NC has responded to the Feds

[koshergrl]

If anyone ever wonders why the Supreme court ruled forced sterilization was constitutional, just gander into a daws101 convo.

Isn't it funny that the very people that progressives target to kill are the very population they groom and depend on to put them into power?

 

[daws101]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

Great picture. Now post a picture of what sexual predators do in the bathroom ...

why? that is not germane to the argument .
there is no evidenceoftransgenderpeoplesexuallyassaultinganyoneinpublicrestrooms.
thanks for playing .
****mod edit****
You might wanna rethink that line I deleted. It's not allowed.
statistically it's straight males that do most all of the sexually assaults

 

[daws101]

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

In fairness Harley is right, you are stupid

since he's never right you're using the same fallacy to argue .

I offer as proof your posting body of work

argumentum ad baculum

 

[kaz]

if I wanted a picture of a likely sexual predator I'd need you to send me yours

The way liberals argue. Welcome to my ignore list

 

[TNHarley]

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

In fairness Harley is right, you are stupid

since he's never right you're using the same fallacy to argue .

I offer as proof your posting body of work

argumentum ad baculum

take the bold off when you copy/paste from google

 

[koshergrl]

I love it when duhs pretends she's one of the smart kids.

 

[daws101]

if I wanted a picture of a likely sexual predator I'd need you to send me yours

The way liberals argue. Welcome to my ignore list

pulling up your skirt and running away?

 

[TNHarley]

Gotta give the kid credit, he has no shame

 

[koshergrl]

Keep in mind, this is the thing that argued with me for two days over whether or not the Bronze age took place in the 1500s.

She maintained that it did.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Two. Days.

 

[kaz]

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

In fairness Harley is right, you are stupid

since he's never right you're using the same fallacy to argue .

I offer as proof your posting body of work

argumentum ad baculum

Just cleaning up last posts before you disappear. There is no threat of force anywhere in that post. You're just a dick. Bye bye

 

[daws101]

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

In fairness Harley is right, you are stupid

since he's never right you're using the same fallacy to argue .

I offer as proof your posting body of work

argumentum ad baculum

take the bold off when you copy/paste from google

another false assumption... but it's the best you could do.

almost as chicken shit as this little gem "If anyone ever wonders why the Supreme court ruled forced sterilization was constitutional, just gander into a daws101 convo."- tnnharley

 

[Silhouette]

pulling up your skirt and running away?

Instead of ad hominems, why not describe to the readers here how exactly the lawyers for the defense will define in clear terms how it is that a man is also at the same time "a woman"?

I'd like clear, legal language please. Your ad hominems are a shield for your lack of clarity.

 

[kaz]

if I wanted a picture of a likely sexual predator I'd need you to send me yours

The way liberals argue. Welcome to my ignore list

pulling up your skirt and running away?

No, I don't converse with people who call me a sexual predator, I've never made the slightest suggestion of such a thing to you

 

[daws101]

I love it when duhs pretends she's one of the smart kids.

your gender identity disorder is acting up again!

 

[daws101]

Gotta give the kid credit, he has no shame

kid no that is funny if only by accident

 

[kaz]

pulling up your skirt and running away?

Instead of ad hominems, why not describe to the readers here how exactly the lawyers for the defense will define in clear terms how it is that a man is also at the same time "a woman"?

I'd like clear, legal language please. Your ad hominems are a shield for your lack of clarity.

He's saying that because I informed him people who call me a sexual predator go on my ignore list. Life is too short to waste it on people like that

 

[Silhouette]

No, I don't converse with people who call me a sexual predator, I've never made the slightest suggestion of such a thing to you

It's called "bait and switch" kaz. Daws is diverting attention away from the fact that he has no clear legal language why any of us should accept that a man is "also a woman". So he attacks you. Perhaps he is also hoping that a flame war will erupt and this very sore subject for the Church of LGBT will "go quietly into the dungeons" here?

 

[TNHarley]

24 pages and haven't seen one explanation of how this is discrimination

 

[kaz]

No, I don't converse with people who call me a sexual predator, I've never made the slightest suggestion of such a thing to you

It's called "bait and switch" kaz. Daws is diverting attention away from the fact that he has no clear legal language why any of us should accept that a man is "also a woman". So he attacks you. Perhaps he is also hoping that a flame war will erupt and this very sore subject for the Church of LGBT will "go quietly into the dungeons" here?

Well, it failed. I finished responding to the posts in my queue and now he's gone

 

[daws101]

if I wanted a picture of a likely sexual predator I'd need you to send me yours

The way liberals argue. Welcome to my ignore list

pulling up your skirt and running away?

No, I don't converse with people who call me a sexual predator, I've never made the slightest suggestion of such a thing to you

misrepresent much ,
I never said you were a sexual predator you inferred it .
I was quoting the stats
they are only incorrect if you are not a straight male .
not my problem if fact is too much for your little psyche to bear.