More whistleblowers coming forward!

[Denizen]

People prepared to take the risk of whistle-blowing on Donald Trump's misdeeds are growing in numbers.

It's likely that new whistleblowers will have new and different information unless they are just people trying to avoid being implicated in Donald Trump's crimes by coming clean and confessing to witnessing crimes.

The floodgates have opened as and as more is revealed more people have reason to try to dissociate themselves from Donald Trump's actions by becoming whistleblowers.

The floodgates of the dam of Donald Trump's dirty deeds have opened.

The courage of Maria Yovanovitch is an example to other administration officials.

More Potential Whistleblowers Are Contacting Congress

More Potential Whistleblowers Are Contacting Congress

The first two officials who came forward about the president’s pressure campaign on Ukraine seem to be just the beginning, according to Hill sources.
Spencer Ackerman
Sam Brodey
Sam Stein
Updated 10.11.19 8:08PM ET / Published 10.11.19 12:13PM ET

New potential whistleblowers are coming forward to the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, two congressional sources tell The Daily Beast.
They seem to be emboldened by the actions of the whistleblower whose explosive account of President Donald Trump’s phone call to Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky about investigating Trump’s domestic political rivals ignited the impeachment inquiry. Another whistleblower is known to have come forward.
Congressional investigators are currently vetting the new accounts they’ve received for credibility. Accordingly, knowledgeable sources would not discuss where in the government these new would-be whistleblowers come from, nor what they purport to have to say.
It’s also unknown if their accounts are as significant as that of the intelligence whistleblower whose alarm over President Trump’s July 25 phone call sparked the impeachment probe. Investigators often encounter cranks as well as those with genuine knowledge of wrongdoing. Nor is it clear if these new ostensible whistleblowers have contacted any inspectors general, as the original two whistleblowers did.
“There are clearly numerous whistleblowers out there and many people who possess firsthand relevant information who could come forward, and I expect some will,” said attorney Mark Zaid, who represents those two whistleblowers (and also represents The Daily Beast in freedom-of-information lawsuits).

One knowledgeable source said that the daily accumulation of revelations about Trump’s willingness to use U.S. foreign relations for his personal political benefit has prompted more people to approach Congress. Two associates of Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani have been arrested and charged with campaign-finance violations arising from their Ukraine dirt-digging effort. The Financial Times reported that Trump China adviser Michael Pillsbury said he received “quite a bit of background” on Joe Biden’s son after Trump publicly called for China to aid his domestic political prospects. The Washington Post reported that Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor, and Trump attempted to quash a prosecution of a Turkish national—represented by Giuliani and important to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan—for violating Iran sanctions.
Investigators are using the soon-to-expire congressional recess to vet the accounts they’re getting.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), who chairs the House Intelligence committee, a locus of the impeachment probe, told The Daily Beast this month that he did not want to comment on whether investigators had heard from additional whistleblowers. Schiff noted that his committee rarely acknowledges receiving whistleblower complaints because “people can reverse-engineer who whistleblowers are” given an abundance of identifying information.

“The only thing I can say, and I don’t want to suggest too much by this, is we began discussions with other committees investigating these issues, when the first news started breaking about Giuliani seeking foreign help in Ukraine to aid the president’s campaign,” Schiff said.
The revelations come while Congress interviews the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine the administration removed, Maria Yovanovitch, despite the White House’s announced refusal to cooperate with the House Democratic inquiry. Other cracks in that front have emerged. On Friday, Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union implicated in the Ukraine pressure campaign, announced through his lawyers that he will defy State Department instructions against talking to Congress. ...

 

[Intolerant]

 

[lennypartiv]

Dems know they can't win any other way so they are recruiting whistle blowers.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Dems know they can't win any other way so they are recruiting whistle blowers.

Wait, are you talking about Nixon?

 

[abu afak]

Soon they'll be TEN righteous long time employees from many Depts coming forward.

`

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

More Potential Whistleblowers Are Contacting Congress

My Gosh! trump has turned our government into DC Mafia! How many crimes are they commuting committing? I guess the prediction that trump will eventually have to resign is true?

 

[bripat9643]

Sorry for the delay in getting out the whistleblowers.

They're having a hard time memorizing their lines.

Well, get ready for a parade of them, as the rats jump ship....

Any day now....

Any day now...as in, last week? The week before that? They are jumping ship in waves, now. And most very publicly so. You DO see that, right? Tell me you at least have a tenuous grasp on reality.

You can't blow the whistle when the transcripts of the phone call have already been released, moron.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You can't blow the whistle when the transcripts of the phone call have already been released

Which, of course, is idiotic, for several reasons. For one, the transcript is not the full conversation. Second, like the first whistleblower, the second likely has information not contained in the call regarding other events and individuals (wait...you didn't even know that, did you? Haha....embarrassing). Third, Anyone investigating this would, of course, attempt to corroborate any accounts by talking to others, making the whistleblowers all valuable.

 

[bripat9643]

You can't blow the whistle when the transcripts of the phone call have already been released

Which, of course, is idiotic, for several reasons. For one, the transcript is not the full conversation. Second, like the first whistleblower, the second likely has information not contained in the call regarding other events and individuals (wait...you didn't even know that, did you? Haha....embarrassing). Third, Anyone investigating this would, of course, attempt to corroborate any accounts by talking to others, making the whistleblowers all valuable.

The only relevant information is in the transcript. If there was something left out, the so-called "whistleblower" sure hasn't identified it. How would anyone know if his version of events was correct? Even a first hand witness could lie about what was said.

The only credible record we have is the transcript. People spouting hearsay are not able to corroborate anything. They are worthless as witnesses. That's why hearsay is not allowed in court.

What information that wasn't in the call could a hearsay witness (non witness) have? Nothing that dozens of other people already have, and no one has contradicted the transcript, especially the people who were there.

 

[whitehall]

How many lefties does it take to evesdrop on a phone conversation? As many as you need.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The only relevant information is in the transcript.

False, obviously. Ask the federal prosecutors arresting people. You are some kind of nutball. You will say ANYTHING.

 

[Markle]

Sorry for the delay in getting out the whistleblowers.

They're having a hard time memorizing their lines.

Well, get ready for a parade of them, as the rats jump ship....

 

[Markle]

Dems know they can't win any other way so they are recruiting whistle blowers.

Wait, are you talking about Nixon?

 

[bripat9643]

You can't blow the whistle when the transcripts of the phone call have already been released

Which, of course, is idiotic, for several reasons. For one, the transcript is not the full conversation. Second, like the first whistleblower, the second likely has information not contained in the call regarding other events and individuals (wait...you didn't even know that, did you? Haha....embarrassing). Third, Anyone investigating this would, of course, attempt to corroborate any accounts by talking to others, making the whistleblowers all valuable.

If there was information not in the transcripts, one of the many witnesses would already have revealed it already. The only information a "whistle blower" would have that isn't in the transcript is his worthless opinion, which is of no relevance to an impeachment inquiry. Your third point is like saying we need some witnesses to corroborate Neil Armstrong walking on the moon. No we don't, jackass.

 

[lennypartiv]

How many lefties does it take to evesdrop on a phone conversation? As many as you need.

The Dems and the Deep State are in this together.

 

[The Original Tree]

More Potential Whistleblowers Are Contacting Congress

My Gosh! trump has turned our government into DC Mafia! How many crimes are they commuting committing? I guess the prediction that trump will eventually have to resign is true?

And by Whistle Blowers you mean hairy man butt loving men lining up in your front yard waiting for you to blow them.

 

[The Original Tree]

The trump regime is an Open Sewer...

Kinda like your ass you offer up to hairy man butt loving, right little Putin’s butt plug?

 

[Weatherman2020]

More Potential Whistleblowers Are Contacting Congress

My Gosh! trump has turned our government into DC Mafia! How many crimes are they commuting committing? I guess the prediction that trump will eventually have to resign is true?

Go Stormy!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If there was information not in the transcripts

You can stop right there.

There was. Amd the report was made public. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, and you should feel embarrassed of yourself for even posting on this topic.

 

[bripat9643]

If there was information not in the transcripts

You can stop right there.

There was. Amd the report was made public. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, and you should feel embarrassed of yourself for even posting on this topic.

What information wasn't in the transcript?