Mushroom
Gold Member
No he was not, he made no false accusations even if the evidence took years to be made public
And much of that was known among a select few even at that time.
More than once I have mentioned "Venona", a super secret project that ran from 1943 until 1980. In which a lot of the diplomatic cables from embassies around the world were intercepted and decoded by the US Government. And a hell of a lot was recovered from that. Even though like MAGIC during WWII, the government could not dare use most of what they collected for fear it would tip off the Soviets and they would improve their signal security.
Instead, I have long believed that things like HUAC and Senator Joe were cut-outs of the highest levels. They knew who some of those people were, and having "mad dogs" chasing out after everybody would help disguise when somebody really was being specifically targeted with very specific information.
And it is not unlike how we handled such information during WWII. Where we knew the Japanese were about to attack a critical US island, but not which one. Until we intercepted a signal that "AF was out of water", and the fleet just so happened to be ordered to sail towards Midway and look to see if there was anything there. And the Japanese never suspected that the battle that turned the tide of the war was only possible because of US code breakers.
I love how some here are screaming how innocent those accused were. Meanwhile refusing to admit that most were spies. Some were even honored by the Soviets for what they had done.
List of Americans in the Venona papers - Wikipedia

The Venona Project | HistoryNet
More than 60 years have passed since the end of World War II, and only now is some once-secret information from that conflict coming to light. It is not

Manhattan Project: The Venona Intercepts
www.osti.gov
And it was not just the US government. The US let the UK also know of many of their own security leaks they discovered through Venona.