Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's your opinion. I believe you are the one who doesn't understand the FLoT.
I have no desire to educate you on anything.
Of course science is valuable. How else do you think we figured out the origin of the universe? Which by the way did not violate the FLoT.
So according to you Tyndall could observe the GHG in action in his laboratory controlled experiment by observing different cool down times of two different gas compositions but it's not possible to measure what he observed?No. Why would you assume that? What you could potentially measure is the simple concept of how much heat CO2 absorbs. But that isn't the greenhouse effect. You should really know all this but I'll write it out for you:
I think you are abu afuk. I always thought abu was a chick too.You guys are so original! When someone points out your clear ignorance in a topic you respond with "Nuh-huh! That's YOU!" Honestly it's like talking to toddlers.
You couldn't if you wanted to.
Oh god, more hints that you want to talk about your "cosmology".
OK, I give up. Tell us about the "origin of the universe".
LOL. I'll wait.
So according to you Tyndall could observe the GHG in action in his laboratory controlled experiment by observing different cool down times of two different gas compositions but it's not possible to measure what he observed?
It's emotional posts like this that led me to believe you are a woman.
So according to you Tyndall could observe the GHG in action
The paper won't answer the question I am asking you.Why don't you just point to the part of the original paper that you have a problem with. I'm tired of trying to figure out what your game is here.
Here's the paper: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspl.1859.0017
So just tell me what you are having difficulty with.
I was happy enough to show that you don't know how the FLoT could allow a universe being created from nothing, dear.I see you aren't going to grace us with your "cosmology". Oh well. Another crackpot hypothesis I'll have to miss out on.
By measuring different times for the cooling down of two different gas compositions after heating them up in the same identical way, right?No. He observed gases absorbing IR.
That's not the GHG effect. That's a theoretical feedback that is based upon the programming of a computer simulation.Quantifying how much added CO2 leads to a surface temperature change is called the CLIMATE SENSITIVITY and that is done rather more in-depth and requires a lot more systems associated with it.
The paper won't answer the question I am asking you.
That's not the GHG effect. That's a theoretical feedback that is based upon the programming of a computer simulation.
By measuring different times for the cooling down of two different gas compositions after heating them up in the same identical way, right?
And the 100% CO2 gas composition took longer to cool down, right?
So why can't you look at the temperature differences at each point and time to determine the associated temperature due to the GHG effect of CO2?
I was happy enough to show that you don't know how the FLoT could allow a universe being created from nothing, dear.
Climate sensitivity isn't just based upon the greenhouse effect of CO2. If it were I wouldn't be having a problem.It answers your question: how much temperature increases in the atmosphere by addition of a given amount of CO2.
That's the DEFINITION of climate sensitivity for CO2.
Are you arguing he didn't observe a temperature differential between the two different gas compositions he tested?Did you see any temperature numbers in the TYndall paper?
I'm still waiting for you to show me one.
Honey, it's not my theory. It's the accepted theory. It's called the Big Bang. Maybe you have heard of it.But you didn't show anything like that because you haven't said ANYTHING IN DETAIL about your crackpot theory of the origins of the universe.
I'm sure it's special as all get out, but you haven't told us what your magic story is.
Are you some religious nutjob going to tell us about your faith? Or are you some wacked out "electric universe-plasma cosmology" nutter? Or are you going to talk about the standard hypotheses?
Whatever it is I'm sure it's special.
Because he was the one who performed the experiment that showed the GHG effect delaying cooling, right? That is what he showed, right? So just repeat that experiment and plot up the temperatures and I'll accept that.Then why are you asking it in relation to Tyndall's paper????
Because he was the one who performed the experiment that showed the GHG effect delaying cooling, right? That is what he showed, right? So just repeat that experiment and plot up the temperatures and I'll accept that.
