New Hampshire governor wants to ban cell phones from schools

^^^ It doesn't matter where I do or don't set foot. ...

Yes it does, because you clearly don't understand what goes on there.






 
How did we cope before mobile/cell phones? Why does mankind now all of a sudden struggle to survive without them?

We survived in the past without a lot of things we take for granted today. That alone is not a good reason to get rid of something.
 
We survived in the past without a lot of things we take for granted today. That alone is not a good reason to get rid of something.
Correct, that alone, but there's other factors/problems that means phones need taken out of schools. When the resistance excuses are, "What about emergency calls, what about what time I need picked up", etc.. just do what we did before the mobile/cell phone was invented, we lived and none of that was an issue.
 
The problems with threads like this are a lack of correct information and language.

The effort is not to ban "cell phones from schools". "Ban" is a bad word and the location description is incorrect.

The effect is to restrict cell phone usage IN THE CLASSOOM. Students will still have cell phones in school. They will not be able to use them during instructional time.

WW
 
Correct, that alone, but there's other factors/problems that means phones need taken out of schools. When the resistance excuses are, "What about emergency calls, what about what time I need picked up", etc.. just do what we did before the mobile/cell phone was invented, we lived and none of that was an issue.

I used a pay phone. Pay phones that no longer exist.

Next?
 
Yes it does, because you clearly don't understand what goes on there.






I understand well enough that school has become such a dangerous place that parents would have to be crazy to let their kids go off to such a place without a cellular phone. If anything, I hate it for every last one of them now.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
 
Nonsense.
HAHAHA. That's your answer?? The 7A gives everyone the right to a jury trial in a civil case over $20. The judge denied that to alex jones.

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law.
 
Jones had a jury trial.
No he didn't . The judge just declared he lost and only let the jury set the monetary punishment. Jones was never allowed to present his evidence sandy hook was fake. Of course, there was also the first amendment argument jones could have used too.
 
No he didn't . The judge just declared he lost and only let the jury set the monetary punishment. Jones was never allowed to present his evidence sandy hook was fake. Of course, there was also the first amendment argument jones could have used too.

1736974109083.png


You left out the "at common law" part. Jones wasn't sued under common law. He was sued under civil law that exists in statutes. There is a difference between common law and statutory law.

You also left out the part where he repeatedly defied the court and refused to comply with discovery orders for evidence.

WW
.
.
.
 
h
No he didn't . The judge just declared he lost and only let the jury set the monetary punishment. Jones was never allowed to present his evidence sandy hook was fake. Of course, there was also the first amendment argument jones could have used too.

Jones had a jury trial. He refused to provide a defense and lost. That's how it works. If you get sued and refuse to provide a defense, you lose.
 
15th post
HAHAHA. That's your answer?? The 7A gives everyone the right to a jury trial in a civil case over $20. The judge denied that to alex jones.

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty
dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law.
Nonsense.
Yes, Alex Jones did have a jury trial. In October 2022, a Connecticut jury ordered him to pay nearly $1 billion in damages to the families of Sandy Hook victims for his defamatory claims about the 2012 school shooting2. This was one of the trials he faced for spreading false information.
 
I understand well enough that school has become such a dangerous place that parents would have to be crazy to let their kids go off to such a place without a cellular phone. ...
You're not paying attention.
 
Back
Top Bottom