New York judge threatens to jail Trump for ‘blatantly’ violating gag order



  • Trump's team called the order "breathtakingly overbroad" in a court filing, claiming it violated "virtually every fundamental principle of our First Amendment jurisprudence."
  • It's unclear how long appealing the gag order could take.
Catch up quick: Chutkan in the gag order barred Trump from making public statements targeting Special Counsel Jack Smith or his staff, witnesses or court staff.
 
There are 5 Articles, which one makes his rulings unconstitutional?
There are no “articles” within the 1st Amendment

You are not very well informed even for a lib

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
There are no “articles” within the 1st Amendment

You are not very well informed even for a lib

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The order is elegant. She grounded the order in long-standing Supreme Court law that a trial court has a duty to “protect [its] processes from prejudicial outside interferences” and that “[t]he First Amendment does not override that obligation.”

Then, she carefully focused on conduct by Trump that could reasonably be expected to increase the risk of violence to anyone in his trial process—witnesses, prosecutors, and court staff.

That alone raises the guardrail against appellate reversal on First Amendment grounds, even by this Supreme Court.
 
ALL judges have that power, THAT'S why people hire LAWYERS.
Trump himself, should be able to prove that.
To do it he would have to convince the partisan lib judge to change his stripes

Something quack judges seldom do
 
The order is elegant. She grounded the order in long-standing Supreme Court law that a trial court has a duty to “protect [its] processes from prejudicial outside interferences” and that “[t]he First Amendment does not override that obligation.”

Then, she carefully focused on conduct by Trump that could reasonably be expected to increase the risk of violence to anyone in his trial process—witnesses, prosecutors, and court staff.

That alone raises the guardrail against appellate reversal on First Amendment grounds, even by this Supreme Court.
I dont think trump can beat a stacked deck against him

We the people are getting ever closer to a banana republic ruled by lefty radicals
 
“Why is Judge Engoron’s Principal Law Clerk, Allison R Greenfield, palling around with Chuck Schumer?” Trump posted on social media, along with a picture of her with Schumer and linking to her personal Instagram page.”

Its a fair question and well within American’s free speech rights
 
Being in a cult has robbed you of yours.
/----/ 71 million, and adding more isn't a cult. It's a grass roots movement. It must suck being a democRAT useful idiot.
Trump led Biden by 4 points nationwide in a CNBC All-America Economic Survey poll from Wednesday, and he led by 4 points in a Bloomberg/Morning Consult poll of seven key swing states from Thursday.
Pollsters found Trump performing better than Biden among the youngest voters, leading the incumbent among 18-to-29-year-olds by about 2 points, 45.2 percent to 42.9 percent. The former president also leads among 30-to-39-year-olds by about 11 points, 49.6 percent to 38.5 percent.
 
Bull shit! Excuses excuses excuses always Trumper excuses, for lawlessness!!

What in Gods name does having a picture taken with Schumer however many years ago, unrelated to Trumps case, have to do with his case??

You guys are sickening, to no end!
Can you again post the photo of Trump posing with Epstein, pre-eviction from Trump's properties for solicitation, thereby proving that Trump is as big a pedo as Clinton or Biden?
 
1. Dial back the war on gender. And, in general, the freak-of-the-week approach to civil rights. Equal rights is way more important than "equity". You can't have both.
Yes you can. And you need advocacy for an oppressed group just to get there.

Dial back.. what? What legislation? Tell.corporations to stop making policies? This is overblown, imagined nonsense.


2. Stop trying to use government to "transform society". Society should direct government. Not the other way around.
What legislation? Again, what you are really advocating is shutting people up. Won't ever happen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top