I'm ignorant?!?! You're the dimbulb equating donations from years in the past to the Clinton Foundation for things that had NOTHING to do with the election and getting direct assistance during the actual election?!?!
The snowflakes have frothed at the mouth for 2 years claiming 'Trump Collusion' with the Russians, evidence of which they have not been able to come up with yet.
Mueller can't even provide evidence of any crime having been committed regarding the Russians involving Trump's team that required investigating let alone a Special Counsel.
They have tried every single possible way to try to connect Trump to the Russians, even going back before Clinton was President to try to come up with crimes that might in some way link back to Trump, which they haven't.
When the same process / standards are applied to the Clintons, suddenly snowflakes like you cry 'foul', 'not applicable'. Bwuhahahaha....
You can close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, and chant 'Lalalalalalalalalalalala' if you want to in order to avoid the truth but it's still the truth and still there:
Only one of the 2 took over $100 million directly from the KGB Bank.
- That would be HILLARY.
Only one of the spouses of a candidate took $500k directly from the KGB Bank.
- That would be BILL CLINTON.
Only one campaign manager took thousands of un-reported Russian stocks.
- That would be John Podesta, HILLARY'S campaign manager.
Only one campaign managers' company's Board of directors were 1/3rd comprised of prominent Russian businessmen with direct connections to the Kremlin and Putin himself:
- That would be John Podesta, HILLARY's campaign manager.
*** BONUS ROUND: 'Fat Tony' Podesta, John's brother, was working for both the KGB Bank AND the Russian Intel Collection Agency.
Only once candidate KNEW about crimes the Russians were committing associated with their attempts to acquire Uranium one and US uranium yet said nothing about it / kept it hidden until the deal was done.
- That would be HILLARY.
Only one candidate's spouse attempted to meet with Russian Uranium Agency directors and when getting an audience with them was denied then met directly with Vladimir Putin.
- That would be BILL CLINTON.
'That had nothing to do with the election'.
- You can't produce any evidence the President had anything to do with illegally colluding with the Russians in the 2016 election, either....but all the evidence that exists shows the Clintons were basically humping the Russians' leg and being paid extremely well by the KGB Bank.
One of the crimes the Russians were involved in during the Uranium One scandal was their proven bribery / buying of Nuclear agency officials and high ranking politicians....like Hillary. She and Slick Willey received MILLIONS over time from the Russians.....You think that was a down-payment for their 1/2 of the 'Reset Button' Prop she would give them?
The Russians also gave willing liberal groups cash to spread racial division and VIOLENCE across the US. Yeah, Hillary took their money, too at one time or another. She, like the Russians, was proven to have been funding violence against Trump supporters.
All these connections, all this money, all this evidence....and snowflakes be like:
I KNOW if we keep looking long
enough we will find evidence of
illegal collusion between TRUMP
and the Russians.
Bwuhahahaha.....