NC has responded to the Feds

[TNHarley]

People don't know a person driving a car has a license until they fuck up..

false equivalence and a really lame analogy.

no it isn't. Just to a bag of dumbfuck like you

since you have no clue as to what a false equivalency or an analogy is your objection is meaningless.

you are meaningless daws. Do you remember truth matters? You are just as fuckin retarded as she was only you can google words better.

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

I guess you do need a tutor. Read the articles that have been posted regarding the Federal funds to be withheld for non-compliance with the CRA. Then read Title IX codified in the US Code at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

Based on the Federal funding in 2014-2015 to the University of North Carolina alone, it could lose $1.4 BILLION from the federal funding sources to say nothing about Federal funding for the State public school system. I don't know where you got that idea about bigot judges!

Those Southern GOP small guv'mint legislators know how to bring home the bacon from DC to keep their seats in the House and Senate for all their small government talk!

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

This is the portion of the CRA, as codified into LAW that is pertinent, fool! 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - It has zip to do with bigoted judges in those Sections of the statute's breadth per se. You can go read it here; 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - Pay close attention to § 1681.

FFS will you tell me how making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom is discrimination

First, are you now implying that the statute I presented to you is the law being discussed, to which NC is objecting, and it has nothing to do with bigoted judges? Let's get this settled first!

It doesn't even matter if you cant show how its discrimination..

So you will not even admit that statute is codified and will not admit your error? Is that what you are implying by responding and ignoring the question? Last chance to clear this up, so the onus is on YOU to stay on point without further straw man deflections!

 

[daws101]

false equivalence and a really lame analogy.

no it isn't. Just to a bag of dumbfuck like you

since you have no clue as to what a false equivalency or an analogy is your objection is meaningless.

you are meaningless daws. Do you remember truth matters? You are just as fuckin retarded as she was only you can google words better.

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

 

[TNHarley]

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

This is the portion of the CRA, as codified into LAW that is pertinent, fool! 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - It has zip to do with bigoted judges in those Sections of the statute's breadth per se. You can go read it here; 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - Pay close attention to § 1681.

FFS will you tell me how making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom is discrimination

First, are you now implying that the statute I presented to you is the law being discussed, to which NC is objecting, and it has nothing to do with bigoted judges? Let's get this settled first!

It doesn't even matter if you cant show how its discrimination..

So you will not even admit that statute is codified and will not admit your error? Is that what you are implying by responding and ignoring the question? Last chance to clear this up, so the onus is on YOU to stay on point without further straw man deflections!

Its not a strawman moron. How is a discrimination law relevant if there isn't any discrimination? Are you seriously this stupid?

 

[TNHarley]

no it isn't. Just to a bag of dumbfuck like you

since you have no clue as to what a false equivalency or an analogy is your objection is meaningless.

you are meaningless daws. Do you remember truth matters? You are just as fuckin retarded as she was only you can google words better.

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

 

[daws101]

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

This is the portion of the CRA, as codified into LAW that is pertinent, fool! 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - It has zip to do with bigoted judges in those Sections of the statute's breadth per se. You can go read it here; 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - Pay close attention to § 1681.

FFS will you tell me how making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom is discrimination

First, are you now implying that the statute I presented to you is the law being discussed, to which NC is objecting, and it has nothing to do with bigoted judges? Let's get this settled first!

It doesn't even matter if you cant show how its discrimination..

So you will not even admit that statute is codified and will not admit your error? Is that what you are implying by responding and ignoring the question? Last chance to clear this up, so the onus is on YOU to stay on point without further straw man deflections!

admit he's has no clue to what he's talking about !?
you must be mad ! mad I say ,,,mad!

 

[NightFox]

How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?

Read Title IX of the CRA and you'll understand, along with the threat to NC by the DOJ regarding funding. The onus is on you as the originator of the OP to understand the basic points in the matter. I'm not your tutor.

That was about segregationist judges

I guess you do need a tutor. Read the articles that have been posted regarding the Federal funds to be withheld for non-compliance with the CRA. Then read Title IX codified in the US Code at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

Based on the Federal funding in 2014-2015 to the University of North Carolina alone, it could lose $1.4 BILLION from the federal funding sources to say nothing about Federal funding for the State public school system. I don't know where you got that idea about bigot judges!

Those Southern GOP small guv'mint legislators know how to bring home the bacon from DC to keep their seats in the House and Senate for all their small government talk!

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

This is the portion of the CRA, as codified into LAW that is pertinent, fool! 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - It has zip to do with bigoted judges in those Sections of the statute's breadth per se. You can go read it here; 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - Pay close attention to § 1681.

Well except for the fact that you're the one that pointed to Title IX of "the CRA", so TN was right , now you're changing your reference, the U.S. code you're pointing to wasn't derived from the CRA (of either 64 or 68) but instead was derived from Tile IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.(signed into law by President Nixon).

It's quite clear that the NC Gov. McCrory and his band of ignorant malcontents simply want to stir up a pile of shit. They haven't a leg to stand on given that stupid legislation they passed, SB 2, clearly is in violation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

That State legislation would apply to ALL schools, colleges and universities receiving any Federal funding as it stands. If NC doesn't comply with Title IX of the CRA then those dumb bastards thumbing their nose at the National Government deserve to take it in the shorts for their stupidity. Any court action that idiot governor and his would take is a sure fail. US law reigns supreme over conflicting State law says the US Constitution at Article VI, Clause 2!

Bottom line is McCrory and his gang of idiot malcontents will only be hurting the people of NC who will have to pick up the final tab for this Tom Foolery and grand standing!

 

[daws101]

since you have no clue as to what a false equivalency or an analogy is your objection is meaningless.

you are meaningless daws. Do you remember truth matters? You are just as fuckin retarded as she was only you can google words better.

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

 

[kaz]

That is not correct. Charlotte passed a law saying that businesses can't discriminate against transgendered people.

But I asked how anyone was going to know if someone was male or female without looking at their genitals and thereby violating their privacy.

Make a stab at answering.

You mean they didn't let transgendered people go to the bathroom like everyone else? They could go to their business, but they had to hold it?

Not your bathroom, toots, you're the tyrant in this. It's up to you how your bathrooms are used, it's none of your business how someone else decides how their bathrooms are used

No answer. Shocker.

Who said businesses are looking at genitals or want to? Who has tried to do that? Your question is irrelevant.

What you are advocating is that a sexual predator who's obviously male can get up and walk into a bathroom full of middle aged girls and no one can stop or even question them

What the heck is a middle aged girl?

I meant middle school girl, nothing obvious is clear to you, is it?

 

[koshergrl]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

 

[TNHarley]

you are meaningless daws. Do you remember truth matters? You are just as fuckin retarded as she was only you can google words better.

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

lack of logical equivalence is what I said.
You posted : a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none

 

[kaz]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

I know. You look at history and that fags and dykes are trying to take the mantel of what happened to blacks in this country as if having to go to the bathroom of their biological gender and not getting tax breaks is the same thing just shows what weak and pathetic dependency whores they are

 

[daws101]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

 

[kaz]

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

In fairness Harley is right, you are stupid

 

[daws101]

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

lack of logical equivalence is what I said.
You posted : a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none

as al way you left out what makes it

that way ( inconsistency.)

fail.

 

[kaz]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

Great picture. Now post a picture of what sexual predators do in the bathroom ...

 

[daws101]

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

In fairness Harley is right, you are stupid

since he's never right you're using the same fallacy to argue .

 

[TNHarley]

 

[TNHarley]

If anyone ever wonders why the Supreme court ruled forced sterilization was constitutional, just gander into a daws101 convo.

 

[kaz]

a lack of logical equivalence. I know what the fuckin term means, dumbfuck.

no you don't

False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

the above is the best description of all your augments.

That is basically what I said. This is why everyone calls you stupid.

that's not at all what you said ...as to everyone calling me stupid that's another fallacy: argumentum ad verecundiam

In fairness Harley is right, you are stupid

since he's never right you're using the same fallacy to argue .

I offer as proof your posting body of work