NC has responded to the Feds

[Ravi]

That is not correct. Charlotte passed a law saying that businesses can't discriminate against transgendered people.

But I asked how anyone was going to know if someone was male or female without looking at their genitals and thereby violating their privacy.

Make a stab at answering.

You mean they didn't let transgendered people go to the bathroom like everyone else? They could go to their business, but they had to hold it?

Not your bathroom, toots, you're the tyrant in this. It's up to you how your bathrooms are used, it's none of your business how someone else decides how their bathrooms are used

No answer. Shocker.

Who said businesses are looking at genitals or want to? Who has tried to do that? Your question is irrelevant.

What you are advocating is that a sexual predator who's obviously male can get up and walk into a bathroom full of middle aged girls and no one can stop or even question them

What the heck is a middle aged girl?

 

[daws101]

But now I DON'T KNOW WHICH BATHROOM TO USE!

you don't know which gender you identify with..??

So I can still use the men's restroom even if there's a non-biological male in there? No one will scream or hit me with a purse?

Probably not , unless your purse is less fashionable then theirs.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

It's quite clear that the NC Gov. McCrory and his band of ignorant malcontents simply want to stir up a pile of shit. They haven't a leg to stand on given that stupid legislation they passed, SB 2, clearly is in violation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

That State legislation would apply to ALL schools, colleges and universities receiving any Federal funding as it stands. If NC doesn't comply with Title IX of the CRA then those dumb bastards thumbing their nose at the National Government deserve to take it in the shorts for their stupidity. Any court action that idiot governor and his would take is a sure fail. US law reigns supreme over conflicting State law says the US Constitution at Article VI, Clause 2!

Bottom line is McCrory and his gang of idiot malcontents will only be hurting the people of NC who will have to pick up the final tab for this Tom Foolery and grand standing!

How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?

Read Title IX of the CRA and you'll understand, along with the threat to NC by the DOJ regarding funding. The onus is on you as the originator of the OP to understand the basic points in the matter. I'm not your tutor.

That was about segregationist judges

I guess you do need a tutor. Read the articles that have been posted regarding the Federal funds to be withheld for non-compliance with the CRA. Then read Title IX codified in the US Code at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

Based on the Federal funding in 2014-2015 to the University of North Carolina alone, it could lose $1.4 BILLION from the federal funding sources to say nothing about Federal funding for the State public school system. I don't know where you got that idea about bigot judges!

Those Southern GOP small guv'mint legislators know how to bring home the bacon from DC to keep their seats in the House and Senate for all their small government talk!

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

This is the portion of the CRA, as codified into LAW that is pertinent, fool! 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - It has zip to do with bigoted judges in those Sections of the statute's breadth per se. You can go read it here; 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - Pay close attention to § 1681.

 

[TNHarley]

How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?

Read Title IX of the CRA and you'll understand, along with the threat to NC by the DOJ regarding funding. The onus is on you as the originator of the OP to understand the basic points in the matter. I'm not your tutor.

That was about segregationist judges

I guess you do need a tutor. Read the articles that have been posted regarding the Federal funds to be withheld for non-compliance with the CRA. Then read Title IX codified in the US Code at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

Based on the Federal funding in 2014-2015 to the University of North Carolina alone, it could lose $1.4 BILLION from the federal funding sources to say nothing about Federal funding for the State public school system. I don't know where you got that idea about bigot judges!

Those Southern GOP small guv'mint legislators know how to bring home the bacon from DC to keep their seats in the House and Senate for all their small government talk!

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

This is the portion of the CRA, as codified into LAW that is pertinent, fool! 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - It has zip to do with bigoted judges in those Sections of the statute's breadth per se. You can go read it here; 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - Pay close attention to § 1681.

FFS will you tell me how making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom is discrimination

 

[daws101]

It will be tossed out for lack of standing.

How?

if McCrory's speech is any guide then the law suite has no merit.


Merit (law)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Merits (Old French merite, reward, moral worth) is a legal concept referring to the inherent rights and wrongs of a legal case, absent of any emotional or technical biases. The evidence is solely applied to cases decided on the merits, and any procedural matters are discounted.

 

[Silhouette]

and they are suing the Justice Dept.
Waiting for a link
It is breaking on reuters

It will be tossed out for lack of standing.

So, the Governor of the State of NC doesn't have standing to enforce the laws of his state; under threat of blackmail by the Justice Department who has no legal standing to unilaterally declare a mental condition as "having rights as a sex"?

Have fun in la la land. The case will go forward. And, since the Governor called the bullshit cards on the table, the burden is upon the defendants to clearly (clarity will be a core part of this case) define how it is a man "is actually a woman". And, to clearly define how just some men get to self-diagnose this farce while others don't.

 

[daws101]

All of this wouldn't be necessary if transsexuals were not compelled to deny science and sex designated bathrooms.

How many trannies are there? Seriously, conservatives are making such a huge ordeal out of an issue they will likely never encounter themselves. I'm 33 years old and I can probably count on one hand the number of times I've seen a transexual out in the general public.

Percentage of population transgender
0.3 percent
An earlier report published in April 2011 by the Williams Institute estimated that 3.8 percent of Americans identified as gay/lesbian, bisexual, or transgender: 1.7 percent as lesbian or gay, 1.8 percent as bisexual, and 0.3 percent as transgender.
LGBT demographics of the United States - Wikipedia ...
700,000.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Read Title IX of the CRA and you'll understand, along with the threat to NC by the DOJ regarding funding. The onus is on you as the originator of the OP to understand the basic points in the matter. I'm not your tutor.

That was about segregationist judges

I guess you do need a tutor. Read the articles that have been posted regarding the Federal funds to be withheld for non-compliance with the CRA. Then read Title IX codified in the US Code at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

Based on the Federal funding in 2014-2015 to the University of North Carolina alone, it could lose $1.4 BILLION from the federal funding sources to say nothing about Federal funding for the State public school system. I don't know where you got that idea about bigot judges!

Those Southern GOP small guv'mint legislators know how to bring home the bacon from DC to keep their seats in the House and Senate for all their small government talk!

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

This is the portion of the CRA, as codified into LAW that is pertinent, fool! 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - It has zip to do with bigoted judges in those Sections of the statute's breadth per se. You can go read it here; 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - Pay close attention to § 1681.

FFS will you tell me how making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom is discrimination

First, are you now implying that the statute I presented to you is the law being discussed, to which NC is objecting, and it has nothing to do with bigoted judges? Let's get this settled first!

 

[daws101]

That is not correct. Charlotte passed a law saying that businesses can't discriminate against transgendered people.

But I asked how anyone was going to know if someone was male or female without looking at their genitals and thereby violating their privacy.

Make a stab at answering.

People don't know a person driving a car has a license until they **** up..

false equivalence and a really lame analogy.

 

[TNHarley]

That was about segregationist judges

I guess you do need a tutor. Read the articles that have been posted regarding the Federal funds to be withheld for non-compliance with the CRA. Then read Title IX codified in the US Code at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

Based on the Federal funding in 2014-2015 to the University of North Carolina alone, it could lose $1.4 BILLION from the federal funding sources to say nothing about Federal funding for the State public school system. I don't know where you got that idea about bigot judges!

Those Southern GOP small guv'mint legislators know how to bring home the bacon from DC to keep their seats in the House and Senate for all their small government talk!

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

This is the portion of the CRA, as codified into LAW that is pertinent, fool! 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - It has zip to do with bigoted judges in those Sections of the statute's breadth per se. You can go read it here; 20 U.S. Code Chapter 38 - DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS - Pay close attention to § 1681.

FFS will you tell me how making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom is discrimination

First, are you now implying that the statute I presented to you is the law being discussed, to which NC is objecting, and it has nothing to do with bigoted judges? Let's get this settled first!

It doesn't even matter if you cant show how its discrimination..

 

[daws101]

It's quite clear that the NC Gov. McCrory and his band of ignorant malcontents simply want to stir up a pile of shit. They haven't a leg to stand on given that stupid legislation they passed, SB 2, clearly is in violation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

That State legislation would apply to ALL schools, colleges and universities receiving any Federal funding as it stands. If NC doesn't comply with Title IX of the CRA then those dumb bastards thumbing their nose at the National Government deserve to take it in the shorts for their stupidity. Any court action that idiot governor and his would take is a sure fail. US law reigns supreme over conflicting State law says the US Constitution at Article VI, Clause 2!

Bottom line is McCrory and his gang of idiot malcontents will only be hurting the people of NC who will have to pick up the final tab for this Tom Foolery and grand standing!

How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?

Read Title IX of the CRA and you'll understand, along with the threat to NC by the DOJ regarding funding. The onus is on you as the originator of the OP to understand the basic points in the matter. I'm not your tutor.

That was about segregationist judges

I guess you do need a tutor. Read the articles that have been posted regarding the Federal funds to be withheld for non-compliance with the CRA. Then read Title IX codified in the US Code at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

Based on the Federal funding in 2014-2015 to the University of North Carolina alone, it could lose $1.4 BILLION from the federal funding sources to say nothing about Federal funding for the State public school system. I don't know where you got that idea about bigot judges!

Those Southern GOP small guv'mint legislators know how to bring home the bacon from DC to keep their seats in the House and Senate for all their small government talk!

bigot judges is what title IX of the CRA is.
How does making all people use their proper sex designated bathroom discrimination? Please elaborate.

proof?

 

[TNHarley]

That is not correct. Charlotte passed a law saying that businesses can't discriminate against transgendered people.

But I asked how anyone was going to know if someone was male or female without looking at their genitals and thereby violating their privacy.

Make a stab at answering.

People don't know a person driving a car has a license until they **** up..

false equivalence and a really lame analogy.

no it isn't. Just to a bag of dumbfuck like you

 

[Silhouette]

It doesn't even matter if you cant show how its discrimination..

Bingo. Clarity will be 90% of this case. Good luck defendants! Of note are other rights which will come up. The rights of those born with a womb (women and girls) to segregated private hygiene retreats where they bare their intimate parts of their bodies with the expectation that men will be nowhere around. Those rights long established by the sign "women" above the door to those segregated hygiene retreats.

 

[daws101]

and they are suing the Justice Dept.
Waiting for a link
It is breaking on reuters

It will be tossed out for lack of standing.

So, the Governor of the State of NC doesn't have standing to enforce the laws of his state; under threat of blackmail by the Justice Department who has no legal standing to unilaterally declare a mental condition as "having rights as a sex"?

Have fun in la la land. The case will go forward. And, since the Governor called the bullshit cards on the table, the burden is upon the defendants to clearly (clarity will be a core part of this case) define how it is a man "is actually a woman". And, to clearly define how just some men get to self-diagnose this farce while others don't.

then you woke up...

 

[daws101]

That is not correct. Charlotte passed a law saying that businesses can't discriminate against transgendered people.

But I asked how anyone was going to know if someone was male or female without looking at their genitals and thereby violating their privacy.

Make a stab at answering.

People don't know a person driving a car has a license until they **** up..

false equivalence and a really lame analogy.

no it isn't. Just to a bag of dumbfuck like you

since you have no clue as to what a false equivalency or an analogy is your objection is meaningless.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

best i've heard yet: Obama can't sue North Carolina because NC doesn't feeel like NC anymore......

 

[Silhouette]

Oh daws. You knew the day would come when clarity would be demanded on the insanity of your cult. Now your ilk must provide the entire country with a detailed explanation of how men are "actually women". You're fucked.

 

[TNHarley]

That is not correct. Charlotte passed a law saying that businesses can't discriminate against transgendered people.

But I asked how anyone was going to know if someone was male or female without looking at their genitals and thereby violating their privacy.

Make a stab at answering.

People don't know a person driving a car has a license until they **** up..

false equivalence and a really lame analogy.

no it isn't. Just to a bag of dumbfuck like you

since you have no clue as to what a false equivalency or an analogy is your objection is meaningless.

you are meaningless daws. Do you remember truth matters? You are just as fuckin retarded as she was only you can google words better.

 

[daws101]

Oh daws. You knew the day would come when clarity would be demanded on the insanity of your cult. Now your ilk must provide the entire country with a detailed explanation of how men are "actually women". You're fucked.

yes dear now take you anti psychotics and go play with the other homophobes.

 

[daws101]

That is not correct. Charlotte passed a law saying that businesses can't discriminate against transgendered people.

But I asked how anyone was going to know if someone was male or female without looking at their genitals and thereby violating their privacy.

Make a stab at answering.

People don't know a person driving a car has a license until they **** up..

false equivalence and a really lame analogy.

no it isn't. Just to a bag of dumbfuck like you

since you have no clue as to what a false equivalency or an analogy is your objection is meaningless.

you are meaningless daws. Do you remember truth matters? You are just as fuckin retarded as she was only you can google words better.

so tell me what a false equivalency is...

fallacy of composition