Never was a Jewish exodus from Egypt

[irosie91]

I'm pretty sure the Yemeni Jews were converts... at least their king was.. Read up on the Burnings of Najran.

nope----historically the Yemeni jews were THERE even before
the time of the Babylonian exile. Ezra contends with them.
The Najran story is historic revisionism and not germane anyway

 

[rupol2000]

I was acquainted knew him; he was one of the foremost historic linguists of the 20th century.
He grew up in a very anti-Jewish Germany but was so brilliant he was admitted to their finest universities.
He disagrees with you.

linguistics is now highly politicized

 

[rupol2000]

And there is a lot of speculation about how exactly the Ashkenazim ended up in the Pale of Settlement. There is an opinion that Poles from all over Europe gathered them there, but this is not very convincing
They are trying to proof this by the fact that it was supposedly necessary to develop the economy and the commercial abilities of the Ashkenazi were in demand. Then they would have been given equal rights, and would not have been locked in the Pale of Settlement

 

[irosie91]

linguistics is now highly politicized

??? how is linguistics "politicized"?

 

[rupol2000]

??? how is linguistics "politicized"?

In every way. For example, they are trying to mix the Vedic language with Sanskrit, they are trying to promote the "Altai hypothesis", they removed the typological approach from linguistics, according to which Western European languages are not Indo-European at all, they mix Finns with Ugrians, and the Sami were appointed Finns, although these are not Finns, but real Finns are Veneti, and so on.
This is covering up some traces

 

[rupol2000]

let us take, for example, the "Finno-Ugric hypothesis". The Ugrians are peoples originating from the modern Uyhguristan, which were known as Dzungars, Khungars, and Zhuzhani. How and when could they form a linguistic unity with Suomi, when they did not even intersect in history and there was no genetic mixing? Where is Sami blood in hungary (N)?
there it is about 7%, in the north of Russia, in the region of the Onega it reaches 100%. So which of them are finougras?

 

[rupol2000]

And the Finns are historical fens, they were also called veins, and they founded Venice. What are they have common with Suomi or Ugric?
The Sami called the region of the Balts like this, and they really was there

 

[Indeependent]

linguistics is now highly politicized

Translation...
Whatever you post is true and anyone who states otherwise is being subjective.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Who moved to Arabia? As the peninsula became more arid Arabs (Akkadians) migrated north in waves starting 10,000 years ago.

Echoes of a Prehistoric Horror

Neanderthalic bandits were pushed out of the lands settled by the evolutionarily advanced races. The rabid Arab rabble originally came to the desert as criminal fugitives.

No one would choose such lands to live in. They were hideouts. All races in such places, such as the desert, the jungle, the mountains, the frigid zones, and the torrid zones, came there as predators on the run from civilized justice.

They're back. Traitors have let them in as legal immigrants.

 

[irosie91]

In every way. For example, they are trying to mix the Vedic language with Sanskrit, they are trying to promote the "Altai hypothesis", they removed the typological approach from linguistics, according to which Western European languages are not Indo-European at all, they mix Finns with Ugrians, and the Sami were appointed Finns, although these are not Finns, but real Finns are Veneti, and so on.
This is covering up some traces

huh-----linguistics is a CONSPIRACY?

 

[rupol2000]

huh-----linguistics is a CONSPIRACY?

Propaganda tricks of sweeping under the carpet the history of the great eastern military cultures, the heirs of the Aryans, the former military aristocracy.
And a crime cover-up tool
All this grew only in the 20th century, in the 19th it was different. Those who stood at the origins of comporativism would be surprised at what it has been turned into now.

 

[irosie91]

Propaganda tricks of sweeping under the carpet the history of the great eastern military cultures, the heirs of the Aryans, the former military aristocracy.

oh----can you expand on that? "great eastern military cultures.." ?

 

[rupol2000]

oh----can you expand on that? "great eastern military cultures.." ?

The culture of equestrians, which originated in the Eurasian steppe in bronze, which then spread throughout the world, founded Aryavarta, Mittani, Media and Early Rome, Turan, then Sogdiana, Margiana and Bactria, the Parthian Empire. These peoples have always opposed the agricultural slave empires, starting from Assyria.
in ancient religions, this corresponds to the opposition of the heavenly and chthonic worldview

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

linguistics is now highly politicized

Incompetence Is Never Blamed. As in a Bath, Dead Useless Skin Rises to the Top.

It is also political to reward submissive narrow-minded conformists by putting them in charge of everything.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The culture of equestrians, which originated in the Eurasian steppe in bronze, which then spread throughout the world, founded Aryavarta, Mittani, Media and Early Rome, Turan, then Sogdiana, Margiana and Bactria, the Parthian Empire. These peoples have always opposed the agricultural slave empires, starting from Assyria.
in ancient religions, this corresponds to the opposition of the heavenly and chthonic worldview

Every Decadent Elite Worships the Worst of the Past

You mean like the thrill-killing Mongol horsemen, turning the world into a blood-soaked racetrack? Agriculture was an advance of civilization. Hereditary ownership of the land was the flaw imposed from outside agriculture; there was nothing wrong with ownership itself.

 

[rupol2000]

Every Decadent Elite Worships the Worst of the Past

You mean like the thrill-killing Mongol horsemen, turning the world into a blood-soaked racetrack? Agriculture was an advance of civilization. Hereditary ownership of the land was the flaw imposed from outside agriculture; there was nothing wrong with ownership itself.

Technological progress also came from the east, it is just that now it is being hidden due to Eurocentrism. Before the arrival of the Aryans, Europe lived in the Neolithic.
There was no special humanity in agricultural cultures either, there was slavery and cannibalism
the first agricultural empire - Assyria was famous for the stunning luxury and debauchery of the nobility and the extreme oppression of slaves
By the way, the military technology of the horsemen themselves was a real breakthrough for those times. Until the very end of Rome, the agricultural armies were hordes of weakly armed slaves and their battle tactics remained almost unchanged for thousands of years.

 

[rupol2000]

This plot reflects well the essence of the matter

 

[surada]

Echoes of a Prehistoric Horror

Neanderthalic bandits were pushed out of the lands settled by the evolutionarily advanced races. The rabid Arab rabble originally came to the desert as criminal fugitives.

No one would choose such lands to live in. They were hideouts. All races in such places, such as the desert, the jungle, the mountains, the frigid zones, and the torrid zones, came there as predators on the run from civilized justice.

They're back. Traitors have let them in as legal immigrants.

LOLOL.. You don't know anything about the history of the Arabian peninsula.

 

[rupol2000]

LOLOL.. You don't know anything about the history of the Arabian peninsula.

If the Arabs were descended from the Assyrians, this seems to be true. Assyria was defeated by the alliance of Babylon and Media, and most likely they fled to Arabia. At the same time, the alleged proto-Jews could have fled to the north and the Caucasus, probably These were the Ishkuz, some of which took refuge on the Caucasian ridge, and some went to the region of modern Belarus.
From here, by the way, the myth of the expulsion from Egypt into the desert could have originated
Hence, the biblical dislike for Babylon could have originated.

 

[surada]

rupol2000

If the Arabs were descended from the Assyrians, this seems to be true. Assyria was defeated by the alliance of Babylon and Media, and most likely they fled to Arabia. At the same time, the alleged proto-Jews could have fled to the north and the Caucasus, probably These were the Ishkuz, some of which took refuge on the Caucasian ridge, and some went to the region of modern Belarus.
From here, by the way, the myth of the expulsion from Egypt into the desert could have originated
Hence, the biblical dislike for Babylon could have originated.

Why have you dismissed the Akkadians who settled Syria?