Musk dismisses predictions from scientist on climate change. Says we have 20 years to fix the world.

I stand for the National Anthem ... you bow? ... sad, really sad ... why not lie prostrate in the presence of your almighty god The Donald ... I'm an American and I bow to none but God above ...

That was actually a joke ... of course I'm a liberal ... Acid, Amnesty and Abortion ... I'm all for making Catholics pay for abortions services for illegal immigrants ...
Maga trash voted for a convicted FELON.
 
So you literally think the scientists are laboring under the ignorance of their own life's work.

If you took a moment to act like a normal adult, you would see how absurd and embarrassing that is. But a minimum of normal human shame would be required.
Of course they are

See COVID lab leak theory.
See trans theory

Scientists aren’t perfect
 
What the NBC story documents is the following


1. we have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons
2. for more than 3 decades of rising atmospheric CO2, both showed NO ATMOSPHERIC "warming" and were highly correlated
3. the excuses for the 2005 FUDGE JOB doesn't begin to pass a "smell test" and anyone who accepts that fudge as "real" is a complete idiot
Yet you are the only one complaining, no other climatologists or reputable peer reviewed journals?
 
I really wasn't shocked at your ignorance.

Look at this bilge I just found: Toddsterpatriot

1735244023337.webp
 
Toddsterpatriot is a conspiracy nutjob, the site is for nutjobs:


1735244337424.png


This explains everything Tosser Patriot, now it all makes sense a fuckin closet conspiracy freak, been peddling bilge for twenty five fuckin years :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
Maga trash voted for a convicted FELON.

I voted for the menstrual one ... stupid ... what impoverish third-world shithole did you learn English-as-a-Second-Language? ... try reading with comprehension ... and quit being such a Democrat ... or go bow to Biden or something ...
 
Yet you are the only one complaining, no other climatologists or reputable peer reviewed journals?


LOL!!!!!!!


Find us one "climatologist" or someone who fudged a "climate study" you parrot who can answer basic climate questions...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



and when you cannot, ask yourself why no "climate expert" will...



In 2007 we went to court in Britain...





No OCEAN RISE....

  • The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.



90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is GROWING...

  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
 
LOL!!!!!!!


Find us one "climatologist" or someone who fudged a "climate study" you parrot who can answer basic climate questions...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



and when you cannot, ask yourself why no "climate expert" will...



In 2007 we went to court in Britain...





No OCEAN RISE....

  • The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.



90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is GROWING...

  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
This is what the Judge found:

The judge concluded "I have no doubt that Dr Stott, the Defendant's expert, is right when he says that: 'Al Gore's presentation of the causes and likely effects of climate change in the film was broadly accurate.'" On the basis of testimony from Dr. Robert M. Carter and the arguments put forth by the claimant's lawyers, the judge also pointed to nine of the statements that Dimmock's counsel had described as "errors" as inaccuracies; i.e, that were not representative of the mainstream. He also found that some of these statements arose in the context of supporting Al Gore's political thesis. The judge required that the guidance notes should address these statements.

Ultimately this is a critique of a subjective documentary and Al Gore not climate change science or any peer reviewed scientific papers.

Once again please show me a peer reviewed publication that supports your claim that the atmospheric warming was untrue and that the satellite data was trustworthy and shows a cooling of the atmosphere. You cannot else you would have done so by now.
 
This is what the Judge found:



Ultimately this is a critique of a subjective documentary and Al Gore not climate change science or any peer reviewed scientific papers.

Once again please show me a peer reviewed publication that supports your claim that the atmospheric warming was untrue and that the satellite data was trustworthy and shows a cooling of the atmosphere. You cannot else you would have done so by now.



So explain how it is "broadly accurate" if 90% of Earth ice on land mass Antarctica is INCREASING....?????

There is no ongoing net ice melt = completely INACCURATE


Hilarious you cannot find one single "climate expert" who can answer BASIC CLIMATE QUESTIONS....

Are they STUPID or CHICKEN?
 

Well, Elon...we are about to lose 4 years with your good pal in charge. So, we actually have far less time, and since you are not a scientist and I am tired of hearing your stupid predictions...you only say what you think maga wants to hear. Face it, trump is going to screw over the economy, the environment, and everything else he gets his grubby little hands on.
While the U.S. emits a little more than 11% of the world’s anthropogenic greenhouse gases, Nicolas Loris, vice president of public policy of C3 solutions, says “the U.S. could cut its carbon dioxide emissions 100% and it would not make a difference in abating global warming.”


The stupidity of climate alarmists
 
So explain how it is "broadly accurate" if 90% of Earth ice on land mass Antarctica is INCREASING....?????

What the fuck does that mean? how can 90% of something be said to be increasing?

1735400326457.png

There is no ongoing net ice melt = completely INACCURATE

Hilarious you cannot find one single "climate expert" who can answer BASIC CLIMATE QUESTIONS....

Are they STUPID or CHICKEN?
You are relying on intuition to describe what you expect to see in the world. Intuition plays no role in mathematics and the complex differential equations that govern atmospherics, fluid dynamics and climate.

This is all I see when trumpanzees mouth off about things they don't understand, they make huge assumptions that are false and wonder why the educated amongst us ridicule them.

For the fifth time, please cite a reputable peer reviewed source that agrees with your claims about satellite based infra red sensors not needing a correction, you clearly have none.

As the saying goes extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

You also seem to not understand that the human race has never collectively faced a thing like climate change, so of course we can expect some disagreements and some controversies that's normal, nobody alive today or at any point in recorded history has ever faced such an immense problem.

Squeaking little foot stamping trumpanzees like you are just a waste of time, all you seem to care about is supporting your pet conspiracy theories.

I am by nature a skeptic, I do not take everything I read at face value, I do research and I look at disputes and try to make sense of what's being said, I am an evolution skeptic for example but you can bet I do not ramble on like you've been doing, I can support my position on EVERYTHING that I believe with sound reasonable arguments, data and sources.

Why the fuck does this even matter to you anyway?
 
Last edited:
You are relying on intuition to describe what you expect to see in the world. Intuition plays no role in mathematics and the complex differential equations that govern atmospherics, fluid dynamics and climate.

This is all I see when trumpanzees mouth off about things they don't understand, they make huge assumptions that are false and wonder why the educated amongst us ridicule them.

For the fifth time, please cite a reputable peer reviewed source that agrees with your claims about satellite based infra red sensors not needing a correction, you clearly have none.

As the saying goes extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.


LOL!!!!

Parrots always assume everyone else is a parrot. Someone gave the FBI the CO2 FRAUD prosecution that homO hid in the closet...




You cannot find the truth in the OPs of these links below anywhere else, because it "self originated" and that's why your side cannot refute any of it, so it censors it...






 
LOL!!!!

Parrots always assume everyone else is a parrot. Someone gave the FBI the CO2 FRAUD prosecution that homO hid in the closet...




You cannot find the truth in the OPs of these links below anywhere else, because it "self originated" and that's why your side cannot refute any of it, so it censors it...







Your putting the cart before the horse, all I see is endless grumbling about how what's being said doesn't meet your expectations. But your expectations are immaterial, they do not originate in sound scientific reasoning but your own intuition and that's where you're failing.

You suspect people's motives and that's because you're drawn to conspiracy fantasies, it is the fascination and intrigue of the alleged conspiracy that excites your mind, not the quest for truth.
 
Back
Top Bottom