Blaster
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2022
- 26,689
- 28,593
- 2,288
Do you deny that she is?Trump called Judge Engoron's clerk Alison R. Greenfield 'Schumer's girlfriend'
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you deny that she is?Trump called Judge Engoron's clerk Alison R. Greenfield 'Schumer's girlfriend'
Thats an insult but its not intimidation or anything illegalTrump called Judge Engoron's clerk Alison R. Greenfield 'Schumer's girlfriend'
Of course it is.In a kangaroo court?
No, as I stated before, THAT'S why people hire LAWYERS.You must be joking
Teabagger "opinion"is Trump shouldn't have to go to court.But not even in a just court except for the court of public opinion
How does this violate the First Amendment?first amendment rights. I know the left hates that.
Bullshit. That's an attack and a license for his mindless followers to attack as well.Thats an insult but its not intimidation or anything illegal
You got nuthin’
The bidens have not been to courtOf course it is.
ALL courts are "Kangaroo" courts.
No, as I stated before, THAT'S why people hire LAWYERS.
Teabagger "opinion"is Trump shouldn't have to go to court.
BUT Hunter and Joe do?
Maybe not.............Just lock them up.
Yep it will show how much white folks think rich white men are above the Law.
You mean the 2 tier Justice System black folks have been under since we got here.
Railroad Trump? What a joke.
So intimidation is now considered as free speech.
Of course it is.
ALL courts are "Kangaroo" courts.
No, as I stated before, THAT'S why people hire LAWYERS.
Teabagger "opinion"is Trump shouldn't have to go to court.
BUT Hunter and Joe do?
Maybe not.............Just lock them up.
How does this violate the First Amendment?
I don't expect a cogent answer since I've yet to see a RWNJ who understand it anyway.
Bullshit. That's an attack and a license for his mindless followers to attack as well.
The judge said was a 'blatant violation' of the gag order he is bound by.Thats an insult but its not intimidation or anything illegal
You got nuthin’
I know.The bidens have not been to court
Particularly the “Big guy”
Its certainly an insultBullshit. That's an attack and a license for his mindless followers to attack as well.
The quack judge has unlimited power to abuse his positionThe judge said was a 'blatant violation' of the gag order he is bound by.
Trump got something, a 5k fine.
So let me get this straight, since the Judge won't allow your Orange God to slander one of his clerks he is abusing his power.The quack judge has unlimited power to abuse his position
now its slander instead of a gag order about the trial?So let me get this straight, since the Judge won't allow your Orange God to slander one of his clerks he is abusing his power.
If Trump told you idiots that spoiled milkAnd when they maintain that “chucks girlfriend” is a legal threat to intimidate the courts and prevail, I will admit my error and congratulate you.
Please explain what makes them unjust and if you say the 1st Amendment, point out the Article as well.The court is issuing unjust orders
How about you point out which Article in the 1st Amendment makes the Judges rule unconstitutional.now its slander instead of a gag order about the trial?
Libs need to get their story straight
The 1st stands on its ownPlease explain what makes them unjust and if you say the 1st Amendment, point out the Article as well.
So Trump posts a picture of the clerk and Schumer, now she is Schumer's side piece. Folks post a picture of Trump and Epstein and Trump calling him the dude, but fools like you claim they weren't friends. Can you explain that?Wow, trump asked why the judge’s law clerk was hanging around Chucky S, and the judge is threatening to jail him over that??
Make no mistake, it’s obvious this show trial is pure politicos BS at this point
This is making Hamas blush
There are 5 Articles, which one makes his rulings unconstitutional?The 1st stands on its own