Resnic
Diamond Member
- May 2, 2021
- 12,136
- 14,135
- 2,288
- Thread starter
- #81
Boiled down to it: your argument is "let them die?"
Never said that at all. You decided that's what i said because either 1 you missed the point entirely or 2 you didn't like my point so you decided to change it's point to avoid discussion and could take on a stonewall stance.
If I intended to say screw em, then that's exactly what I'd have said. I pointed out more survivors will not mean less drug users.
100% of deaths won't use drugs again. So say 10 in 50 overdoses die. And 1 in 10 survivors quit drugs. If they all live because of narcan otc that number of people who quit drugs goes down because you raised the number of people who survive up. So you'll have more people running around doing drugs that otherwise would be dead but only a small portion will quit.
But at the end of the day, screw em. If our society didn't tolerate, accept and in this case encourage dopeheads, criminals and crazy people and allow them to freely walk about our society the 95% of population would have much better lives.
You don't want to end drug problems, you want to find ways for our country to live with drug problems. And that's what this is, a way to live with and accept drug problems.