The religion stuff on this tread is not very interesing, but I have to comment about signature line of Ding.
{...
Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe. They confuse critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something they never do.
...}
That is totally untrue.
Socialism really is just the realization that you need many different things in your economic infrastructure, in order to survive and be happy, so there is no point in leaving it up to chance that private enterprise will provide you with what is needed, at reasonable prices. It makes more sense for people to be more active in planning and controlling their own community, and pooling resources to create all of the infrastructure they need. That is not just roads, schools, museums, harbors, etc., but jobs, housing, food, etc. The best example of socialism in the US likely is employee owned businesses, like the Chicago Northwesten Railway. Expand that from just employee investment to society investment, and you have socialism. Perfectly normal, natural, and far more efficient.
Socialism does not seek equality, but it tries to prevent anyone from deliberately attempting to extort by manipulating shortages or any other form of monopoly.
There is nothing remotely like religion in socialism. It is simply the most pragmatic approach to modern needs.
Socialism in no way attempts to abolish any private property. Socialism only attempts to provide alternatives when an abusive monopoly does occur. Socialism in no way attempts to abolish family, and has absolutely no intersection with family or tribe, in any way.
Socialism in no way attempts to abolish religion, and instead usually promotes the positive social values of all religions.
It appears you know little of Marxism, which is a very idealistic views from around 1840, when the industrial revolution was looking incredibly threatening to individuals, as it destroyed cottage industries. What you likely are referring to actually was the Stalinism that took over after Stalin murdered all the Communists, and Stalinism is not at all socialist. It is ultimate capitalism, because it is where the single entrapeneur also dictates the state. It is also known as state capitalism. Not even remotely at all similar to any type of socialism.