NASA predicts Megadroughts

[ChrisL]

You must be on the right, communist, and not know it; at least, i am trying to become a better poet.

Nonsense!

 

[bripat9643]

Who built the Saturn V rocket?

The socialism of command economics. Capitalism had no profit motive without it.

Private companies built it, numskull. It's true they wouldn't have built unless government paid for it. However, all that means is that American consumers didn't really want it.

Yes, socialism bailed out capitalism due to our (social) Space Race.

Socialism never bailed out shit in the entire history of socialism. It doesn't have any money of its own, so how can it bail anything out?

Socialism won our Space Race; capitalism has yet to discover a profit motive to even go to the moon.

That's another way of saying no one wants to pay for it. Capitalism only produces things that people want enough to pay for. Government, on the other hand, is great for producing things nobody wants.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You must be on the right, communist, and not know it; at least, i am trying to become a better poet.

Possibly another Jake Starkey sock account

 

[jc456]

You must be on the right, communist, and not know it; at least, i am trying to become a better poet.

and failing.

 

[danielpalos]

You must be on the right, communist, and not know it; at least, i am trying to become a better poet.

Nonsense!

Yes, that is all you usually have.

 

[danielpalos]

The socialism of command economics. Capitalism had no profit motive without it.

Private companies built it, numskull. It's true they wouldn't have built unless government paid for it. However, all that means is that American consumers didn't really want it.

Yes, socialism bailed out capitalism due to our (social) Space Race.

Socialism never bailed out shit in the entire history of socialism. It doesn't have any money of its own, so how can it bail anything out?

Socialism won our Space Race; capitalism has yet to discover a profit motive to even go to the moon.

That's another way of saying no one wants to pay for it. Capitalism only produces things that people want enough to pay for. Government, on the other hand, is great for producing things nobody wants.

Capitalism never wants to pay for social costs; mooch.

 

[danielpalos]

You must be on the right, communist, and not know it; at least, i am trying to become a better poet.

and failing.

failing at what, at least my mine rhymed.

 

[bripat9643]

Private companies built it, numskull. It's true they wouldn't have built unless government paid for it. However, all that means is that American consumers didn't really want it.

Yes, socialism bailed out capitalism due to our (social) Space Race.

Socialism never bailed out shit in the entire history of socialism. It doesn't have any money of its own, so how can it bail anything out?

Socialism won our Space Race; capitalism has yet to discover a profit motive to even go to the moon.

That's another way of saying no one wants to pay for it. Capitalism only produces things that people want enough to pay for. Government, on the other hand, is great for producing things nobody wants.

Capitalism never wants to pay for social costs; mooch.

You mean it doesn't force me to pay for your boondoggles. Correct. That's the beauty of capitalism. As opposed to socialism that is happy to dispose of millions of lives for whatever whims the rulers wish to indulge.

 

[bodecea]

Just to make it clear

NASA lies ......they will not reveal all...

Extraterrestial craft and all that....

Astronauts like Edgar Mitchell - from the Apollo 14 is telling the world about extraterrestial life.... and all he saw

Fuck lying NASA

Lolololololol

 

[Yarddog]

No, that is not it at all. It is that the ice caps melt, which in turn cools the ocean, which in turn creates terrible storms, from hurricanes to blizzards. Hey, I'm not a scientist. These are just things that I've read about global warming.

There has never been a period in Earths history where these things have not happened. Google ANY year you wish and add storm to the search. You will find that nothing is different now than back in the past. Well, that's not exactly true. The worst storms that man has experienced were in the past. In 1862 there was a storm that lasted for 4 weeks and flooded California's central valley. That whole area in blue that you see on the map below was under water. Sacramento figured out the only way to deal with it was to raise the city. So that's what they did.

There has not been a storm like that in the US since. But there will be another.....and it won't have the slightest thing to do with man.

"The Pacific slope has been visited by the most disastrous flood that has occurred since its settlement by white men. From Sacramento northward to the Columbia River, in California, Nevada Territory, and Oregon, all the streams have risen to a great height, flooded the valleys, [inundated towns, swept away mills, dams, flumes, houses, fences, domestic animals, ruined fields and effected damage, estimated at $10,000,000. All Sacramento City, save a small part of one street, part of Marysville, part of Santa Rosa, part of Auburn, part of Sonora, part of Nevada, and part of Napa, not to speak of less important towns, were under water.

The rainy season commenced on the 8th of November, and for four weeks, with scarcely any intermission, the rain continued to fall very gently in San Francisco, but in heavy showers in the interior. According to the statement of a Grass Valley paper, nine inches of rain fell there in thirty-six hours on the 7th and 8th inst. Whether, it is possible that so much rain could fall in thirty-six hours I will not decide; but it is certain that, the amount was great, for the next day the river-beds were full almost to the hilltops. The North Fork of the American River at Auburn rose thirty-five feet, and in many other mountain streams the rise was almost as great. On the 9th the flood reached the low land of the Sacramento Valley. "
THE GREAT FLOOD IN CALIFORNIA. - Great Destruction of Property Damage 10 000 000. - NYTimes.com

Well, the one thing that causes me to doubt global warming is not really weather patterns, but would be the fact that volcanoes and other natural processes also contribute to green house gases. BUT, why would all of those climatologists lie? What would they have to gain by lying to us? This is the question. There is pretty much a consensus amongst them that global warming is real.

guaranteed money. Lots and lots of money. Money that comes from us the people of the US. No where else in the world, just us. Ask the warmer alarmists why that is and they will tell you it is due to our over use, yet, they won't concede that the US has adjusted. They are evil people who want human kind to die. They hate humans. They look for solutions to lose human life. Tax credits is one such move.

"Evil people who hate humans." Lol. Yes, you sound like someone who has his shit together. Look, I'm not interested in the partisan bickering. K? I had some questions and I had them answered. I don't what your problem is.

Hey, you're in a message board where that is all that is done. You don't want to get into a debate, fine. But the posts are public and viewable and I found your tactic a bit sloppy for what you now claim. You got the reactions you got based on your delivery methodology. My apologize if I came off harsh. It is what happens here daily.

Do you still believe the Arctic has melted?

If an Artic Melt was a sandwich, what would it be ? toasted Rie Bread , mozzerella or pepper jack, grilled onions, Snow Crab and bacon ,all grilled in New Foundland butter ! ahhh come on guys, we got bigger problems to slove. lets eat, Im hungry.

 

[Crick]

You mean it doesn't force me to pay for your boondoggles. Correct. That's the beauty of capitalism. As opposed to socialism that is happy to dispose of millions of lives for whatever whims the rulers wish to indulge.

You need a course in basic economics

 

[bripat9643]

You mean it doesn't force me to pay for your boondoggles. Correct. That's the beauty of capitalism. As opposed to socialism that is happy to dispose of millions of lives for whatever whims the rulers wish to indulge.

You need a course in basic economics

That is basic economics. However, it's not the lies and bullshit that socialists normally spew.

 

[percysunshine]

NASA could never make it to the moon today. The pilots would never trust the NASA scientists. Once you get caught lying in that business, it is all over.

 

[ChrisL]

NASA could never make it to the moon today. The pilots would never trust the NASA scientists. Once you get caught lying in that business, it is all over.

I think this is all the fault of the politicians. The far left and far right destroy everything they come into contact with. I can just imagine if we ever did have a single payer system for healthcare. It would be a complete disaster, I'm sure. Then we would have partisan politics in our healthcare too!

 

[KissMy]

People should read about what happened in 30's in the west. It was truly horrible and what NASA is predicting is much worse. Forget about global warming. It;s too lake to stop this disaster. We should be working now on how to deal with the problem because it will be huge.

Actually the solution is quite simple.

Just give California back to Mexico.

You Stupid Idiot! - California has the largest economy of any US states by nearly double. California carries the USA on it's back. By itself California would be a top 10 Global economy. We need to git rid of Stupid Idiots Like You & keep California!

 

[bripat9643]

NASA could never make it to the moon today. The pilots would never trust the NASA scientists. Once you get caught lying in that business, it is all over.

I think this is all the fault of the politicians. The far left and far right destroy everything they come into contact with. I can just imagine if we ever did have a single payer system for healthcare. It would be a complete disaster, I'm sure. Then we would have partisan politics in our healthcare too!

How do you propose to have government run healthcare without politicians? Why do you think putting government in charge of anything is always a problem?

 

[ChrisL]

NASA could never make it to the moon today. The pilots would never trust the NASA scientists. Once you get caught lying in that business, it is all over.

I think this is all the fault of the politicians. The far left and far right destroy everything they come into contact with. I can just imagine if we ever did have a single payer system for healthcare. It would be a complete disaster, I'm sure. Then we would have partisan politics in our healthcare too!

How do you propose to have government run healthcare without politicians? Why do you think putting government in charge of anything is always a problem?

Duh, that's what I said.

 

[danielpalos]

NASA could never make it to the moon today. The pilots would never trust the NASA scientists. Once you get caught lying in that business, it is all over.

dude, command economics could fix autopilot as a Standard for well regulated Commerce in space.

 

[bripat9643]

NASA could never make it to the moon today. The pilots would never trust the NASA scientists. Once you get caught lying in that business, it is all over.

dude, command economics could fix autopilot as a Standard for well regulated Commerce in space.

Command economics has been a failure every time it has been tried.

 

[danielpalos]

NASA could never make it to the moon today. The pilots would never trust the NASA scientists. Once you get caught lying in that business, it is all over.

dude, command economics could fix autopilot as a Standard for well regulated Commerce in space.

Command economics has been a failure every time it has been tried.

don't you get tired of appealing to ignorance? socialism already took us to the moon and back, last millennium.