EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,205
- 9,772
- 2,138
And the Joooos!!
You love the Co2 Fraud because it is enriching dishonest Jews like you...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And the Joooos!!
So based on the simple physics of radiative forcing, 1.2C of the 1.7C is from natural warming as the planet returns to its pre-glacial period temperature like it has been doing for the past 3 million years when the ice age began.
You love the Co2 Fraud because it is enriching dishonest Jews like you...
Sorry, clown, not a Jew.
Nobody who understands context, at least.Nobody cares.
Thanks - you just made the ZPF list...
Is that the list of all the people who made you look like an idiot?
Why does the Old Testament say Moses LOOKED DIFFERENT when he came down the mountain??
Because he was banging your ex?
Because the one who came down the mountain was NOT THE SAME GUY, the very first
ZIONIST PEOPLE FRAUD
HEY! Maybe Sponge Bob does.Nobody cares.
This is why we can't have nice things.
Stop throwing tantrums thenBefore opening the thread, I knew it would consist entirely of the logical people presenting evidence, and denier trolls throwing tantrums in response.
I was right. Not that it was a hard prediction to make. It's been the pattern here for over a decade.
This is why we can't have nice things. Deniers -- that is to say, Trump cultists -- are incapable of behaving like adults. They demonstrate that here over and over.
The carbonate skeletons of long-lived sponges give excellent sea surface temperature values prior to their widespread instrumental measurement. A reconstruction using them for SST values shows greater post-industrial warming than prior reconstructions
This is a link to Nature.com/Climate Change which has no paywall.
"Anthropogenic emissions drive global-scale warming yet the temperature increase relative to pre-industrial levels is uncertain. Using 300 years of ocean mixed-layer temperature records preserved in sclerosponge carbonate skeletons, we demonstrate that industrial-era warming began in the mid-1860s, more than 80 years earlier than instrumental sea surface temperature records. The Sr/Ca palaeothermometer was calibrated against ‘modern’ (post-1963) highly correlated (R2 = 0.91) instrumental records of global sea surface temperatures, with the pre-industrial defined by nearly constant (<±0.1 °C) temperatures from 1700 to the early 1860s. Increasing ocean and land-air temperatures overlap until the late twentieth century, when the land began warming at nearly twice the rate of the surface oceans. Hotter land temperatures, together with the earlier onset of industrial-era warming, indicate that global warming was already 1.7 ± 0.1 °C above pre-industrial levels by 2020. Our result is 0.5 °C higher than IPCC estimates, with 2 °C global warming projected by the late 2020s, nearly two decades earlier than expected."
Before opening the thread, I knew it would consist entirely of the logical people presenting evidence, and denier trolls throwing tantrums in response.
I was right. Not that it was a hard prediction to make. It's been the pattern here for over a decade.
This is why we can't have nice things. Deniers -- that is to say, Trump cultists -- are incapable of behaving like adults. They demonstrate that here over and over.
I see you invoking three different fallacies there.I know that temperatures rose in the past. Clearly not because of human industrialization.
If you had even one argument that didn't suck, you wouldn't have to post an avalanche of BS.
Show the evidence man can change climateI see you invoking three different fallacies there.
1. The mistaken belief that since climate changed naturally in the past, humans can't change climate
2. The misunderstanding of how lag time works in climate cycles. After a CO2 spike, it takes centuries for the climate to stabilize at the final higher temperarture. Centuries haven't passed since the human CO2 spike, so the comparison to peaks of past cycles is invalid.
3. And the mistaken belief that CO2 is the only thing affecting climate, and so every cycle has to work in exactly the same way.