Hi JBeukema with Agnapostate mentioned:
Burden of proof rests with he who claims the positive.
No sir. The burden of proof is upon the "
Topic Starter" claiming that
'Contradictions' exist in God's Living Word. Everybody else '
advocates' your hypothesis, or
stands in 'opposition' to your OP proposal on 'two sides' of this deliberation process. JB offered up his cut and paste jobs in the Opening Post to support
'his' conclusion that God's Word contains contradictions, which I answered in
Post #154. Now JB ‘can’ write defending arguments for his original argument OR he simply cannot. Period. Rather than try and defend his theory that God’s Living Word contains all of these contradictions,
he chose to attack ‘my person’ (wonderful) with charges that I am ‘delusional.’ :0)
Anybody who has to put their own belives in that many quotations and qualify a statement so much is clearly delusional. If you god were real, you could give a straight answer without qualifying every other word.
In other words, I am delusional for actually taking the time to support my arguments using Scripture and a host of diagrams (
Acts 13:41 is addressed to you . . .), but this guy has nothing in defense of his original notion that GodÂ’s Living Word contains contradictions. No sir. This JB character is pointing
his finger at me, which finds three witnesses pointing straight back
at him. :0)
If God loves mankind and wants man to love and understand him- why the convoluted, non-sensible, and ludicrous way of doing things? This could have been done MUCH simpler and more easily.
Now God is a simpleton and must do things the easy way, or His Living Word is littered with all of these supposed contradictions. No sir. I challenge
JB and everyone here to cut and paste your seeming contradictions to this thread, with my name at the top of your post, so I can come behind and show these readers that
God Living Word ‘cannot be broken’ (
John 10:35) ‘and’ no contradiction exists anywhere.
I'm gonna go with occam's razor on this one. You need too many qualifiers and assumptions, making your hypothesis inferior
Bullony! Stand up like a man and
defend ‘your’ OP theory that God’s Word is filled with contradictions, OR
run away and admit defeat by your own inability to send back anything resembling a ‘supported’ defending argument. Bring your USMB friends that support your hypothesis, so we can have a nice one-sided debate; where you guys go down in flames. You guys should be warned that Agnapostate tried this same kind of trickery with a challenge on one of my threads
here, which I answered (
here) in Post #82. He had no luck trying to defend his nonsense ‘and’ neither will any of you. Your problem is that this side of the debate has 1000 times the Bible knowledge of all of my opponents combined ‘and’ that is a gross understatement of the facts.
Either send me a defending argument against my supported rebuttal in
Post #154 (
not holding my breath), OR send me some more of your cut and paste ‘seeming’ contradictions to answer using Scripture and more diagrams . . .
Surely you can
out-debate just one
delusional tinfoil hat-wearing idiot . . . :0)
GL,
Terral