Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, Kalifornia is #4.You obviously can’t read. California isn’t in the top 30. It’s actually very well off compared to the red states. Sorry bro.
They're stupid and Democrats know it.It's like the left want to be mocked and ridiculed.
How much do you get every month?
I’m for forcing people out of the welfare system as fast as possible. It’s there to help you for a short while but it ends and you need to do something. Your post was complaining 18 year olds are getting cut off. Of course they are. Get your ass out there and take care of yourself. Why is this even a question? What age do you think it should stop?A safety net actually saves people. You’re for people being saved….right? Compassionate conservatism?
As they should be. They’re idiots.It's like the left want to be mocked and ridiculed.
They have a solution for that. Ignore the crime. If there are no arrests, no crime. Magic.Giving people free money for doing nothing is a bad idea. Any notion that it helps people doesn't take into consideration the fact that idle people get into trouble.
Saves them from what? Getting a job?A safety net actually saves people. You’re for people being saved….right? Compassionate conservatism?
The southern states mentioned all have the highest percentage of blacks. Blacks are the ones getting the welfare. And blacks vote 93% Democrat.Compassionate conservatives above forget that all the poor recipients are GOP voters.
View attachment 655611
Welfare Recipients by State 2024
worldpopulationreview.com
From your article: The ten states that have the highest number of SNAP recipients are: California (3,789,000), Texas (3,406,000), Florida (2,847,000), New York (2,661,000), Illinois (1,770,000), Pennsylvania (1,757,000), Georgia (1,424,000), Ohio (1,383,000), North Carolina (1,298,000), and Michigan (1,180,000).You obviously can’t read. California isn’t in the top 30. It’s actually very well off compared to the red states. Sorry bro.
I think you may be retarded.From your article: The ten states that have the highest number of SNAP recipients are: California (3,789,000), Texas (3,406,000), Florida (2,847,000), New York (2,661,000), Illinois (1,770,000), Pennsylvania (1,757,000), Georgia (1,424,000), Ohio (1,383,000), North Carolina (1,298,000), and Michigan (1,180,000).
It looks like you choose to only present the data per 100K people to get the results that you desire. As they say, "Figurers lie and ..."
Well, you know the rest.
By law TANF (welfare) has a time limit and work requirement. You probably don’t know what you’re talking about.I’m for forcing people out of the welfare system as fast as possible. It’s there to help you for a short while but it ends and you need to do something. Your post was complaining 18 year olds are getting cut off. Of course they are. Get your ass out there and take care of yourself. Why is this even a question? What age do you think it should stop?
Compassionate conservatives above forget that all the poor recipients are GOP voters.
View attachment 655611
Welfare Recipients by State 2024
worldpopulationreview.com
So what it really says is that those who are raised on welfare become criminals when they reach 18 or older, not surprised.Not surprising to human beings but this study found that public welfare programs in the US prevent crime and create better outcomes for people.
New study shows welfare prevents crime, quite dramatically
A new paper in the Quarterly Journal of Economics indicates that removing cash welfare from children when they reach age 18 greatly increases the chances that they will face criminal justice charges in subsequent years.www.eurekalert.org
A new paper in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, published by Oxford University Press, indicates that removing cash welfare from children when they reach age 18 greatly increases the chances that they will face criminal justice charges in subsequent years.
Supplemental Security Income is a United States program that provides payments to people with disabilities who have low incomes. Children qualify for the program based on their disability status and their parents' low income and assets. Until 1996 children automatically continued to qualify for the adult program when they reached 18 years old unless their incomes increased.
As part of changes made to US social welfare programs in 1996 the US Social Security Administration began to reevaluate children receiving SSI when they turned 18 using different, adult, medical eligibility criteria. The Social Security Administration began removing about 40% of children receiving benefits when they turned 18. This process disproportionately removes children with mental and behavioral conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Using data from the Social Security Administration and the Criminal Justice Administrative Records System researchers estimated the effect of losing Supplemental Security Income benefits at age 18 on criminal justice and employment outcomes over the next two decades. By comparing records of children with an 18th birthday after the date of welfare reform enactment on August 22, 1996, and those born earlier (who were allowed onto the adult program without review) the researchers were able to estimate the effect of losing benefits on the lives of the affected youth.
Dumbass. Every state has rich and poor people. Only red states have more poor people on welfare because generally everything about those states is worse: Education levels, Medical facilities, job opportunities, housing values, medium income, violence….. and yes, more welfare.Um, no, those are Democratic voters in red states. You should look at a county by county voting demographics map in red states. You will find the ‘poor” counties vote heavily Democratic while the “rich” ones vote Republican.
Dumbass. Every state has rich and poor people. Only red states have more poor people on welfare because generally everything about those states is worse: Education levels, Medical facilities, job opportunities, housing values, medium income, violence….. and yes, more welfare.