Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel

[Shusha]

Tlaib Blames Israel for Muslim Honor Killings

The Baby-fist article is actually a good which, for the most part, correctly identifies the underlying causes of femicide.

That said, its ridiculous to include Israel and the "occupation" in the discussion of femicide, as the author correctly points out: it happens everywhere in the world, in all countries. Its pretty hypocritical of her to claim it happens everywhere so we can't pin the blame on Arabs or Muslims, while simultaneously saying its the fault of the occupation.

 

[P F Tinmore]

So, was Israel wrong in denying Omar and Tlaib entry to their country? According to Professor Eugene Kontorovich of the George Mason University School of Law ….. “As someone one who has argued that Israel should admit Omar and Tlaib, I must also say that the decision to bar them is legitimate. Countries routinely deny visas to those with extremist views. The U.S. excludes people for ideologies fundamentally hostile to the U.S. ” and, in that regard, Israeli law also provides that, “Israel has a right to prohibit activists, especially those who want to see it wiped off the map, from coming in" according to M. Zuhdi Jasser, Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy.



History proves that Israel is often held to a double standard, and this case is no different. Virtually every nation bars entry to those who wish it harm, yet it’s an international incident when Israel does it. Applicants for visas to the United States, for example, are asked questions about their political views and activities. The US Patriot Act allows the Secretary of State to bar admission to the United States to “any alien whose entry or proposed activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable grounds to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.” The list of people barred or excluded from the United States has included Irish politician Gerry Adams, British singer Yusuf Islam (formerly Cat Stevens) and Austrian diplomat Kurt Waldheim…………and none of them supported movements advocating the destruction of the United States.



The U.S. has also barred democratically elected Israeli legislators under the Obama Administration and in 2005, Narendra Modi (now India's Prime Minister) was to visit New York and address a rally for Indian-Americans in Madison Square Garden but the visit never happened. The State Department argued that, having failed to stop deadly riots years earlier in which Hindus killed Muslims in Gujarat (where he was the top official at the time) Modi shouldn't be allowed into the US.



In short, the current outrage and disingenuous claims that this is not how allies treat each other is really just another double standard against Israel. What principle of democracy states that you have to issue visas to foreigners who are actively engaged in efforts to harm your citizens or annihilate your country? This is all the more offensive given that Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East where Arabs are free, can vote and can live in peace. Israel does not have to prove its commitment to freedom of speech by allowing foreigners into its country who want to exploit that liberty to propagandize against the state and advocate measures to undermine its democracy and seek its destruction.

(full article online)

The last word on the Ilhan/Tliab controversy

So much horseshit and name calling.

The women wanted to go to Palestine and Israel had to stick its big fat nose in their business.

 

[fncceo]

The women wanted to go to Palestine

Do they have a time-machine?

 

[Hollie]

So, was Israel wrong in denying Omar and Tlaib entry to their country? According to Professor Eugene Kontorovich of the George Mason University School of Law ….. “As someone one who has argued that Israel should admit Omar and Tlaib, I must also say that the decision to bar them is legitimate. Countries routinely deny visas to those with extremist views. The U.S. excludes people for ideologies fundamentally hostile to the U.S. ” and, in that regard, Israeli law also provides that, “Israel has a right to prohibit activists, especially those who want to see it wiped off the map, from coming in" according to M. Zuhdi Jasser, Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy.



History proves that Israel is often held to a double standard, and this case is no different. Virtually every nation bars entry to those who wish it harm, yet it’s an international incident when Israel does it. Applicants for visas to the United States, for example, are asked questions about their political views and activities. The US Patriot Act allows the Secretary of State to bar admission to the United States to “any alien whose entry or proposed activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable grounds to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.” The list of people barred or excluded from the United States has included Irish politician Gerry Adams, British singer Yusuf Islam (formerly Cat Stevens) and Austrian diplomat Kurt Waldheim…………and none of them supported movements advocating the destruction of the United States.



The U.S. has also barred democratically elected Israeli legislators under the Obama Administration and in 2005, Narendra Modi (now India's Prime Minister) was to visit New York and address a rally for Indian-Americans in Madison Square Garden but the visit never happened. The State Department argued that, having failed to stop deadly riots years earlier in which Hindus killed Muslims in Gujarat (where he was the top official at the time) Modi shouldn't be allowed into the US.



In short, the current outrage and disingenuous claims that this is not how allies treat each other is really just another double standard against Israel. What principle of democracy states that you have to issue visas to foreigners who are actively engaged in efforts to harm your citizens or annihilate your country? This is all the more offensive given that Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East where Arabs are free, can vote and can live in peace. Israel does not have to prove its commitment to freedom of speech by allowing foreigners into its country who want to exploit that liberty to propagandize against the state and advocate measures to undermine its democracy and seek its destruction.

(full article online)

The last word on the Ilhan/Tliab controversy

So much horseshit and name calling.

The women wanted to go to Palestine and Israel had to stick its big fat nose in their business.

Gee-had denied for two wannabes.

Oh, and because you don’t know the facts, Tlaib was later granted access to Israel but by that time, the intended propaganda tour was a total bust.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The presentation of the commentary by George Mason University School of Law Professor Eugene Kontorovich (not far from my favorite iHOP) was rather a great selection. This contribution complements both the prohibitions against incitement → internationally and domestically.

According to Professor Eugene Kontorovich of the George Mason University School of Law ….. “As someone one who has argued that Israel should admit Omar and Tlaib, I must also say that the decision to bar them is legitimate. Countries routinely deny visas to those with extremist views.

So much horseshit and name calling.

The women wanted to go to Palestine and Israel had to stick its big fat nose in their business.

(COMMENT)

Israel did NOT stick its nose into their business; quite the contrary. Israel had a duty:

◈ The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country. (Article 43 HR)

◈ The international obligations which prohibit all advocacy that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence (“incitement” or “incitement to hatred”), as mandated by Article 20(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”). This also apply to some of the provisions contained in Article 4 of the International Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (“ICERD”).​

You, quite frequently, use this "horseshit and name-calling" defense as an unsubstantiated response and an opposing view against the set of Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL); as well as Human Rights Law (HRL). It is simply a very poor presentation.

..........
Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The presentation of the commentary by George Mason University School of Law Professor Eugene Kontorovich (not far from my favorite iHOP) was rather a great selection. This contribution complements both the prohibitions against incitement → internationally and domestically.

According to Professor Eugene Kontorovich of the George Mason University School of Law ….. “As someone one who has argued that Israel should admit Omar and Tlaib, I must also say that the decision to bar them is legitimate. Countries routinely deny visas to those with extremist views.

So much horseshit and name calling.

The women wanted to go to Palestine and Israel had to stick its big fat nose in their business.

(COMMENT)

Israel did NOT stick its nose into their business; quite the contrary. Israel had a duty:

◈ The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country. (Article 43 HR)

◈ The international obligations which prohibit all advocacy that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence (“incitement” or “incitement to hatred”), as mandated by Article 20(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”). This also apply to some of the provisions contained in Article 4 of the International Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (“ICERD”).​

You, quite frequently, use this "horseshit and name-calling" defense as an unsubstantiated response and an opposing view against the set of Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL); as well as Human Rights Law (HRL). It is simply a very poor presentation.

..........
Most Respectfully,
R

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is an age-old pattern of criminal behavior to use complaints of brutality as a means of drumming-up sympathy to cover wrong-doing. The Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters involved in the Arab Palestinian Conflicts, as well as, associated promoters like the Iranians, create an atmosphere hostility and a climate of hatred as a battleground that feeds propaganda claims such as you make here.

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

(COMMENT)

There is any number of reasons that may explain housing demolitions (everything from building permits to safehouse usage). Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance. There are no settlements that are not in Area "C" (meaning with Arab Palestinians approved authority). Killing is another blanket term used to pour fuel on the fire, a term of incitement instead of actual criminal complaints.

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions, establish barriers, and activating countermeasures; none of which the Arab Palestinians will like, yet bring upon themselves.

And, there are the Psychopaths in the Arab Palestinian community that believe and promote the idea that they are exempt from the Customary and Humanitarian Laws that protect both the people occupied and the occupation force. And in doing so, they create the very environment that they blame on the Israelis. They spend an enormous effect attempting to convince people that they are allowed to attack the Israelis with no consequence for their actions.


.........
Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is an age-old pattern of criminal behavior to use complaints of brutality as a means of drumming-up sympathy to cover wrong-doing. The Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters involved in the Arab Palestinian Conflicts, as well as, associated promoters like the Iranians, create an atmosphere hostility and a climate of hatred as a battleground that feeds propaganda claims such as you make here.

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

(COMMENT)

There is any number of reasons that may explain housing demolitions (everything from building permits to safehouse usage). Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance. There are no settlements that are not in Area "C" (meaning with Arab Palestinians approved authority). Killing is another blanket term used to pour fuel on the fire, a term of incitement instead of actual criminal complaints.

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions, establish barriers, and activating countermeasures; none of which the Arab Palestinians will like, yet bring upon themselves.

And, there are the Psychopaths in the Arab Palestinian community that believe and promote the idea that they are exempt from the Customary and Humanitarian Laws that protect both the people occupied and the occupation force. And in doing so, they create the very environment that they blame on the Israelis. They spend an enormous effect attempting to convince people that they are allowed to attack the Israelis with no consequence for their actions.


.........
Most Respectfully,
R

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions,

Israeli "security forces" are merely armed goons defending Israel's criminal behavior.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is an age-old pattern of criminal behavior to use complaints of brutality as a means of drumming-up sympathy to cover wrong-doing. The Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters involved in the Arab Palestinian Conflicts, as well as, associated promoters like the Iranians, create an atmosphere hostility and a climate of hatred as a battleground that feeds propaganda claims such as you make here.

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

(COMMENT)

There is any number of reasons that may explain housing demolitions (everything from building permits to safehouse usage). Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance. There are no settlements that are not in Area "C" (meaning with Arab Palestinians approved authority). Killing is another blanket term used to pour fuel on the fire, a term of incitement instead of actual criminal complaints.

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions, establish barriers, and activating countermeasures; none of which the Arab Palestinians will like, yet bring upon themselves.

And, there are the Psychopaths in the Arab Palestinian community that believe and promote the idea that they are exempt from the Customary and Humanitarian Laws that protect both the people occupied and the occupation force. And in doing so, they create the very environment that they blame on the Israelis. They spend an enormous effect attempting to convince people that they are allowed to attack the Israelis with no consequence for their actions.


.........
Most Respectfully,
R

Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance.

Where do you think Israel gets all of that land for illegal settlements?

 

[Sixties Fan]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is an age-old pattern of criminal behavior to use complaints of brutality as a means of drumming-up sympathy to cover wrong-doing. The Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters involved in the Arab Palestinian Conflicts, as well as, associated promoters like the Iranians, create an atmosphere hostility and a climate of hatred as a battleground that feeds propaganda claims such as you make here.

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

(COMMENT)

There is any number of reasons that may explain housing demolitions (everything from building permits to safehouse usage). Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance. There are no settlements that are not in Area "C" (meaning with Arab Palestinians approved authority). Killing is another blanket term used to pour fuel on the fire, a term of incitement instead of actual criminal complaints.

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions, establish barriers, and activating countermeasures; none of which the Arab Palestinians will like, yet bring upon themselves.

And, there are the Psychopaths in the Arab Palestinian community that believe and promote the idea that they are exempt from the Customary and Humanitarian Laws that protect both the people occupied and the occupation force. And in doing so, they create the very environment that they blame on the Israelis. They spend an enormous effect attempting to convince people that they are allowed to attack the Israelis with no consequence for their actions.


.........
Most Respectfully,
R

Please, this is a thread about the newly elected Muslim women in the US, what they say and do, etc..... and not about border or any other issues since 1948.

Please, start a thread about the issues you are both discussing.

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is an age-old pattern of criminal behavior to use complaints of brutality as a means of drumming-up sympathy to cover wrong-doing. The Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters involved in the Arab Palestinian Conflicts, as well as, associated promoters like the Iranians, create an atmosphere hostility and a climate of hatred as a battleground that feeds propaganda claims such as you make here.

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

(COMMENT)

There is any number of reasons that may explain housing demolitions (everything from building permits to safehouse usage). Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance. There are no settlements that are not in Area "C" (meaning with Arab Palestinians approved authority). Killing is another blanket term used to pour fuel on the fire, a term of incitement instead of actual criminal complaints.

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions, establish barriers, and activating countermeasures; none of which the Arab Palestinians will like, yet bring upon themselves.

And, there are the Psychopaths in the Arab Palestinian community that believe and promote the idea that they are exempt from the Customary and Humanitarian Laws that protect both the people occupied and the occupation force. And in doing so, they create the very environment that they blame on the Israelis. They spend an enormous effect attempting to convince people that they are allowed to attack the Israelis with no consequence for their actions.


.........
Most Respectfully,
R

Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance.

Where do you think Israel gets all of that land for illegal settlements?

From the Countries that initiated the 67 War

 

[Sixties Fan]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The presentation of the commentary by George Mason University School of Law Professor Eugene Kontorovich (not far from my favorite iHOP) was rather a great selection. This contribution complements both the prohibitions against incitement → internationally and domestically.

According to Professor Eugene Kontorovich of the George Mason University School of Law ….. “As someone one who has argued that Israel should admit Omar and Tlaib, I must also say that the decision to bar them is legitimate. Countries routinely deny visas to those with extremist views.

So much horseshit and name calling.

The women wanted to go to Palestine and Israel had to stick its big fat nose in their business.

(COMMENT)

Israel did NOT stick its nose into their business; quite the contrary. Israel had a duty:

◈ The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country. (Article 43 HR)

◈ The international obligations which prohibit all advocacy that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence (“incitement” or “incitement to hatred”), as mandated by Article 20(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”). This also apply to some of the provisions contained in Article 4 of the International Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (“ICERD”).​

You, quite frequently, use this "horseshit and name-calling" defense as an unsubstantiated response and an opposing view against the set of Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL); as well as Human Rights Law (HRL). It is simply a very poor presentation.

..........
Most Respectfully,
R

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

Active colonization, this, active colonization that.....and nothing which you post on this thread has Anything too do with the Newly Elected Muslim Women which is the topic of this thread.

NO ONE is stopping you from starting another thread to discuss your obsession, just stop posting about it on the wrong threads.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is an age-old pattern of criminal behavior to use complaints of brutality as a means of drumming-up sympathy to cover wrong-doing. The Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters involved in the Arab Palestinian Conflicts, as well as, associated promoters like the Iranians, create an atmosphere hostility and a climate of hatred as a battleground that feeds propaganda claims such as you make here.

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

(COMMENT)

There is any number of reasons that may explain housing demolitions (everything from building permits to safehouse usage). Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance. There are no settlements that are not in Area "C" (meaning with Arab Palestinians approved authority). Killing is another blanket term used to pour fuel on the fire, a term of incitement instead of actual criminal complaints.

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions, establish barriers, and activating countermeasures; none of which the Arab Palestinians will like, yet bring upon themselves.

And, there are the Psychopaths in the Arab Palestinian community that believe and promote the idea that they are exempt from the Customary and Humanitarian Laws that protect both the people occupied and the occupation force. And in doing so, they create the very environment that they blame on the Israelis. They spend an enormous effect attempting to convince people that they are allowed to attack the Israelis with no consequence for their actions.


.........
Most Respectfully,
R

Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance.

Where do you think Israel gets all of that land for illegal settlements?

From the Countries that initiated the 67 War

Oh really?
Palestine was not part of that war.

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is an age-old pattern of criminal behavior to use complaints of brutality as a means of drumming-up sympathy to cover wrong-doing. The Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters involved in the Arab Palestinian Conflicts, as well as, associated promoters like the Iranians, create an atmosphere hostility and a climate of hatred as a battleground that feeds propaganda claims such as you make here.

all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety,

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

(COMMENT)

There is any number of reasons that may explain housing demolitions (everything from building permits to safehouse usage). Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance. There are no settlements that are not in Area "C" (meaning with Arab Palestinians approved authority). Killing is another blanket term used to pour fuel on the fire, a term of incitement instead of actual criminal complaints.

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions, establish barriers, and activating countermeasures; none of which the Arab Palestinians will like, yet bring upon themselves.

And, there are the Psychopaths in the Arab Palestinian community that believe and promote the idea that they are exempt from the Customary and Humanitarian Laws that protect both the people occupied and the occupation force. And in doing so, they create the very environment that they blame on the Israelis. They spend an enormous effect attempting to convince people that they are allowed to attack the Israelis with no consequence for their actions.


.........
Most Respectfully,
R

Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance.

Where do you think Israel gets all of that land for illegal settlements?

From the Countries that initiated the 67 War

Oh really?
Palestine was not part of that war.

You wanted to know where Israel got the territory from and I told you
That’s because the Arabs didn’t recognize the “ 67 Borders” you love to talk about

Those borders are DOA. When asked why Israel should accept the PLO having control over their Holy Sites including being barred from the Western Wall you choose not to respond,
THAT is why E. Jerusalem will always be under Israeli control

https://www.itraveljerusalem.com/ent/?ent-type=jewish-holy-sites

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is an age-old pattern of criminal behavior to use complaints of brutality as a means of drumming-up sympathy to cover wrong-doing. The Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters involved in the Arab Palestinian Conflicts, as well as, associated promoters like the Iranians, create an atmosphere hostility and a climate of hatred as a battleground that feeds propaganda claims such as you make here.

Active colonization (house demolition, land theft, settlements, killing, etc.) can hardly be called public order and safety.

(COMMENT)

There is any number of reasons that may explain housing demolitions (everything from building permits to safehouse usage). Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance. There are no settlements that are not in Area "C" (meaning with Arab Palestinians approved authority). Killing is another blanket term used to pour fuel on the fire, a term of incitement instead of actual criminal complaints.

The more belligerent the Arab Palestinians are, the more the police, intelligence and security forces will implement protective actions, establish barriers, and activating countermeasures; none of which the Arab Palestinians will like, yet bring upon themselves.

And, there are the Psychopaths in the Arab Palestinian community that believe and promote the idea that they are exempt from the Customary and Humanitarian Laws that protect both the people occupied and the occupation force. And in doing so, they create the very environment that they blame on the Israelis. They spend an enormous effect attempting to convince people that they are allowed to attack the Israelis with no consequence for their actions.


.........
Most Respectfully,
R

Allegations of "Land Thefts" are just propaganda claims with no particulars evidence of misfeasance.

Where do you think Israel gets all of that land for illegal settlements?

From the Countries that initiated the 67 War

Oh really?
Palestine was not part of that war.

You wanted to know where Israel got the territory from and I told you
That’s because the Arabs didn’t recognize the “ 67 Borders” you love to talk about

Those borders are DOA. When asked why Israel should accept the PLO having control over their Holy Sites including being barred from the Western Wall you choose not to respond,
THAT is why E. Jerusalem will always be under Israeli control

https://www.itraveljerusalem.com/ent/?ent-type=jewish-holy-sites

Tinmore,
Glad to see you believe Israel having control over their Holy Sites is funny. Keep laughing.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ et al,

I generally agree that control over the "Holy Sites" is a laughing matter. But our friend PF Tinmore has the least ground to laugh over.

Tinmore,
Glad to see you believe Israel having control over their Holy Sites is funny. Keep laughing.

(COMMENT)

The leadership and teachers of the three Abrahamic Religions are generally unenlightened in the recognition and the purpose of recognizing such sites as "Holy." No Abrahamic Religion Holy Site belongs to any one of the religions, but to all, in the name of the one Supreme Being to which they are attributed. The Supreme Being does not care where any or who pays homage to it. The three Abrahamic religions pay homage to the very same Deity. That means that the what is dedicated to God in one of the Religions is dedicated to God in all three religions, and what is consecrated in one religion is dedicated to a sacred purpose in all three religions. This end-fighting between the three religions is evidence that seems to suggest that there is a flaw in all three religions.

........
Most Respectfully,
R

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ et al,

I generally agree that control over the "Holy Sites" is a laughing matter. But our friend PF Tinmore has the least ground to laugh over.

Tinmore,
Glad to see you believe Israel having control over their Holy Sites is funny. Keep laughing.

(COMMENT)

The leadership and teachers of the three Abrahamic Religions are generally unenlightened in the recognition and the purpose of recognizing such sites as "Holy." No Abrahamic Religion Holy Site belongs to any one of the religions, but to all, in the name of the one Supreme Being to which they are attributed. The Supreme Being does not care where any or who pays homage to it. The three Abrahamic religions pay homage to the very same Deity. That means that the what is dedicated to God in one of the Religions is dedicated to God in all three religions, and what is consecrated in one religion is dedicated to a sacred purpose in all three religions. This end-fighting between the three religions is evidence that seems to suggest that there is a flaw in all three religions.

........View attachment 277392
Most Respectfully,
R

Many of the Historical Religious Sites I have mentioned only pertain to Judaism. I am not suggesting that Christians be barred from any Religious Sites
Doesn’t it strike you as ironic that while Tinmore preaches Freedom, Justice and Democracy for the Palestinians he sees nothing wrong with Jews being denied access to their Holy Sites?
Am I the only one who sees the irony and hypocrisy in that?

 

[Sixties Fan]

The terror watchlist was challenged by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose director said Israel should be terminated.

(full article online)

Omar and Tlaib applaud court decision banning terrorist watchlist

 

[Sixties Fan]

Let’s take a look at the transcript:
MARGARET BRENNAN: You were specifically banned by the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu from visiting that country. He faces a very tough election in the next few days. If he doesn’t win, are you going to try to go back and do you stand by your call for a boycott of Israel?

REP. OMAR: I certainly hope that the people of Israel make a different decision. And my hope is that they recognize that his existence, his policies, his rhetoric really is contradictory to the peace that we are all hoping that that region receives and receives soon.

Omar did not say that Netanyahu’s reelection is contradictory to peace. She said his very existence prevents peace. That as long as Netanyahu is alive, peace is impossible.

Ergo, someone needs to kill him: Netanyahu must die.

(full article online)

.@IlhanOmar Issues Sly Netanyahu Death Threat (Judean Rose) ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Sixties Fan]

[ Maybe some lesson has been learned ?........]

Ms Omar reportedly declined the invitation to attend the Party Conference.


Labour invited congresswoman Ilhan Omar as well as BDS chief Omar Barghouti to address Party Conference