1. Archaeological evidence has found that those that built the Pyramids were actually paid workers, not slaves.
2. As the Egyptian Scribes kept very good records of their Pharaohs as well as the Hieroglyphics telling their stories and there is no record of any of the Pharaohs dying in a flood chasing escaping Hebrews, the story of a Pharaoh at the head of his army, chasing escaping fleeing Hebrews in his chariot, or in any other conveyance for that matter, is no doubt false.
That being said, in antiquity, the Hebrews were obviously, like other tribes, nomadic and in the course of their wandering, they settled in the area of what is now Israel, founding the city of Jerusalem. They established a monarchy and in the process, fought other tribes for dominance. Some of their descendants reside there still.
Not that it's a topic of the OP, but today, they are called occupiers, which is interesting since many of those still residing there could be directly connected to their distant founding ancestors and as there has never been any significant number of conversions into Judaism, it would be a safe bet that any DNA research done on those that returned to their ancestral homeland, could be confirmed as ancestral descendants of those founding ancestors. The only real reason they are called "occupiers" is because of the Quran's stance regarding territory that the Muslims conquer from infidels. Infidels that manage to gain back lands which the Muslims took in war, are to be considered "occupiers."
The Torah, which is the first five books in the Christians forty six book Old Testament, may be a load of B.S. (as are the the other books in the Old Testament), but their fight to retain the land they originally settled goes on.
