eots
no fly list
stfuwhy do you try to deceive like that...wtc 7 did not have a 110 story building fall on it you phrase it that way in a flailing attempt to connect the damage from falling debris to the collapse of wtc 7 when nist sates that regardless of structural damage the building still would have collapsed from the fires alone...wtf is wrong with you ??
The collapse of wtc 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires. A 38-story skyscraper that burned for 18 hours in 1991, did not collapse
even without the structural damage, wtc 7 would have collapsed from the fires that the debris initiated. The growth and spread of the lower-floor fires due to the loss of water supply to the sprinklers from the city mains was enough to initiate the collapse of the entire building due to buckling of a critical column in the northeast region of the building.
The fire in philadelphia was being fought the entire time it was burning. Wtc7 had absolutely no firefighting going on for hours.
Not a valid comparison.
the fires in wtc 7 were similar to those that have occurred in several tall buildings where the automatic sprinklers did not function or were not present. These other buildings, including philadelphia's one meridian plaza,
wtc.nist.gov/media/nist_ncstar_1a_for_public_comment.pdf