown Middle-Eastern Islamist have in common?

So Newt isn't a racist as was the claim.

The claim was this:

"Nothing Gingrich says should be taken at face value. He doesn't give a damn about Christians or Christianity. His interest is in stoking division and inflaming hatred - usually aimed at brown people."

What did you expect? Lot's of n-word quotes? One doesn't have to use racist language to play on racial sensibilities or feelings. Not even David Duke goes around spouting the n-word.

Then show me something Newt said as an example of his racist rhetoric. Still waiting.

 

[cnm]

Naw, I'm playing with you like a cat with a mouse. Now I'm bored. Later.

How is YHWH not playing with Newt? YHWH is omniscient and omnipotent. It's jerking Newt's chain.