This seems pertinent.

His testimony has credibility given what we have seen. Essentially, it's confirmation of what was suspected. Namely, the rush to get new recruits out in to the field due to the magnitude of ICE's operations resulted in training corners being cut.

BTW, he is a whistleblower which is why the article refers to him as such.
Being a whistleblower doesn’t make a person honest or his testimony true, we still need evidence, not just one persons say so, he might have a grudge or didn’t like the way his work was treating, he was fired, I don’t know but if your world only requires that he being labeled a whistleblower makes them truthful, you are going to be conned, again.
 

DOJ acknowledges violating dozens of recent court orders in New Jersey​

The Trump administration acknowledged violating court orders issued by New Jersey’s federal judges more than 50 times over the past 10 weeks in cases stemming from the Trump administration’s mass deportation push.

Associate Deputy Attorney General Jordan Fox, who was tapped in December to help lead the Justice Department’s New Jersey office after temporary pick Alina Habba was forced out, said those violations were spread across more than 547 immigration cases that have flooded the courts since early December, straining both prosecutors and judges.


Why isn't the blonde sock puppet being held accountable for the actions of subordinates?
Because the government, all 3 branches going back decades, is completely owned by the Zionist entity. That is the answer to your question. Certainly not pleasant, but the answer to your question. I'm glad you posted this. I saw news of it this morning.
 
Being a whistleblower doesn’t make a person honest or his testimony true, we still need evidence, not just one persons say so, he might have a grudge or didn’t like the way his work was treating, he was fired, I don’t know but if your world only requires that he being labeled a whistleblower makes them truthful, you are going to be conned, again.
Whistleblowers testimony IS evidence simple sir.
 
I don’t know what MAGA is for or against. My view is just because a person is labeled a whistleblower, that doesn’t make them honest in what they claim. I am still of the old school of needing hard evidence.
In that case you should be disavowing Trump. How many times does he have to be mentioned in the Epstein files, pardon drug traffickers and sell us out to the international crypto cabal before you wake up?
 
The documents — which appear to be images of the syllabus for the agency’s basic immigration enforcement training program — suggest that more than a dozen practical exams have been eliminated for enforcement removal operations officers, including exams in “judgment pistol shooting” and “criminal encounters.”
The agency also appears to have cut courses in “use of force simulation training” and legal trainings on “criminal vs. removal proceedings,” among other topics, from the training curriculum, the documents indicate. And they suggest that, contrary to acting ICE Director Todd Lyons’ testimony to Congress earlier this month, new ICE officers receive 250 fewer hours of training compared to prior recruits.

Are you capable of holding the regime accountable for anything? Question asked, answer given. No.
As I said before, there are two distinct types of ICE recruits, experienced law enforcement officers, and raw recruits with no formal training. You need to distinguish between the two before whining about cutting training courses. ICE said that experienced law enforcement officers only need the ICE specific training.
 
Being a whistleblower doesn’t make a person honest or his testimony true, we still need evidence
The evidence can be found in ICE's actions in MN and during other operations.
 
As I said before, there are two distinct types of ICE recruits, experienced law enforcement officers, and raw recruits with no formal training. You need to distinguish between the two before whining about cutting training courses.
Making note of the whistleblower's testimony only sounds like whining to those who don't want to learn about it. There is no excuse for putting officers in the field without the appropriate training. Another failure by Noem to do her job. But I can see how she was distracted by losing her blankie on that $70M jet she is demanding DHS buy for her.
 

ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training​

A whistleblower from Immigration and Customs Enforcement testified at a congressional forum Monday that the agency is “lying to Congress and the American people” about its training of new recruits.

Ryan Schwank — an ICE academy instructor for new recruits before he resigned this month — testified that the agency’s training program “is now deficient, defective, and broken.”

“Without reform, ICE will graduate thousands of new officers who do not know their constitutional duty, do not know the limits of their authority, and do not have the training to recognize an unlawful order,” he said.

New documents provided by Blumenthal’s office by an unidentified whistleblower provide more insight into how, exactly, the training protocol has changed. (Blumenthal’s staff could not confirm whether it was Schwank or another anonymous whistleblower who reached out to their office last month that provided the images of the syllabus.)

The documents — which appear to be images of the syllabus for the agency’s basic immigration enforcement training program — suggest that more than a dozen practical exams have been eliminated for enforcement removal operations officers, including exams in “judgment pistol shooting” and “criminal encounters.”

The agency also appears to have cut courses in “use of force simulation training” and legal trainings on “criminal vs. removal proceedings,” among other topics, from the training curriculum, the documents indicate. And they suggest that, contrary to acting ICE Director Todd Lyons’ testimony to Congress earlier this month, new ICE officers receive 250 fewer hours of training compared to prior recruits.

After what we have all witnessed on videos this has an undeniable ring of truth to it. Not only has the lack of training lead to an inability to "recognize an unlawful order," it apparently has left federal agents without the training to recognize lawful orders as well.

Federal Judge Slams ICE for Violating Nearly 100 Court Orders: 'ICE is Not a Law Unto Itself'​

Why do you care about training? You don't even want ICE who are properly trained.
 
When trainees are deliberately and methodically taught that they don't need to honor the constitution, something is very wrong.
 
Making note of the whistleblower's testimony only sounds like whining to those who don't want to learn about it. There is no excuse for putting officers in the field without the appropriate training. Another failure by Noem to do her job. But I can see how she was distracted by losing her blankie on that $70M jet she is demanding DHS buy for her.
Here is the DHS formal response to the bullshit training issue:
 
His testimony has credibility given what we have seen. Essentially, it's confirmation of what was suspected. Namely, the rush to get new recruits out in to the field due to the magnitude of ICE's operations resulted in training corners being cut.

BTW, he is a whistleblower which is why the article refers to him as such.

Over ten million illegal aliens invited into the country in just four years. Now THAT’S magnitude.
 
15th post
In that case you should be disavowing Trump. How many times does he have to be mentioned in the Epstein files, pardon drug traffickers and sell us out to the international crypto cabal before you wake up?
Disavow? I never supported him in the first place, I agree with some of his policies because I am a fiscal conservative but I find him to be rather crass, I disagree with his spending, I disagree with his approach to issues. I like tariffs, but he needs to be more uniformed and consistent. I wouldn’t support Trump, Harris or any Democrat or Republican that isn’t for cutting debt, that to me is the biggest issue, we need to raise taxes on everyone and cut spending in every government program. What frustrates me is DOGE went in and cut spending, found waste, we had billions in tariffs and yet debt increased. Democrats aren’t serious about the debt either, so why support to wasteful parties.

Do you disavow Biden for pardoning a man who killed two FBI agents or a party that lied to us about the mental health of a sitting President?

Both sides of the coin are dirty but most people don’t want a new coin, they want the dirty coin they have.
 
Back
Top Bottom