NASA predicts Megadroughts

Flopper

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
25,673
Reaction score
5,732
Points
280
Location
Washington
People should read about what happened in 30's in the west. It was truly horrible and what NASA is predicting is much worse. Forget about global warming. It;s too lake to stop this disaster. We should be working now on how to deal with the problem because it will be huge.
 

HenryBHough

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
30,923
Reaction score
6,935
Points
1,140
Location
Oak Grove, Massachusetts
People should read about what happened in 30's in the west. It was truly horrible and what NASA is predicting is much worse. Forget about global warming. It;s too lake to stop this disaster. We should be working now on how to deal with the problem because it will be huge.
Actually the solution is quite simple.

Just give California back to Mexico.
 

elektra

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
9,311
Reaction score
1,353
Points
255
Location
Temecula California
NASA is predicting the weather, on falsified data?

I wonder if our billion dollar space agency has a nice colored picture for us, that makes it "science".
 

Nutz

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
14,814
Reaction score
1,809
Points
265
Isn't that movie called, Interstellar
 

skye

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
41,840
Reaction score
26,280
Points
2,635
I don't trust NASA

Enough said.
 

skye

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
41,840
Reaction score
26,280
Points
2,635
Just to make it clear

NASA lies ......they will not reveal all...

Extraterrestial craft and all that....

Astronauts like Edgar Mitchell - from the Apollo 14 is telling the world about extraterrestial life.... and all he saw

Fuck lying NASA
 

Tom Sweetnam

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
3,780
Reaction score
983
Points
955
Location
8000' up in the san juan mountain foothills
I don't trust NASA

Enough said.
Most of NASA's retired scientists don't trust NASA. The little negro and his ignorant warmie minions have dragged the agency back 25 years. And what was it that Buckwheat wanted to do in regard to NASA? He wanted them to "reach out" to Islam? Welcome to the 2015 state of empirical science in America.
 

elektra

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
9,311
Reaction score
1,353
Points
255
Location
Temecula California
NASA, an agency of government designed as a job welfare program for democrats who partied through a government University.
 

Treeshepherd

Wood Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
18,738
Reaction score
7,133
Points
360
Location
Endor
Causes of Calif. drought natural not man-made NOAA

NOAA says California's drought is not man-made. I think they got this one right. There's been a very stubborn high pressure ridge offshore that acts like a shield against storms coming in.

I'm a huge fan of the drought. There's already 40 million people here. 30 million would be better, with a million less chain restaurants. Anyway, it rains plenty along the north coast.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
25,512
Reaction score
12,476
Points
1,430
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
NASA climate models... all failures.. And this prediction is bull shit too.. With their track record of 100% failure (along with NOAA, the EPA, and IPCC) there isn't a prediction I would worry about that any of them make. One need only look at how they are fabricating the past climate records to meet their failed models needs, in an effort to gain credibility, to see that they are lying for an agenda.

NASA and NOAA's new motto is, IF empirical evidence doesn't agree with our models we must throw out empirical evidence and make shit up that agree's.
 
Last edited:

Treeshepherd

Wood Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
18,738
Reaction score
7,133
Points
360
Location
Endor
I wonder if it is a prediction to state the desert will be dry.
Exactly. Saying we're going to have another megadrought is like saying we're going to have another mega-quake. It's a given.

"Through studies of tree rings, sediment and other natural evidence, researchers have documented multiple droughts in California that lasted 10 or 20 years in a row during the past 1,000 years -- compared to the mere three-year duration of the current dry spell. The two most severe megadroughts make the Dust Bowl of the 1930s look tame: a 240-year-long drought that started in 850 and, 50 years after the conclusion of that one, another that stretched at least 180 years. "
California drought Past dry periods have lasted more than 200 years scientists say - San Jose Mercury News
 

elektra

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
9,311
Reaction score
1,353
Points
255
Location
Temecula California
Ir is impossible to have a drought as predicted by NASA, that would mean hydroelectric dams are not renewable.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
65,584
Reaction score
13,587
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Thanks for reinforcing my belief that the RW posters on this board are ignorant. You have exceeded your previous record level of stupidity!
Speaking of stupidity, I love the liberal idea that we can stop climate from changing.
All we need to do is waste trillions on unreliable energy........and crush our economy.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
25,512
Reaction score
12,476
Points
1,430
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
Now this piece of NASA propaganda is priceless..

Humans have caused major climate changes to happen already, and we have set in motion more changes still. Even if we stopped emitting greenhouse gases today, global warming would continue to happen for at least several more decades if not centuries. That’s because it takes a while for the planet (for example, the oceans) to respond, and because carbon dioxide – the predominant heat-trapping gas – lingers in the atmosphere for hundreds of years. There is a time lag between what we do and when we feel it.
CO2 is not a heat rapping gas. That is a bold face lie, worse still is they know it and still leave it . The residence period for CO2 is 5-7 years at maximum not the 30-100 years they submit. The conjecture they draw on ice and arctic regions is hype and unsupported by any fact.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
25,512
Reaction score
12,476
Points
1,430
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
Now this piece of NASA propaganda is priceless..

Humans have caused major climate changes to happen already, and we have set in motion more changes still. Even if we stopped emitting greenhouse gases today, global warming would continue to happen for at least several more decades if not centuries. That’s because it takes a while for the planet (for example, the oceans) to respond, and because carbon dioxide – the predominant heat-trapping gas – lingers in the atmosphere for hundreds of years. There is a time lag between what we do and when we feel it.
CO2 is not a heat rapping gas. That is a bold face lie, worse still is they know it and still leave it . The residence period for CO2 is 5-7 years at maximum not the 30-100 years they submit. The conjecture they draw on ice and arctic regions is hype and unsupported by any fact.
Yes, because you are a scientist...right. You people are amazingly stupid!
I am a certified Meteorologist with a BS degree in Atmospheric Physics approaching a Masters sign off and currently doing PHD work with a Masters in Police Supervision. I also have minor degrees in electronic communications and electrical engineering. And YOU?
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top