You need a score card for this
For now Elon can sit and judge and have people pay him which is so American
It is like the other poster says. media companies and there subscribers are not the state
First Amendment does not apply to them and many have tried to claim free speech in the past.
But that was in the past, Now social media has grown, become toxic, and can reach a large number of people
Again SCOTUS has been called on to save the herd
How does it apply to government officials who use the social media
a wrinkle in the fabric of protecting the herd
the thin line between posting as an official or an individual
Thus we all remember how conservatives would complained about all the toxic left wing sites
Now Elon M and Donald T has come to save them
remember when Elon banned Trump
Then states want to ban as why should those two have all the fun
Also because social media is an easy way to get notifications out to the general public makes you go hmmm
States want to stop individual information from being posted on social post by other posters which is a legitimate concern
SCOTUS says take a break and we will be back soon in October
The supreme court put it on the back burner
wait a minute just put up your government site and have subscribers
Then you have those who believe that its a trap
Still it like the emergency broadcast system ready.gov which not everyone knows about
The case involves posts on Facebook, X and other media platforms.
apnews.com
www.foxnews.com
www.nbcnews.com
