Musk may fire 75% of current Twitter employees

Foxfyre

Eternal optimist
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 11, 2007
67,586
33,015
2,330
Desert Southwest USA
Yes this belongs in Politics because there has been no transaction in recent history that has created more political reaction waves than Elon Musk's saga of becoming the primary, even sole owner of Twitter. It is talked about across the internet, on social media, in Congress. . .

And now it is being reported that his intent is to reduce the existing Twitter workforce by 75%. This is an economy move as Twitter currently nets between $1 and $2 billion per year compared to Facebooks almost $40 billion per year.

Those supporting this initiative generally come from the aspect that it will be mostly those scouring Twitter for rightwing accounts to censor or suspend who will be let go. (We don't know that, but that's the scuttlebutt.)

Those opposing it mostly seem to be afraid there won't be as much censorship or suspensions of those account on the right though they never say it quite that way. Their terminology is that there won't be as efficient monitoring of 'harmful' or 'misleading' information which is how they characterize the tweets of MAGA or others on the right.

Some like me would welcome ability for those on the right to exercise free speech without having to be so careful of each word or phrase, but my concern is there won't be censorship of the radical extremists on the right who just tweet insults, slurs, talking points, false memes etc. which are not at all helpful and are often detrimental to the MAGA public image and agenda.

 
Yes this belongs in Politics because there has been no transaction in recent history that has created more political reaction waves than Elon Musk's saga of becoming the primary, even sole owner of Twitter. It is talked about across the internet, on social media, in Congress. . .

And now it is being reported that his intent is to reduce the existing Twitter workforce by 75%. This is an economy move as Twitter currently nets between $1 and $2 billion per year compared to Facebooks almost $40 billion per year.

Those supporting this initiative generally come from the aspect that it will be mostly those scouring Twitter for rightwing accounts to censor or suspend who will be let go. (We don't know that, but that's the scuttlebutt.)

Those opposing it mostly seem to be afraid there won't be as much censorship or suspensions of those account on the right though they never say it quite that way. Their terminology is that there won't be as efficient monitoring of 'harmful' or 'misleading' information which is how they characterize the tweets of MAGA or others on the right.

Some like me would welcome ability for those on the right to exercise free speech without having to be so careful of each word or phrase, but my concern is there won't be censorship of the radical extremists on the right who just tweet insults, slurs, talking points, false memes etc. which are not at all helpful and are often detrimental to the MAGA public image and agenda.


His company now, he can do whatever he likes. He can go around banning left wing accounts. Twitter has always been awful, and it always will be. Maybe Musk will make it work, or maybe he'll lose $4 billion.
 
His company now, he can do whatever he likes. He can go around banning left wing accounts. Twitter has always been awful, and it always will be. Maybe Musk will make it work, or maybe he'll lose $4 billion.
He can't do anything he wants and be profitable. His goal is both free speech and profitability. I for one wish him well in both.
 
Yes this belongs in Politics because there has been no transaction in recent history that has created more political reaction waves than Elon Musk's saga of becoming the primary, even sole owner of Twitter. It is talked about across the internet, on social media, in Congress. . .

And now it is being reported that his intent is to reduce the existing Twitter workforce by 75%. This is an economy move as Twitter currently nets between $1 and $2 billion per year compared to Facebooks almost $40 billion per year.

Those supporting this initiative generally come from the aspect that it will be mostly those scouring Twitter for rightwing accounts to censor or suspend who will be let go. (We don't know that, but that's the scuttlebutt.)

Those opposing it mostly seem to be afraid there won't be as much censorship or suspensions of those account on the right though they never say it quite that way. Their terminology is that there won't be as efficient monitoring of 'harmful' or 'misleading' information which is how they characterize the tweets of MAGA or others on the right.

Some like me would welcome ability for those on the right to exercise free speech without having to be so careful of each word or phrase, but my concern is there won't be censorship of the radical extremists on the right who just tweet insults, slurs, talking points, false memes etc. which are not at all helpful and are often detrimental to the MAGA public image and agenda.

Good for him. I hope the terminations include the rats who keep banning people.
 
And O'biden is not happy. They are worried about the inability to control the truth...
The leftists are definitely apprehensive. They've had all of social media in their pockets and are beginning to lose some of that. It could have the same effect on information that conservative talk radio had.

But once he has access to the books Musk will no doubt adjust his business model numerous times until he hits the right combination. Facebook has twice the employees Twitter now has and it is many times over more profitable. But Musk didn't become one of the world's richest men by making stupid business decisions. So we'll see.
 
So, where are all those monkeys supposed to go?????


1666398362067.png
 
So what? Seriously, this underlines the unimportance of Twitter. If he was taking over some oil company or car company or retail company, and cutting the labor force by 75%, people would be freaking out.

Twitter could cease to exist tomorrow and there would be practically no impact on anything.
 
Musk is talking out his ass again. Firing 75% of employees would do massive damage to the platform, scare away advertisers, and never turn a profit.
There is no platform. It's all software to prevent information from being available to the herd. It was Obama's opposition to free speech. It was his "disinformation" platform, and now it's not...
 

Forum List

Back
Top