CPAC Plans to Deploy Camera-Wielding Observers at Arizona Ballot Drop Boxes, Sending Democrats into a Panic

[toobfreak]

I am talking about proven fraud, not purging anything.

Jack NEVER addresses the issue, he never debates the substance, like a marionette, he only repeats over and over: "Conspiracy theory, wash, rinse and repeat, go away."

He got nuttin'.

 

[toobfreak]

Stop with the turnabout.

Stop by using the EXACT SAME STANDARD OF PROOF you demand of everyone else??? You made an absolute statement that THERE IS NO ELECTION FRAUD, not in your opinion, or I think, but ABSOLUTE. Now BACK IT UP. Tell us how you know that, show us your evidence. Funny that not a single election fraud denier out there can ever tell us how the fraud is proven baseless and debunked! Yet, somehow you just know--- are you PSYCHIC, Jack?

You have failed to support any of your claims with real data from non-biased sources.

Jack, you have failed to support any of YOUR claims with ANY data from ANY source!
But I like how you try to slip in there that it has to be from a "non-biased" source--- there ARE no unbiased sources! They are all either left leaning, right leaning, or pretenders. That way, as soon as someone DOES produce PROOF, you just say: "Biased Source! Rejected!" You lie, you make unsupportable claims, then you reject anything which does not agree with you.

 

[toobfreak]

You have failed to support any of your claims with real data from non-biased sources.

Tell me Jack, how do you only consult or use sources that are non-biased? Because they SAY they are non-biased? Does that include Fox then? You know--- fair and balanced.

Or do YOU determine they are non-biased? HOW do you determine that when the act of consulting a source implies the source knows more than you, yet, if you are determining their degree of bias, then you are implying you know more than the source!

How does that work, Jack?

 

[beagle9]

Well, 2020 wasn't the same ol' same ol'--- democrats used the excuse and cover of Covid to ramp up cheating to impossible levels, then swing state governments passed illegal laws done ILLEGALLY without authority to further back them up. Now they have institutionalized a corrupt, flawed system--- You no longer need any reason to get a provisional mail in ballot! No one need actually show up at the election site where a person can physically check you out, and you can vote over many weeks! And my guess is that once again, states will require many days to count ballots as they keep discovering "lost" boxes full of them until they get the outcome they want.

It is a corrupted system that needs to be outlawed per the constitution, and any government official charged with administering the laws of this land, and refuses to go back to a fair and just system that is authorized by the constitution, uhhhh should be held accountable for their treasonous acts.

 

[daveman]

MAGA is deploying arsonists at mail boxes and ballot drop boxes

Prove they were ordered to destroy ballots.

 

[daveman]

A lot of people believe in invisible beings in the sky also.

You believe leftism is a successful ideology. Prolly shouldn't cast aspersions.

 

[Lastamender]

No, it has not. Again, it is a conspiracy theory. There have been more voters purged in other states for less reason than this twaddle.
Seeing shadows where none exist is often the sign of cognitive issues. And it would help if you could quote a legitimate news source.
Not some alt-right rag.

Yes it has. Read those articles. No one is being held accountable but everyone admits it happened/

 

[Moonglow]

You believe leftism is a successful ideology. Prolly shouldn't cast aspersions.

I never needed you to tell me what I think and never will.

 

[justoffal]

You can see it coming.

I guess when the GOP catches on and starts doing it too that's when we will have fair elections.

 

[daveman]

I never needed you to tell me what I think and never will.

Telling you what you think is easy.

Nothing.

 

[westwall]

Telling you what you think is easy.

Nothing.

Moonie has more air between his ears than you will find in a basketball.

 

[AHZ]

Except there was no fraud. If you are seeking to intimidate, this will not work.

why do you hate election transparency?

seems like you're undemocratic.

 

[justoffal]

why do you hate election transparency?

seems like you're undemocratic.

Oh they do....they hate transparency with a passion.
I used to think it was a matter of establishing free and fair justification. Then I realized at one point that in the realm of Lefty cheating is an acceptable and justified alternative to accomplish an end and that they see nothing wrong with it.

Exposing their cheating pisses them off and they actually get self-righteous about it. Now that I understand this I have saved myself countless hours of arguing and trying to reason from the standpoint of what's right and wrong.

You will be berated and accused of being paranoid and delusional for exposing their wrongdoing.... Because once again as far as they're concerned you will never be correct... and therefore anything they do in pursuit of what they consider to be correct is righteous.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

why do you hate election transparency?

seems like you're undemocratic.

We already have election transparency.
Stop bloviating. He lost and you threw a four year temper tantrum.

Seems to me you're a sore loser.

 

[justoffal]

We already have election transparency.
Stop bloviating. He lost and you threw a four year temper tantrum.

Seems to me you're a sore loser.

So...cameras at the drop boxes is no problem then....since there's nothing to hide there's also nothing to fear.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

So...cameras at the drop boxes is no problem then....since there's nothing to hide there's also nothing to fear.

Why do you need cameras? To prove a negative? Sorry. It doesn't work that way. You don't get your way legitimized because you say so.
You need to provide proof of widespread fraud...which you haven't.

 

[AHZ]

We already have election transparency.
Stop bloviating. He lost and you threw a four year temper tantrum.

Seems to me you're a sore loser.

no we don't.

hidden counting rooms.

strange pauses.

hackable machines.

unconsitutional rule changes.

non citizens voting.

it's all very unseemly.

you people cheat.

 

[justoffal]

Why do you need cameras? To prove a negative? Sorry. It doesn't work that way. You don't get your way legitimized because you say so.
You need to provide proof of widespread fraud...which you haven't.

Nothing wrong with cameras.
Yep...gonna prove a negative.
It's freedom of choice....

 

[daveman]

Nothing wrong with cameras.
Yep...gonna prove a negative.
It's freedom of choice....

Democrats hate freedom, Democrats hate transparency, and Democrats hate democracy.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

no we don't.

hidden counting rooms.

strange pauses.

hackable machines.

unconsitutional rule changes.

non citizens voting.

it's all very unseemly.

you people cheat.

Conspiracy theories. All the signs of delusional minds.
Seek help..or medication..or both.