Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Folks are brainwashed.Acceptance of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia
They do not support Intelligent Design. How come, if ID is religion and the designer is supposedly God?
have you tried any other sources than wiki??Acceptance of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia
They do not support Intelligent Design. How come, if ID is religion and the designer is supposedly God?
Acceptance of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia
They do not support Intelligent Design. How come, if ID is religion and the designer is supposedly God?
but at the end of the day they are still deer and not a completely different animal,,Baptist schools teach it for what it is a Theory. As did my public high school Biology class. Do all living things adapt to their environment? yes. Change physically? Yes. For example, whitetail deer further south you go the smaller the whitetail deer until you come to the Keys in South Florida where they are no bigger than a medium-size dog. Can deer grow wings? you have to prove it to me. But I have seen deer in wet environments like the everglades with skin grown between their split hooves as if to make them better swimmers. It's not common but I have seen it. Is this an example of evolution? I leave that up to the experts to decide.
evolution claims cows turned into whales and T-rex turned into a chicken
thats their clever way of distancing themselves from being laughed out of the bar after a long day of drinking,,In fact, it doesn't. It claims that cows, whales, T-Rex's, and Chickens have common ancestors.
There is no hocus-pocus where biology is concerned.
thats their clever way of distancing themselves from being laughed out of the bar after a long day of drinking,,
your ancestors are what came before you,, hence you came from them,,
The evolutionists do not have the mind to comprehend that there may be more to the infinities than just the three & a half dimensional continuum that we on planet earth exist in @ current. The people with the more in depth minds, mathematicians & physicists, ESPECIALLY some of the top tier geniuses that are listed in the below link WELL understood the paradox of the dimension of time. Like why can humanity only experience half of the time dimension? Why can humanity move forward through the time dimension but humanity can not travel backwards through the time dimension? Professor Einstein dropped humanity to its knees for the count with his statement: "Time is but a stubborn illusion." I could not understand the concepts that the physicist students talked to me about when I was a student @ EWU, but I realized that they were genuinely doing their best to try & answer my questions on a level that my mind could @ least somewhat comprehend. If the evolutionists cannot comprehend a subject they just say it does not exist. That's the diff between a person trying to comprehend a new concept & a person too lazy to even try & comprehend a new concept.Acceptance of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia
They do not support Intelligent Design. How come, if ID is religion and the designer is supposedly God?
famousphysicists.org
Judaism (Reconstructionist, Reform, and Conservative)Acceptance of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia
They do not support Intelligent Design. How come, if ID is religion and the designer is supposedly God?
YOU CAN'T READ1. Wikipedia is a Left-wing, lying rag.
2. What "religions believe" does not represent the best and most compelling arguments for intelligent design.
3. What a majority of anybody believes does not determine reality, as has been shown throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Here is a huge body of information, links, images, sources, and quotes showing the impossibility of archaic Darwinian extrapolation from what we see as changes in allele frequency:
A>B>C>D is not science, it is unintelligent
reading wiki is a waste of time and rots the brain,,YOU CAN'T READ
As I said before, folks are brainwashed . . . into imagining, for example, that the adaptive radiation of a common design couldn't entail an extensive range of genetic speciation within kinds, which would not require the shaping of trillions of creatures after all.I suspect that we pay G-d a compliment by assuming he's wise enough to create molecular biology so he doesn't have to spend all his time shaping trillions of individual creatures by hand.
My G-d works smart, not hard.
YOU CAN'T READ
The "Prime Mover" concept was first articulated by Thomas Aquinas. It is consistent with the theory of Evolution.
Not a big deal.
