Jealousy of tiny humane beautiful Israel drives some to demonize it

Germany and Japan looked this way after World War II. The Palestinians should have considered this before attacking Israel.
There weren't any distinct people who referred to themselves as "Palestinians" right after WW2. They were just Arabs who were indistinguishable from any other Islamic Arab.

The entire invention of a "Palestinian" people was a propaganda ploy to inverse the relationship between David and Goliath. Right after WW2, people saw the conflict (and rightly so) as being Arab vs Jew. Thanks to propaganda, though, they now see it as Israel vs Palestinian.
 
Last edited:
Yep. Any country that is threatening “Death to America,” and targeting Americans for murder (and carrying it out) is an enemy of America.

Um, if calling other countries bad names is a cause for war, the whole world should be at War with Trump's America.

In the meantime, we have antisemites stepping up their demonization of the Jewish country.
Not hard to do when the Jewish Country is acting Demonic.

The entire invention of a "Palestinian" people was a propaganda ploy to inverse the relationship between David and Goliath. Right after WW2, people saw the conflict (and rightly so) as being Arab vs Jew. Thanks to propaganda, though, they now see it as Israel vs Palestinian.

You mean people are seeing Israel blowing up hosptials and schools and thinking that isn't a good look.

Because it isn't a good look.
 
Um, if calling other countries bad names is a cause for war, the whole world should be at War with Trump's America.


Not hard to do when the Jewish Country is acting Demonic.



You mean people are seeing Israel blowing up hosptials and schools and thinking that isn't a good look.

Because it isn't a good look.
With every post you make, you reveal just what a horrible, twisted view of the world and the United States in particular that you have.
Please leave my country. Your kind is ruining this great land for the rest of us.
 
With every post you make, you reveal just what a horrible, twisted view of the world and the United States in particular that you have.
Please leave my country. Your kind is ruining this great land for the rest of us.

I think you should move to Israel if you like them so much.

You'll be a second-class citizen there because you aren't a Jew, of course.
 
You've been saying that for the last six weeks. Iran is going to collapse any minute now.

So we won't let anything get in, and Iran won't let anything get out unless they've paid the toll.

Iran is much better at doing without than Americans are.
again you’re talking out of your terrorist ass, by any objective measurements, Iran has been crushed, humiliated, defeated, and destroyed, and in record time.
 
When something like this I suspect Hezbollah was hiding in the school.
Of course. Jews don’t target schools in order to intentionally murder children. That’s strictly an Islamist thing.
 
Sounds like Iran has been totally defeated, and now helpless. That’s why they’re surrendering everything - to give up the nuclear “dust” and abandon their nuclear-building entirely.

The worry is, of course, is that eventually there will be enough Muslims in America, and they - along with the antisemitic left - will vote in a pro-Iran, anti-Israel Democrat president like Obama.
 
Last edited:
Of course. Jews don’t target schools in order to intentionally murder children. That’s strictly an Islamist thing.

Yet you keep blowing schools up. How is that?

Sounds like Iran has been totally defeated, and now helpless. That’s why they’re surrendering everything - to give up the nuclear “dust” and abandon their nuclear-building entirely.

Um, right. That's why they've shut down the Strait again, because they've been totally defeated.

The worry is, of course, is that eventually there will be enough Muslims in America, and they - along with the antisemitic left - will vote in a pro-Iran, anti-Israel Democrat president like Obama.
You mean some weird religion using their numbers and money to influence politics? That's awful!!!
 
Sounds like Iran has been totally defeated, and now helpless. That’s why they’re surrendering everything - to give up the nuclear “dust” and abandon their nuclear-building entirely.

The worry is, of course, is that eventually there will be enough Muslims in America, and they - along with the antisemitic left - will vote in a pro-Iran, anti-Israel Democrat president like Obama.
By Greg Rosenbaum, Chair of the NJDC Board of Directors

The following originally appeared in Haaretz.

The past week has seen the latest episode in an unrelenting campaign to delegitimize President Barack Obama’s strong commitment to Israel. It’s time to set the record straight on a president who has stood with Israel in times of crisis and has strengthened the Jewish state’s security in concrete ways, ensuring it maintains a qualitative military edge.

From his campaign for office to his recent talk at Adas Israel, a synagogue in Washington, D.C., Obama has made it clear that his commitment to Israel is and always will be unshakeable. “It would be a moral failing on my part if we did not stand up firmly, steadfastly not just on behalf of Israel’s right to exist, but its right to thrive and prosper,” he has said.

Obama’s actions prove his commitment.

Israel continues to be the top recipient of U.S. foreign military financing, and for fiscal year 2016, the administration requested $3.1 billion in funding. The two nations also have begun preliminary talks on a long-term package that would provide up to $45 billion in security assistance grant aid through 2028. Early this year, Israel signed a contract with the United States for the purchase of 14 F-35 fighter jets, amounting to $3 billion.

Since Obama entered office, Israel has received more than $20.5 billion in foreign military financing. Unlike President George W. Bush, who rejected Israel’s request for bunker-buster bombs, Obama became the first president to approve the sale of these advanced weapons, and in the fall of 2012, the U.S. and Israel participated in Austere Challenge 12, the largest joint military exercise ever to be held between the two countries.

Under Obama, the U.S. and Israel have continued Juniper Cobra, a joint exercise that has been held every two years since 2001 to test our joint ability to respond to missile attacks and improve preparedness, as well as coordination between our armed forces.

Unlike Bush, who gave Israel’s Iron Dome system a frosty response, Obama has led the way in funding and supporting the research, development and production of the Iron Dome — which has been crucial in helping Israel defend itself against terrorist rocket attacks — as well as the joint U.S.-Israel missile defense systems David’s Sling, the Arrow II and Arrow III. Since 2011, the United States has provided Israel with more than $1.3 billion for the Iron Dome system alone.

The military cooperation has been so strong that in a 2012 speech to the Israel National Defense College, then-Defense Minister Ehud Barak said, “The security ties between us and the current administration are at the highest level they have ever been.”

In the international arena, under Obama’s leadership, the U.S. has fought for Israel’s full participation in the United Nations, has voted against resolutions in the General Assembly condemning Israel, cast the only “no” votes on five anti-Israel measures last year in the Human Rights Council, and worked to ensure that the General Assembly hold its first-ever session on anti-Semitism. Obama also prevented the Palestinians from unilaterally declaring an independent state.

Under Obama, the United States continues to support the Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation, or BIRD, which facilitates U.S.-Israel cooperation in such areas as agriculture, health care and homeland security. Supporting collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy and Israel’s National Infrastructure, Energy and Water Ministry, BIRD-Energy has facilitated nearly $50 million in U.S.-Israel cooperation.

Obama has been unfailing in supporting Israel’s right to exist and defend itself against its enemies, and has been a phone call away when Israel needed assistance in times of crisis, taking personal steps to help avoid catastrophe when a mob attacked Israel’s embassy in Cairo and providing unprecedented support in fighting Israel’s major forest fire on Mount Carmel in 2010.

Regardless of political attacks against Obama’s pro-Israel record, let’s not forget the mixed record of Republican presidents when it comes to standing with Israel. Let’s briefly give some historical context to the relationship between the two countries under Obama.

Not only did George W. Bush refuse to stand with Israel on promoting Iron Dome and selling bunker-buster bombs, but in 2005 he also froze nearly all U.S.-Israeli joint defense projects. And, just before Bush left office, the U.S. abstained rather than veto a one-sided UN Security Council resolution calling for a cease-fire in the Gaza Strip. Under Ronald Reagan, the U.S. joined a Security Council resolution condemning Israel for its destruction of Iraq’s Osirak nuclear facility and, despite Israel’s strong objections, undermined the Jewish state’s qualitative military edge by selling AWACS surveillance planes to Saudi Arabia. Dwight Eisenhower threated to isolate Israel during the Suez war; and George H.W. Bush opposed loan guarantees to Israel.

There is no question that Obama is committed, both in word and deed, to the safety and security of Israel — and in many ways is more committed than his Republican predecessors.

 
By Greg Rosenbaum, Chair of the NJDC Board of Directors

The following originally appeared in Haaretz.

The past week has seen the latest episode in an unrelenting campaign to delegitimize President Barack Obama’s strong commitment to Israel. It’s time to set the record straight on a president who has stood with Israel in times of crisis and has strengthened the Jewish state’s security in concrete ways, ensuring it maintains a qualitative military edge.

From his campaign for office to his recent talk at Adas Israel, a synagogue in Washington, D.C., Obama has made it clear that his commitment to Israel is and always will be unshakeable. “It would be a moral failing on my part if we did not stand up firmly, steadfastly not just on behalf of Israel’s right to exist, but its right to thrive and prosper,” he has said.

Obama’s actions prove his commitment.

Israel continues to be the top recipient of U.S. foreign military financing, and for fiscal year 2016, the administration requested $3.1 billion in funding. The two nations also have begun preliminary talks on a long-term package that would provide up to $45 billion in security assistance grant aid through 2028. Early this year, Israel signed a contract with the United States for the purchase of 14 F-35 fighter jets, amounting to $3 billion.

Since Obama entered office, Israel has received more than $20.5 billion in foreign military financing. Unlike President George W. Bush, who rejected Israel’s request for bunker-buster bombs, Obama became the first president to approve the sale of these advanced weapons, and in the fall of 2012, the U.S. and Israel participated in Austere Challenge 12, the largest joint military exercise ever to be held between the two countries.

Under Obama, the U.S. and Israel have continued Juniper Cobra, a joint exercise that has been held every two years since 2001 to test our joint ability to respond to missile attacks and improve preparedness, as well as coordination between our armed forces.

Unlike Bush, who gave Israel’s Iron Dome system a frosty response, Obama has led the way in funding and supporting the research, development and production of the Iron Dome — which has been crucial in helping Israel defend itself against terrorist rocket attacks — as well as the joint U.S.-Israel missile defense systems David’s Sling, the Arrow II and Arrow III. Since 2011, the United States has provided Israel with more than $1.3 billion for the Iron Dome system alone.

The military cooperation has been so strong that in a 2012 speech to the Israel National Defense College, then-Defense Minister Ehud Barak said, “The security ties between us and the current administration are at the highest level they have ever been.”

In the international arena, under Obama’s leadership, the U.S. has fought for Israel’s full participation in the United Nations, has voted against resolutions in the General Assembly condemning Israel, cast the only “no” votes on five anti-Israel measures last year in the Human Rights Council, and worked to ensure that the General Assembly hold its first-ever session on anti-Semitism. Obama also prevented the Palestinians from unilaterally declaring an independent state.

Under Obama, the United States continues to support the Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation, or BIRD, which facilitates U.S.-Israel cooperation in such areas as agriculture, health care and homeland security. Supporting collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy and Israel’s National Infrastructure, Energy and Water Ministry, BIRD-Energy has facilitated nearly $50 million in U.S.-Israel cooperation.

Obama has been unfailing in supporting Israel’s right to exist and defend itself against its enemies, and has been a phone call away when Israel needed assistance in times of crisis, taking personal steps to help avoid catastrophe when a mob attacked Israel’s embassy in Cairo and providing unprecedented support in fighting Israel’s major forest fire on Mount Carmel in 2010.

Regardless of political attacks against Obama’s pro-Israel record, let’s not forget the mixed record of Republican presidents when it comes to standing with Israel. Let’s briefly give some historical context to the relationship between the two countries under Obama.

Not only did George W. Bush refuse to stand with Israel on promoting Iron Dome and selling bunker-buster bombs, but in 2005 he also froze nearly all U.S.-Israeli joint defense projects. And, just before Bush left office, the U.S. abstained rather than veto a one-sided UN Security Council resolution calling for a cease-fire in the Gaza Strip. Under Ronald Reagan, the U.S. joined a Security Council resolution condemning Israel for its destruction of Iraq’s Osirak nuclear facility and, despite Israel’s strong objections, undermined the Jewish state’s qualitative military edge by selling AWACS surveillance planes to Saudi Arabia. Dwight Eisenhower threated to isolate Israel during the Suez war; and George H.W. Bush opposed loan guarantees to Israel.

There is no question that Obama is committed, both in word and deed, to the safety and security of Israel — and in many ways is more committed than his Republican predecessors.

Lots of yap-yap there, but Obama sure gave Israel a big F-U on the last anti-Israel UN vote. That, plus his capitulating to the Iranian Terrorists, tells me that someone who sides with Muslims will always side against Israel.
 
Lots of yap-yap there, but Obama sure gave Israel a big F-U on the last anti-Israel UN vote. That, plus his capitulating to the Iranian Terrorists, tells me that someone who sides with Muslims will always side against Israel.

You know, sometimes your best friend is the one who doesn't enable your worst instincts.

Let's be blunt, BOTH parties are in the thrall of AIPAC. The squad has maybe a half-dozen members who question why we support genocide and apartheid, but the Zionist Entity gets all the weapons they want, no matter who is in charge.
 
15th post
Lots of yap-yap there, but Obama sure gave Israel a big F-U on the last anti-Israel UN vote. That, plus his capitulating to the Iranian Terrorists, tells me that someone who sides with Muslims will always side against Israel.
The United States abstained on the UN vote against Israeli settlements.

How did Obama capitulate to the Iranian terrorists?
 
The United States abstained on the UN vote against Israeli settlements.

How did Obama capitulate to the Iranian terrorists?
Abstained was a big negative. It’s like saying “no comment” when someone is accused of something heinous.

Obama rammed the nuclear deal through, bypassing Congress, paving the way for them to get a nuclear weapon. He didn’t even demand release of the six Americans the terrorists were holding!
 
Abstained was a big negative. It’s like saying “no comment” when someone is accused of something heinous.

Obama rammed the nuclear deal through, bypassing Congress, paving the way for them to get a nuclear weapon. He didn’t even demand release of the six Americans the terrorists were holding!
What about Trump? He bypasses Congress a lot.
 
Abstained was a big negative. It’s like saying “no comment” when someone is accused of something heinous.

Our policy has always been opposed to new Settlements in the West Bank, going back to the Oslo Accords Bush-41 signed.

Obama rammed the nuclear deal through, bypassing Congress, paving the way for them to get a nuclear weapon. He didn’t even demand release of the six Americans the terrorists were holding!

because Congress doesn't approve treaties, and it wasn't a treaty, it was an agreement between 7 nations.
 
Back
Top Bottom