NEW: Bombshell Hearing Set, Three D.C. National Guard Officers to Expose January 6th Committee

[Lastamender]

Pure nonsense

look at the evidence. And get back to me.

 

[konradv]

I do not expect the MSM to tell the truth but it is another disastrous blow to the narrative. A set up from the word go.

NEW: Bombshell Hearing Set, Three D.C. National Guard Officers to Expose January 6th Committee

redstate.com

I’m waiting for a MAGA “witness”, “whistleblower” or what have you to actually pan out.

 

[Lastamender]

I’m waiting for a MAGA “witness”, “whistleblower” or what have you to actually pan out.

There is not a doubt in my mind that the J6 committee hid evidence. In yours either.

 

[Lesh]

I know that you were here for the big narrative change a little while back.

You all went from "never happened" to we know that it happened, he wanted them to protect the rioters, though.

Try to keep up.

I ask for names and that’s your stupid reply??

 

[OKTexas]

Well Michael Cohen was prosecuted and jailed for his part during the Trump admin. Now Trump is being held to account for his roll. Sounds like fair justice to me

Wow, more commie lies. Cohen was never a member of the Trump admin.

.

 

[Lesh]

Wow, more commie lies. Cohen was never a member of the Trump admin.

.

Hey moron can you read?

“During the Trump Admin”

 

[OKTexas]

Hey moron can you read?

“During the Trump Admin”

Can you read a fucking clock or calendar commie, everything Cohen allegedly did was PRIOR to the Trump admin.

.

 

[Slade3200]

Wow, more commie lies. Cohen was never a member of the Trump admin.

.

I didn’t say he was. Try reading more better

 

[Lesh]

I didn’t say he was. Try reading more better

He’s a friggin idiot

 

[Lesh]

Can you read a fucking clock or calendar commie, everything Cohen allegedly did was PRIOR to the Trump admin.

.

But he was prosecuted and jailed DURING

Which is what was said stupid

 

[OKTexas]

But he was prosecuted and jailed DURING

Which is what was said stupid

You said: "for his part during the Trump admin.". There's no ambiguity there. He had no part during the Trump admin.

.

 

[beautress]

View attachment 931687
so are these people who hide evidence freedom fighters or terrorists ???

~S~

They poor little sheep who have gone astray, bah, bah, bah'ah'ah...

 

[Lesh]

You said: "for his part during the Trump admin.". There's no ambiguity there. He had no part during the Trump admin.

.

Christ you’re fucking stupid

Read the whole sentence and it wasn’t me who wrote it jackass

 

[OKTexas]

Christ you’re fucking stupid

Read the whole sentence and it wasn’t me who wrote it jackass

I did, and as I said there was zero ambiguity. To be accurate your comrade should have said: Well Michael Cohen was prosecuted and jailed for his part crimes during the Trump admin. If that FACT escapes you, perhaps you should go back to your ESL classes. And BTW, excuse me if sometimes you commies are hard to tell apart. ROFLMAO

.

 

[konradv]

There is not a doubt in my mind that the J6 committee hid evidence. In yours either.

I doubt you have a mind.

 

[Dragonlady]

There is not a doubt in my mind that the J6 committee hid evidence. In yours either.

What exactly do you think this so-called "evidence" is going to prove???? That Trump didn't try to overthrow the government. He didn't send a mob to the Capitol?

 

[Nostra]

Do you have a real source, or just redstate.com? Bloggers are not credible sources.

• Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and several failed fact checks.

RedState - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

STFU, one trick.

Prove the story is false

 

[Nostra]

What exactly do you think this so-called "evidence" is going to prove???? That Trump didn't try to overthrow the government. He didn't send a mob to the Capitol?

Reality already proved both of those, Simp.

 

[Lastamender]

What exactly do you think this so-called "evidence" is going to prove???? That Trump didn't try to overthrow the government. He didn't send a mob to the Capitol?

Did you read the article? Apparently not.

 

[Kondor3]

It is true, there is no way around it. No one will be held accountable so you will say it did not happen. People know better. They have proven that election should have never been certified. Go look at the evidence..

Incorrect. You are in thrall to the Big Lie yourself.,.. a True Believer... so I will not take this particular counterpointing any further.