- Moderator
- #161
I looked at 108…not seeing the relevance.And the lies continue. Tell me, how does post 108, that you and every pathetic race baiter has studiously ignored, represent teaching 'history.'
How does a law that is so vaguely and broadly worded as to subject a teacher to firing, fines, loss of licensure and lawsuits if she is deemed to have taught something that makes someone ”uncomfortable” going to allow to the history of racism, Jim Crowe, the Oklahoma race riots and civil rights in any meaningfull way?