Musk dismisses predictions from scientist on climate change. Says we have 20 years to fix the world.

[Toddsterpatriot]

"We"? So, government built and owned?

If that's what it takes to save us from CO2, why not?

 

[ReinyDays]

Where did you get your PhD in Environmental Science? Just another maga cult member trying to be smart.

I took a class ... that means I know A LOT more than you do about Atmospheric Science ... including climatology ...

"Environmental Science" is a certificate program from vocational schools or community colleges ... for folks who can't handle the math needed for college science ... but need a job in the sewage pumping industries ...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

He's just not as good at soliciting bribes as the fat rapist is, like he did with the oil execs.

Now that we're fine with the orange charity thief doing it, future presidents won't be so shy.

Biden's family has been selling access for decades.

What oil bribes are you imagining now?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If that's what it takes to save us from CO2, why not?

Good idea

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Biden's family has been selling access for decades.

But not Joe Biden.

I know those weasel words work well on Newsmax, but we're not on Newsmax.

They also probably didn't show you the video of Trump.soliciting bribes. Sad.

Try again?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

But not Joe Biden.

I know those weasel words work well on Newsmax, but we're not on Newsmax.

Try again?

The Big Guy gets his 10%.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Big Guy gets his 10%.

In White Wing fantasyland. Yes, I know.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

The Big Guy gets his 10%.

The fake patriot strikes again, suck on this:

Over 11 months while former President Trump was in office, his Washington, D.C., hotel took in some $300,000 from sources inside and outside of government, including tens of thousands in payments from the U.S. Secret Service.

The guest logs, obtained from Trump’s accounting firm by Democrats on the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, prompted accusations that Trump violated a constitutional prohibition on accepting funds from federal and state governments.

One of the top contributors to that figure, the Secret Service, routinely paid more than other guests at the hotel to house agents who were staying there to protect various Trump family members. In less than a year, the agency paid more than $70,000 to stay at the Washington hotel.

Loading…

thehill.com

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I said "probably" because you never gave dates, just a generic "before humans roamed". Your reasoning is laughable too, even if the earth's climate has changed in the distant past how does that prove that human activity does not cause a change to the climate?

Forest fires occur naturally and have for millions of years and destroy large swathes of forest, does that prove that human's cannot start a forest fire?

This is the mess you'll get yourself into when you attempt to out reason Sherlock Holmes, I'm the world's greatest detective and you're a purple lizard with pointy ears.

It proves that climate changes naturally and how much humans contribute to it is still not an exact science.

Dumb lib

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Wow!

Have you told that to the scientists who discoverd it and taught it to you?

Won't they be surprised!

I have. They are thankful.

You’re welcome

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The fake patriot strikes again, suck on this:

Loading…

thehill.com

Toddsterpatriot owns you. Just take the L and go sit on a cactus.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The fake patriot strikes again, suck on this:

Loading…

thehill.com

That's awful!
How much does the Secret Service pay the Clinton's?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

That's awful!
How much does the Secret Service pay the Clinton's?

You ask an awful lot of rather basic questions for a person who likes to insinuate that he knows about stuff.

 

[EMH]

there were THREE studies

This is what matters to the beaked birdbrain science invalid.

THREE fudge "studies" said so. FIFTY different taxpayer funded "studies" said so.

So "You need a study that agrees with you."

LOL!!!

Um, no I don't. "Science" is not about taxpayer funded fudge "studies" by conflicted liars. Science is about DATA.

The DATA shows NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising CO2.

There is NO DATA that shows warming, ONLY FUDGE...


That you are incapable of understanding that is proof you do not understand BASIC SCIENCE at all.

You are just a PARROT of lies.

And you cannot even answer basic climate questions, nor can you refute any of the links I've posted.

NOT ONE WORD.

 

[EMH]

Your reasoning is laughable too, even if the earth's climate has changed in the distant past how does that prove that human activity does not cause a change to the climate?

The real question is what caused climate change in the past, and you cannot answer that.


Take Jurassic, warmer, wetter, much higher surface air pressure. What caused that?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

This is what matters to the beaked birdbrain science invalid.

THREE fudge "studies" said so. FIFTY different taxpayer funded "studies" said so.

So "You need a study that agrees with you."

LOL!!!

Um, no I don't. "Science" is not about taxpayer funded fudge "studies" by conflicted liars. Science is about DATA.

The DATA shows NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising CO2.

There is NO DATA that shows warming, ONLY FUDGE...


That you are incapable of understanding that is proof you do not understand BASIC SCIENCE at all.

You are just a PARROT of lies.

And you cannot even answer basic climate questions, nor can you refute any of the links I've posted.

NOT ONE WORD.

So, you offer no credible scientifically respectable source for your belief - fine, that pretty much closes the matter.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

The real question is what caused climate change in the past, and you cannot answer that.

I don't care, I could if I did some research but it has zero bearing on what we're discussing, it's a strawman, a red herring. You want to talk about the past and I want to talk about the future.

Take Jurassic, warmer, wetter, much higher surface air pressure. What caused that?

What has that got to do with the current discussion about climate change? That the climate could change naturally does not serve as proof that it cannot change unnaturally does it? A large enough meteor could cause a huge global winter, there are myriad possible events.

Where do you intellectual fruitcakes come from - are you also a trumpanzee?

 

[EMH]

So, you offer no credible scientifically respectable source for your belief - fine, that pretty much closes the matter.

LOL!!!!!!

Every "scientifically respectable source" you cite cannot answer any of these basic climate questions, since answering them correctly is to admit CO2 does absolutely nothing...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?


You, of course, are way too much of a science invalid coward to even try.

Your definition of "respectable" is THEY FUDGE DATA, THEY LIE, and THE MEDIA PARROTS THEM...


And you are "sure" of something, that CO2 causes "warming," despite the minor fact that THERE IS NO ACTUAL DATA SUPPORTING THAT....

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

LOL!!!!!!

Every "scientifically respectable source" you cite cannot answer any of these basic climate questions, since answering them correctly is to admit CO2 does absolutely nothing...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?


You, of course, are way too much of a science invalid coward to even try.

Your definition of "respectable" is THEY FUDGE DATA, THEY LIE, and THE MEDIA PARROTS THEM...


And you are "sure" of something, that CO2 causes "warming," despite the minor fact that THERE IS NO ACTUAL DATA SUPPORTING THAT....

So other than you criticizing that NBC article that explains how errors were present in earlier analyses of atmospheric temperature, there's nothing else? no other science magazine or journal that shares your concerns? I refuse to discuss other questions until I get an answer - is that not fair?

(This is the fourth time I've asked you this).

 

[EMH]

I don't care, I could if I did some research but it has zero bearing on what we're discussing, it's a strawman, a red herring. You want to talk about the past and I want to talk about the future.

What has that got to do with the current discussion about climate change? That the climate could change naturally does not serve as proof that it cannot change unnaturally does it?

Where do you intellectual fruitcakes come from - are you also a trumpanzee?

In other words, you have NO CLUE what caused Earth climate to change during Jurassic.

That's pretty funny. But you are "sure" that increasing atmospheric CO2 now is causing "warming," never mind the TWO AND ONLY TWO ACTUAL MEASURES WE HAVE OF THAT SAY JUST THE OPPOSITE...

It helps to discover what did cause Earth climate to change in the past before trying to predict it in the future...


Face it, you are a sick left wing liar science invalid and you love CO2 FRAUD because


1. it has stolen $20 trillion from America
2. it harms America's competitiveness
3. it rewards liars who help grow government

and you do not care one bit about the actual environment, but rather just using hysteria to continue to bilk the taxpayer over

THE MOST OBVIOUS FRAUD IN SCIENCE HISTORY